http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore need to fill this is 2009-12-29T22:27:14Z Google Groups Neubert Joachim j.neub...@zbw.eu 2009-12-29T22:27:14Z http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/browse_frm/thread/13b8294393d88d43/90969b16244376ac?show_docid=90969b16244376ac

Hi Ed, <br> <p>It's great to see you exploring our data with your own tools (and thanks for releasing them - I will happily add them to my toolset!). <br> <p>Your type counts seem right (336+185+2+2+1=526) - everything is an ore:Aggregation (defined by a ore:ResourceMap) and, except the top Aggregation, has another type attached, in order to be able to handle them differently for purposes like web page generation.

Ed Summers e...@pobox.com 2009-12-28T18:29:28Z http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/browse_frm/thread/13b8294393d88d43/d557d015077bf47b?show_docid=d557d015077bf47b

Thanks for announcing this Joachim. It is great to see more linked <br> data as rdfa getting out on the web. I'm particularly excited because <br> of your use of the oai-ore vocabulary to make historic newspaper <br> archives available, since we are doing something similar at the <br> Library of Congress [1]. <br> You must've done something right because I just wrote a little naive

Neubert Joachim j.neub...@zbw.eu 2009-12-28T13:07:46Z http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/browse_frm/thread/13b8294393d88d43/579e084668536235?show_docid=579e084668536235

The 20th Century Press Archives is a collection of more than six million newspaper clippings, dating from the 19th century to 2005. They were collected by subject and cover persons, companies and commodities as well general subjects and events. <br> <p>As a unique collection and part of our cultural heritage, the archives (up to 1945) have been digitalized by German National Library of Economics (ZBW) in a project funded by DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft). Now we aim to make it widely acessible for humans and machines. The technical preview at

Erik Hetzner erik.hetz...@ucop.edu 2009-12-21T19:27:29Z http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/browse_frm/thread/d53f624d32dfe65f/8c50e7d4cf6c1c1f?show_docid=8c50e7d4cf6c1c1f

At Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:10:59 -0800 (PST), <br> Thanks for the pointer, Michael. This makes sense. <br> best, <br> Erik

MichaelNelson rhodewarri...@gmail.com 2009-12-19T05:10:59Z http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/browse_frm/thread/d53f624d32dfe65f/0cfd5395d3b2f94d?show_docid=0cfd5395d3b2f94d

We don't have examples of it in the current docs (again, it seemed <br> like a lot already), <br> but the hooks are there with the authoritative vs. non-authoritative <br> ReMs concept: <br> <a target="_blank" rel=nofollow href="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/datamodel.html#Resource_Map">[link]</a> <br> So I could create a different ReM (URI-R-MLN) that ore:describes your

Erik Hetzner erik.hetz...@ucop.edu 2009-12-19T01:13:43Z http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/browse_frm/thread/d53f624d32dfe65f/b94031633dcb4946?show_docid=b94031633dcb4946

At Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:33:09 -0700, <br> Thanks for the extended explanation. Thinking about it, it makes sense <br> (if I am not mistaken): you don’t need named graphs until you start <br> bringing together different resource maps for the same aggregation, <br> which is an issue not covered by OAI-ORE explicitly. <br> Yes, that is exactly what I was thinking. Thank you for the reference.

Herbert Van de Sompel hvds...@gmail.com 2009-12-19T00:33:09Z http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/browse_frm/thread/d53f624d32dfe65f/9420cbea828e066d?show_docid=9420cbea828e066d

Actually, that is totally correct. If you are looking for a Named <br> Graph in ORE, then it is the Resource Map. To add to Rob's feedback, <br> one of the reasons we removed the references to Named Graphs in the <br> ORE specs is that we received feedback that the specs already <br> contained a lot of new concepts for many people: information

Erik Hetzner erik.hetz...@ucop.edu 2009-12-18T23:25:44Z http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/browse_frm/thread/d53f624d32dfe65f/795861892436020e?show_docid=795861892436020e

At Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:20:04 +0000, <br> OK, thanks, I won’t. <br> I presume that the URI of the Resource Map would be the appropriate <br> identifier to use for a named graph if we were using OAI-ORE in a <br> named graph context. Is that correct? <br> Also, I am looking at using OAI-ORE with versioned resources. Does <br> anybody have any references on the use of OAI-ORE with versioned

Robert Sanderson azarot...@gmail.com 2009-12-18T22:20:04Z http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/browse_frm/thread/d53f624d32dfe65f/4f9c2e85bab30442?show_docid=4f9c2e85bab30442

We wanted to say that the Resource Map is a graph, and Named Graphs <br> were the only way to do it that we found, as RDF has only one, global <br> graph by default. <br> I wouldn't read too much in to the typing there! <br> Rob

Erik Hetzner erik.hetz...@ucop.edu 2009-12-18T22:01:54Z http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/browse_frm/thread/d53f624d32dfe65f/2f0896ce663f86cd?show_docid=2f0896ce663f86cd

At Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:34:37 +0000, <br> Hi Rob - <br> I’m a little confused about the relationship of named graphs as <br> compared with linked data. I will have to look into this more. <br> According to [1], ore:ResourceMap is a subclass of rdfg:Graph. Is this <br> a holdover from the named graph stuff? <br> best, <br> Erik Hetzner

Robert Sanderson azarot...@gmail.com 2009-12-18T20:34:37Z http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/browse_frm/thread/d53f624d32dfe65f/daab186f0c4b4a1b?show_docid=daab186f0c4b4a1b

In my opinion, Named Graphs went away because of lack of mainstream <br> support. GIven the success of the Linked Data recommendations, being <br> full Named Graphs would be a significant barrier to adoption. <br> The advantages of Named Graphs really didn't amount to much, compared <br> to the advantages of the Linked Data style.

Erik Hetzner erik.hetz...@ucop.edu 2009-12-18T20:10:03Z http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/browse_frm/thread/d53f624d32dfe65f/d72192508d36baa7?show_docid=d72192508d36baa7

Hi - <br> I am reading through the 1.0 OAI-ORE specs. Could somebody explain to <br> me what happened to named graphs? Thanks. <br> best, <br> Erik Hetzner

Ari Davidow aridavi...@gmail.com 2009-12-18T13:46:07Z http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/browse_frm/thread/5fbf29ef6c6dda95/914b6fe69340874b?show_docid=914b6fe69340874b

I think the developer forgot. The &quot;problem with CVS&quot; has been <br> resolved. See <a target="_blank" rel=nofollow href="http://drupal.org/project/nodequeue_oaiore">[link]</a> <br> ari

Ari Davidow aridavi...@gmail.com 2009-12-15T22:28:00Z http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/browse_frm/thread/5fbf29ef6c6dda95/3deb77d3fa62903e?show_docid=3deb77d3fa62903e

The nodequeue-related modules can all be found with a search on <br> &quot;nodequeue&quot;: <a target="_blank" rel=nofollow href="http://drupal.org/project/modules?text=nodequeue">[link]</a> <br> <p>I don't see the oaiore module--you can download it from the &quot;install&quot; <br> page we put on our site, <a target="_blank" rel=nofollow href="http://jwa.org/technology/unlock/install">[link]</a> and <br> I will email the author of the module to see why it isn't online at

Mark Jordan mark2jor...@gmail.com 2009-12-15T22:13:33Z http://groups.google.com/group/oai-ore/browse_frm/thread/5fbf29ef6c6dda95/529b5017c9d232e2?show_docid=529b5017c9d232e2

Hi Ari, <br> <p>I can't find the modules on drupal.org -- can you point me in the right <br> direction? <br> <p>Mark