Re: Death Penalty is necessary.
Gray Ghost
news:a804g55bbo4nrteg0...@4ax.com:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:29:34 -0600, Ivan Skavinsky Skavar
><Iv...@borscht.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <bkh3g5phugvcnknjq...@4ax.com>,
>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:12:41 -0500, "tdny" <td...@live.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >http://www.cbsnews.com/elements/2009/11/16/crimesider/photoessay5670512
>>> >.shtml
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> It's expensive and useless as a deterrent.
>>
>>Can you actually quantify the capital crimes that did not occur because
>>of the death penalty? Maybe a poll of criminals?
>
> Study after study has shown it's not a deterrent. Look at states with
> the death penalty and those that don't and then tell me it's a
> deterrent.
>>
>>That's the only way to determine if it's "useful". As for expensive -
>>it's money that's spent here, on lawyers, and they pay taxes.
>>
>>Except for the ones in this administration :)
>
Who cares, I like to watch child molestors and child killers die. It really
should be more painful, though.
--
�Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel
of envy, its inherent value is the equal sharing of misery.� Winston
Churchill
Gray Ghost
209.197.15.171:
> Gray Ghost wrote:
>
>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>> news:a804g55bbo4nrteg0...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:29:34 -0600, Ivan Skavinsky Skavar
>>><Iv...@borscht.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <bkh3g5phugvcnknjq...@4ax.com>,
>>>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:12:41 -0500, "tdny" <td...@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >http://www.cbsnews.com/elements/2009/11/16/crimesider/photoessa
>>>>> >y5670512 .shtml
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> It's expensive and useless as a deterrent.
>>>>
>>>>Can you actually quantify the capital crimes that did not occur
>>>>because of the death penalty? Maybe a poll of criminals?
>>>
>>> Study after study has shown it's not a deterrent. Look at states
>>> with the death penalty and those that don't and then tell me it's a
>>> deterrent.
>>>>
>>>>That's the only way to determine if it's "useful". As for
>>>>expensive - it's money that's spent here, on lawyers, and they
>>>>pay taxes.
>>>>
>>>>Except for the ones in this administration :)
>>>
>>
>> Who cares, I like to watch child molestors and child killers die.
>> It really should be more painful, though.
>>
>
> One should actually be allowed to watch. It might enlighten some.
>
But only if they are proper executions. Shooting seems to fast. Hanging, I
hear, is pretty gruesome. As is well done electrocution.
My favorite would be to see them burned alive. Now that's biblical justice.
Slow, painful and a good warm up for his eternal future.
ne...@millions.com
>Gray Ghost wrote:
>
>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>> news:a804g55bbo4nrteg0...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:29:34 -0600, Ivan Skavinsky Skavar
>>><Iv...@borscht.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <bkh3g5phugvcnknjq...@4ax.com>,
>>>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:12:41 -0500, "tdny" <td...@live.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >http://www.cbsnews.com/elements/2009/11/16/crimesider/photoessa
>>>>> >y5670512 .shtml
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> It's expensive and useless as a deterrent.
>>>>
>>>>Can you actually quantify the capital crimes that did not occur
>>>>because of the death penalty? Maybe a poll of criminals?
>>>
>>> Study after study has shown it's not a deterrent. Look at states
>>> with the death penalty and those that don't and then tell me it's
>>> a deterrent.
>>>>
>>>>That's the only way to determine if it's "useful". As for
>>>>expensive - it's money that's spent here, on lawyers, and they
>>>>pay taxes.
>>>>
>>>>Except for the ones in this administration :)
>>>
>>
>> Who cares, I like to watch child molestors and child killers die.
>> It really should be more painful, though.
>>
>
>One should actually be allowed to watch. It might enlighten some.
In California, the death penalty only results in dying of old age.
