|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: Peter Murray <pe...@OhioLINK.edu>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, May 14 2009 2:45 pm
Subject: Re: Google and RDFa
On May 14, 10:35 am, Herbert Van de Sompel <hvds...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I trust most of you have come across this announcement by Google
It is definitely something to watch. The problem with Google's
> indicating that they will gradually start using/leveraging RDFa: announcement as it stands now is that it uses a proprietary vocabulary (rooted at http://rdf.data-vocabulary.org/) that doesn't include ORE terms (or terms resembling ORE terms). There are calls out to Google to embrace RDF/RDFa in a more inclusive sense by using other vocabularies (most notably at http://iandavis.com/blog/2009/05/googles-rdfa-a-damp-squib by Ian Davis). It is promising that Google is looking to RDFa for semantic data about
Peter You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||