DCI
stmarysbloodycunthole
wrote:
> Nobody <n...@home.anymore> wrote in news:Xns9CC5C33EDC23F204153245131@
> 209.197.15.171:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Gray Ghost wrote:
>
> >>news:a804g55bbo4nrteg0...@4ax.com:
>
> >>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:29:34 -0600, Ivan Skavinsky Skavar
>
> >>>>In article <bkh3g5phugvcnknjqpfa2q70ni8ulr1...@4ax.com>,
> >>>> Lookout <mrLook...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:12:41 -0500, "tdny" <t...@live.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> >http://www.cbsnews.com/elements/2009/11/16/crimesider/photoessa
> >>>>> >y5670512 .shtml
>
> >>>>> It's expensive and useless as a deterrent.
>
> >>>>Can you actually quantify the capital crimes that did not occur
> >>>>because of the death penalty? Maybe a poll of criminals?
>
> >>> Study after study has shown it's not a deterrent. Look at states
> >>> with the death penalty and those that don't and then tell me it's a
> >>> deterrent.
>
> >>>>That's the only way to determine if it's "useful". As for
> >>>>expensive - it's money that's spent here, on lawyers, and they
> >>>>pay taxes.
>
> >>>>Except for the ones in this administration :)
>
> >> Who cares, I like to watch child molestors and child killers die.
> >> It really should be more painful, though.
>
> > One should actually be allowed to watch. It might enlighten some.
>
> But only if they are proper executions. Shooting seems to fast. Hanging, I
> hear, is pretty gruesome. As is well done electrocution.
>
> My favorite would be to see them burned alive. Now that's biblical justice.
> Slow, painful and a good warm up for his eternal future.
>
> --
> “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel
> of envy, its inherent value is the equal sharing of misery.” Winston
>
> - Show quoted text -
DEATH PENALTY IS GOOD FOR SHEEP JESUS FUCKERS
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
>Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>news:a804g55bbo4nrteg0...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:29:34 -0600, Ivan Skavinsky Skavar
>><Iv...@borscht.com> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <bkh3g5phugvcnknjq...@4ax.com>,
>>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:12:41 -0500, "tdny" <td...@live.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >http://www.cbsnews.com/elements/2009/11/16/crimesider/photoessay5670512
>>>> >.shtml
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> It's expensive and useless as a deterrent.
>>>
>>>Can you actually quantify the capital crimes that did not occur because
>>>of the death penalty? Maybe a poll of criminals?
>>
>> Study after study has shown it's not a deterrent. Look at states with
>> the death penalty and those that don't and then tell me it's a
>> deterrent.
>>>
>>>That's the only way to determine if it's "useful". As for expensive -
>>>it's money that's spent here, on lawyers, and they pay taxes.
>>>
>>>Except for the ones in this administration :)
>>
>
>Who cares, I like to watch child molestors and child killers die. It really
>should be more painful, though.
You've never watched one. You're lying again.
Lookout
Which is why you've never amounted to anything in life. You're a sick
little fucker.
Gray Ghost
news:ba95g5d40hsdp8u2a...@4ax.com:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:08:04 -0600, grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com
> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>
>>Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>news:a804g55bbo4nrteg0...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:29:34 -0600, Ivan Skavinsky Skavar
>>><Iv...@borscht.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <bkh3g5phugvcnknjq...@4ax.com>,
>>>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:12:41 -0500, "tdny" <td...@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >http://www.cbsnews.com/elements/2009/11/16/crimesider/photoessay56705
>>>>> >12 .shtml
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> It's expensive and useless as a deterrent.
>>>>
>>>>Can you actually quantify the capital crimes that did not occur because
>>>>of the death penalty? Maybe a poll of criminals?
>>>
>>> Study after study has shown it's not a deterrent. Look at states with
>>> the death penalty and those that don't and then tell me it's a
>>> deterrent.
>>>>
>>>>That's the only way to determine if it's "useful". As for expensive -
>>>>it's money that's spent here, on lawyers, and they pay taxes.
>>>>
>>>>Except for the ones in this administration :)
>>>
>>
>>Who cares, I like to watch child molestors and child killers die. It
>>really should be more painful, though.
>
> You've never watched one. You're lying again.
>
Sorry, case. I'd like to watch child molestors and child killers die. It
really should be more painful, though.
But you knew that. You are to busy defending child rapists and child killers,
though. Any defense to save those vermin.
Gray Ghost
news:pb95g5ljfr8g14ugh...@4ax.com:
Says the vermin that defends child rapists and child killers.
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
Yes you lied. And on purpose. But we're used to that.
>
>But you knew that. You are to busy defending child rapists and child killers,
>though. Any defense to save those vermin.
Lying again. I never defended child rapists and killers.
See? You were wrong TWICE in one post. See how easy it is with your
help?
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
Nope, you're lying again.
Or..you could prove me wrong
SaPeIsMa
Alex DeLarge
Maybe if you volunteered...
Alex DeLarge
Maybe if you volunteered...
Alex DeLarge
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:25:32 -0500, "tdny" <td...@live.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Lookout" <mrLo...@yahoo.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.cbsnews.com/elements/2009/11/16/crimesider/photoessay5670512.shtml
>>
>>
>>> It's expensive and useless as a deterrent.
>>
>> conviction
>> and the one in the link above, is one of them.
>
> I agree.
>
>> Well, in the case of the DC Killer, John Allen Muhammed,
>> arrested on October 24, 2002, executed November 11, 2009.
>>
>> That was done in record time.
>>
>> http://www.serialkillerdatabase.net/dcsnipers.html
>
> But to say it's a deterrent isn't true.
> And it costs more than a life in prison, that's a fact.
Due to unnecessary appeals.
Alex DeLarge
Alex DeLarge
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:15:07 -0500, "tdny" <td...@live.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Lookout" <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:bkh3g5phugvcnknjq...@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>> It's expensive and useless as a deterrent.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igWbih3CiVo
>>
>>
>> Ted Bundy
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBpNz9RwZ-M
>>
>> Jeff Dahmer
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9unVL8c3lVo&feature=related
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul bernardo and Karla homolka murderers
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ebf7r_lnGmI
>>
>>
>> John Wayne Gacy
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ebf7r_lnGmI
>>
>> Dennis Radar - BTK Killer
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ebf7r_lnGmI
>>
> If you're trying to prove me wrong you failed miserably.
Fuck off and die.
Alex DeLarge
Fuck off and die.
Gray Ghost
news:hdugsi$l4t$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
> Lookout wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:08:04 -0600, grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com
>> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>>
>>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>> news:a804g55bbo4nrteg0...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:29:34 -0600, Ivan Skavinsky Skavar
>>>> <Iv...@borscht.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <bkh3g5phugvcnknjq...@4ax.com>,
>>>>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:12:41 -0500, "tdny" <td...@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.cbsnews.com/elements/2009/11/16/crimesider/photoessay5670
>>>>>>> 512 .shtml
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's expensive and useless as a deterrent.
>>>>> Can you actually quantify the capital crimes that did not occur
>>>>> because of the death penalty? Maybe a poll of criminals?
>>>> Study after study has shown it's not a deterrent. Look at states with
>>>> the death penalty and those that don't and then tell me it's a
>>>> deterrent.
>>>>> That's the only way to determine if it's "useful". As for expensive -
>>>>> it's money that's spent here, on lawyers, and they pay taxes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Except for the ones in this administration :)
>>> Who cares, I like to watch child molestors and child killers die. It
>>> really should be more painful, though.
>>
>> You've never watched one. You're lying again.
>
>
> Maybe if you volunteered...
>
Indeed, I volunteer Lookout to be the test subject. Noone would miss him.
Gray Ghost
news:j9d5g5p0a97utbhle...@4ax.com:
Well we already know your claims to be lies, so why should we believe this?
After all kiddie diddlers are usually cowards anyway and we have clearly
established you as a congenital coward incapable of manning up.
ne...@millions.com
wrote:
Death row inmates are not placed in general population. Instead, they
enjoy a good life and don't want to upset their excellent "living"
conditions.
DCI
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
You brought it up..why don't you volunteer.
Chicken shit.
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
So you can't prove I'm wrong.
So you're a liar.
>
>After all kiddie diddlers are usually cowards anyway and we have clearly
>established you as a congenital coward incapable of manning up.
AHAHAHAHAAH Calling me bad names again. Oh..that hurts!
AAAHAHAHAHHAAHAH
Duncan Patton a Campbell
Mebbe ur just another chicken-dick anonymoid
who won't put his money where his mouth is?
Dhu
--
Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu
Gray Ghost
news:9ea6g5l1r3mqo18sp...@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:46:25 -0600, grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com
> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>
>>Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote in
>>news:hdugsi$l4t$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>>
>>> Lookout wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:08:04 -0600, grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com
>>>> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:a804g55bbo4nrteg0...@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:29:34 -0600, Ivan Skavinsky Skavar
>>>>>> <Iv...@borscht.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <bkh3g5phugvcnknjq...@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:12:41 -0500, "tdny" <td...@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.cbsnews.com/elements/2009/11/16/crimesider/photoessay56
>>>>>>>>> 70 512 .shtml
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's expensive and useless as a deterrent.
>>>>>>> Can you actually quantify the capital crimes that did not occur
>>>>>>> because of the death penalty? Maybe a poll of criminals?
>>>>>> Study after study has shown it's not a deterrent. Look at states
>>>>>> with the death penalty and those that don't and then tell me it's a
>>>>>> deterrent.
>>>>>>> That's the only way to determine if it's "useful". As for expensive
>>>>>>> - it's money that's spent here, on lawyers, and they pay taxes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Except for the ones in this administration :)
>>>>> Who cares, I like to watch child molestors and child killers die. It
>>>>> really should be more painful, though.
>>>>
>>>> You've never watched one. You're lying again.
>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe if you volunteered...
>>>
>>
>>Indeed, I volunteer Lookout to be the test subject. Noone would miss him.
>
> You brought it up..why don't you volunteer.
becuase lieing cowards like you probably have better flareups and blacker
oilier smoke.
> Chicken shit.
>
Squawks the boy child that claimed to be on the radio, then changed his story
to used to be but still refuses to identify the station out of fear I might
"stalk" him.
Gray Ghost
news:gfa6g5hogp71fp247...@4ax.com:
Nope, I can't but you did.
First you claimed to be on the radio as a talk show host.
You wouldn't give us the station as you didn't want us calling un to harass
you.
Then it became you "used to be" on the radio. But you still wouldn't giuve us
the station ID because you're afraid I'm going to stalk you. As if I didn't
have more important things to do then harass the likes of you.
>>
>>After all kiddie diddlers are usually cowards anyway and we have clearly
>>established you as a congenital coward incapable of manning up.
>
> AHAHAHAHAAH Calling me bad names again. Oh..that hurts!
> AAAHAHAHAHHAAHAH
>
Thorazine wearing off?
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
Nope..never changed my story and when pressed you can't prove I did.
How ever we're still waiting for you to produce your college
transcript.
Come one chic hen shit. Are you gonna avoid this like you've avoided
serving your country? What a fucking pink punk you are.
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
You could. Go back and look. No doubt you have and you've learned you
were wrong AGAIN.
>
>First you claimed to be on the radio as a talk show host.
WAS on air. That's what I said.
>
>You wouldn't give us the station as you didn't want us calling un to harass
>you.
Nope. Never said I was afraid of calls. Can't happen when I wasn't on
any longer.
>Then it became you "used to be" on the radio. But you still wouldn't giuve us
>the station ID because you're afraid I'm going to stalk you. As if I didn't
>have more important things to do then harass the likes of you.
PROVE IT. Come on..what are you waiting for. It's all there. What's
your fucking problem, punk?
>
>>>
>>>After all kiddie diddlers are usually cowards anyway and we have clearly
>>>established you as a congenital coward incapable of manning up.
>>
>> AHAHAHAHAAH Calling me bad names again. Oh..that hurts!
>> AAAHAHAHAHHAAHAH
>>
>
>Thorazine wearing off?
Where's that college degree? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH You stupid, uneducated,
chicken shit, pink pussy punk.
Gray Ghost
news:ee47g5dssc4bsgmh1...@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:53:11 -0600, grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com
> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>
>>Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>news:9ea6g5l1r3mqo18sp...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:46:25 -0600, grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com
>>> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote in
>>>>news:hdugsi$l4t$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>
>>>>> Lookout wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:08:04 -0600,
>>>>>> grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:a804g55bbo4nrteg0...@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:29:34 -0600, Ivan Skavinsky Skavar
>>>>>>>> <Iv...@borscht.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <bkh3g5phugvcnknjq...@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:12:41 -0500, "tdny" <td...@live.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cbsnews.com/elements/2009/11/16/crimesider/photoessay
>>>>>>>>>>> 56 70 512 .shtml
Me? Are you serious? Not even a good dodge this time.
> Come one chic hen shit. Are you gonna avoid this like you've avoided
> serving your country? What a fucking pink punk you are.
>
No sorry, dodger fan. The subject is: You uncritical acceptance of Obama's
refusal to release his school records and your continued insistence that he
is snarter than Bush and Palin whn in fact there is no objective measure
available.
One does have to question the honesty of a buffoon that accepts an obvious
lie or does not hold his guy up to the asme level of scrutiny that he applies
to his opponents.
Seems cheap and dishonest. Like your lie about being a talk show host.
Gray Ghost
news:th47g59hu205tr14v...@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >sa y5670512 .shtml
Did you say was an airhead?
>>
>>You wouldn't give us the station as you didn't want us calling un to
>>harass you.
>
> Nope. Never said I was afraid of calls. Can't happen when I wasn't on
> any longer.
>
Yes you did.
>>Then it became you "used to be" on the radio. But you still wouldn't
>>giuve us the station ID because you're afraid I'm going to stalk you. As
>>if I didn't have more important things to do then harass the likes of
>>you.
>
> PROVE IT. Come on..what are you waiting for. It's all there. What's
> your fucking problem, punk?
Prove what? That you're an arrogant, lieing turd?
>>
>>>>
>>>>After all kiddie diddlers are usually cowards anyway and we have
>>>>clearly established you as a congenital coward incapable of manning up.
>>>
>>> AHAHAHAHAAH Calling me bad names again. Oh..that hurts!
>>> AAAHAHAHAHHAAHAH
>>>
>>
>>Thorazine wearing off?
>
> Where's that college degree? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH You stupid, uneducated,
> chicken shit, pink pussy punk.
It's in the same folder as Obama's degree. When we see his I'll show you
mine.
Then again i'm not running for the most important job in the world. And I'm
not promising "full disclosure" and then not delivering it.
And I don't claim to be a talk show host.
And what's with the pink? You got a problem with homosexuals? The correct
color for cowards is yellow. Like your pee stained underwear.
Oh no. Now I've done it, I've sunk to your level. Pathetic. Well, fuck off
for a bit I need a pallette cleanser.
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
Prove it's a lie.
And where is your college transcript, lying punk?
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
Nah..all you're doing is proving you went back and looked and found
out I'm right.
>
>>>
>>>You wouldn't give us the station as you didn't want us calling un to
>>>harass you.
>>
>> Nope. Never said I was afraid of calls. Can't happen when I wasn't on
>> any longer.
>>
>
>Yes you did.
I said I was afraid that some nut like you would stalk me. Lying punk.
>>>Then it became you "used to be" on the radio. But you still wouldn't
>>>giuve us the station ID because you're afraid I'm going to stalk you. As
>>>if I didn't have more important things to do then harass the likes of
>>>you.
>>
>> PROVE IT. Come on..what are you waiting for. It's all there. What's
>> your fucking problem, punk?
>
>Prove what? That you're an arrogant, lieing turd?
Show your college transcript and I'll show mine
>>>>>After all kiddie diddlers are usually cowards anyway and we have
>>>>>clearly established you as a congenital coward incapable of manning up.
>>>>
>>>> AHAHAHAHAAH Calling me bad names again. Oh..that hurts!
>>>> AAAHAHAHAHHAAHAH
>>>>
>>>
>>>Thorazine wearing off?
>>
>> Where's that college degree? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH You stupid, uneducated,
>> chicken shit, pink pussy punk.
>
>It's in the same folder as Obama's degree. When we see his I'll show you
>mine.
His degree isn't doubt you jackass.
Columbia University - B.A. political science with a specialization in
international relations.
Harvard - Juris Doctor (J.D.) Magna Cum Laude
Those are fact you dilweed
>Then again i'm not running for the most important job in the world. And I'm
>not promising "full disclosure" and then not delivering it.
>
>And I don't claim to be a talk show host.
>
>And what's with the pink? You got a problem with homosexuals? The correct
>color for cowards is yellow. Like your pee stained underwear.
Who said anything about homosexuals? That really seems to be on your
mind a lot. Is there a closet door opening?
>
>Oh no. Now I've done it, I've sunk to your level. Pathetic. Well, fuck off
>for a bit I need a pallette cleanser.
You sunk to your own level all by yourself. But like most
conservatives you have to blame someone else for your actions.
So where's that college degree? Hmmmmm
You fucking chicken shit. You never went to college at all. You're
lying again.
Gray Ghost
news:imt7g51flf0mf01rg...@4ax.com:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:04:52 -0600, grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com
> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>
>>Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>news:ee47g5dssc4bsgmh1...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:53:11 -0600, grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com
>>> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>>news:9ea6g5l1r3mqo18sp...@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:46:25 -0600,
>>>>> grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Alex DeLarge <kor...@milk.bar> wrote in
>>>>>>news:hdugsi$l4t$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lookout wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:08:04 -0600,
>>>>>>>> grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:a804g55bbo4nrteg0...@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:29:34 -0600, Ivan Skavinsky Skavar
>>>>>>>>>> <Iv...@borscht.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <bkh3g5phugvcnknjq...@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:12:41 -0500, "tdny" <td...@live.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cbsnews.com/elements/2009/11/16/crimesider/photoess
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ay 56 70 512 .shtml
With Obama's, yellow stain.
Gray Ghost
news:2ot7g559ju841m5r4...@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >es sa y5670512 .shtml
Afraid of what? You clearly don't think much of me. I live 2 states away. My
welfare check won't cover the gas to get to Alabama. What re you afraid of,
yellow stain?
>
>>>>Then it became you "used to be" on the radio. But you still wouldn't
>>>>giuve us the station ID because you're afraid I'm going to stalk you.
>>>>As if I didn't have more important things to do then harass the likes
>>>>of you.
>>>
>>> PROVE IT. Come on..what are you waiting for. It's all there. What's
>>> your fucking problem, punk?
>>
>>Prove what? That you're an arrogant, lieing turd?
>
> Show your college transcript and I'll show mine
It may surprise you to hear this but I don't give a crap what YOUR college
transcript says. You aren't important enough to matter.
>
>>>>>>After all kiddie diddlers are usually cowards anyway and we have
>>>>>>clearly established you as a congenital coward incapable of manning
>>>>>>up.
>>>>>
>>>>> AHAHAHAHAAH Calling me bad names again. Oh..that hurts!
>>>>> AAAHAHAHAHHAAHAH
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thorazine wearing off?
>>>
>>> Where's that college degree? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH You stupid, uneducated,
>>> chicken shit, pink pussy punk.
>>
>>It's in the same folder as Obama's degree. When we see his I'll show you
>>mine.
>
> His degree isn't doubt you jackass.
> Columbia University - B.A. political science with a specialization in
> international relations.
>
> Harvard - Juris Doctor (J.D.) Magna Cum Laude
>
> Those are fact you dilweed
>
Facts unsupported by hard evidence. No transcript, no degree.
>>Then again i'm not running for the most important job in the world. And
>>I'm not promising "full disclosure" and then not delivering it.
>>
>>And I don't claim to be a talk show host.
>>
>>And what's with the pink? You got a problem with homosexuals? The correct
>>color for cowards is yellow. Like your pee stained underwear.
>
> Who said anything about homosexuals? That really seems to be on your
> mind a lot. Is there a closet door opening?
>>
>>Oh no. Now I've done it, I've sunk to your level. Pathetic. Well, fuck
>>off for a bit I need a pallette cleanser.
>
> You sunk to your own level all by yourself. But like most
> conservatives you have to blame someone else for your actions.
>
> So where's that college degree? Hmmmmm
>
Thge question is where is Obama's? Nice that you can't stay focused. Is that
because of drugs, alcohol or senility?
> You fucking chicken shit. You never went to college at all. You're
> lying again.
>
Really and you can prove that, how?
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
Yup..afraid of stalkers.
So where's that prove that I was on air currently?
And where's your college degree?
Is this were you filter me like klaus and gummer did..when I caught
you lying so many times you finally give up?
>>>>>Then it became you "used to be" on the radio. But you still wouldn't
>>>>>giuve us the station ID because you're afraid I'm going to stalk you.
>>>>>As if I didn't have more important things to do then harass the likes
>>>>>of you.
>>>>
>>>> PROVE IT. Come on..what are you waiting for. It's all there. What's
>>>> your fucking problem, punk?
>>>
>>>Prove what? That you're an arrogant, lieing turd?
>>
>> Show your college transcript and I'll show mine
>
>It may surprise you to hear this but I don't give a crap what YOUR college
>transcript says. You aren't important enough to matter.
YOU challenged me. I said ok. So..produce your college transcript. If
you don't then we all know you were lying AGAIN.
Try to back out of a challenge, coward? What are you afraid of?
>>>>>>>After all kiddie diddlers are usually cowards anyway and we have
>>>>>>>clearly established you as a congenital coward incapable of manning
>>>>>>>up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AHAHAHAHAAH Calling me bad names again. Oh..that hurts!
>>>>>> AAAHAHAHAHHAAHAH
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Thorazine wearing off?
>>>>
>>>> Where's that college degree? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH You stupid, uneducated,
>>>> chicken shit, pink pussy punk.
>>>
>>>It's in the same folder as Obama's degree. When we see his I'll show you
>>>mine.
>>
>> His degree isn't doubt you jackass.
>> Columbia University - B.A. political science with a specialization in
>> international relations.
>>
>> Harvard - Juris Doctor (J.D.) Magna Cum Laude
>>
>> Those are fact you dilweed
>>
>
>Facts unsupported by hard evidence. No transcript, no degree.
His transcripts were provided you dork. It was his thesis that they
couldn't find. But I guess all the kiddie porn and cheap welfare rot
gut has screwed up your memory.
>
>>>Then again i'm not running for the most important job in the world. And
>>>I'm not promising "full disclosure" and then not delivering it.
No..but you did challenge me. I accepted. So where is your transcript?
>>>And I don't claim to be a talk show host.
I did and I was.
>>>And what's with the pink? You got a problem with homosexuals? The correct
>>>color for cowards is yellow. Like your pee stained underwear.
>>
>> Who said anything about homosexuals? That really seems to be on your
>> mind a lot. Is there a closet door opening?
>>>
>>>Oh no. Now I've done it, I've sunk to your level. Pathetic. Well, fuck
>>>off for a bit I need a pallette cleanser.
>>
>> You sunk to your own level all by yourself. But like most
>> conservatives you have to blame someone else for your actions.
>>
>> So where's that college degree? Hmmmmm
>>
>
>Thge question is where is Obama's? Nice that you can't stay focused. Is that
>because of drugs, alcohol or senility?
YOU brought Obama into this you idiot. His degrees aren't in question.
>> You fucking chicken shit. You never went to college at all. You're
>> lying again.
>>
>
>Really and you can prove that, how?
So then prove it and make good on your challenge. Produce your
transcript. What are you afraid of?
You're a punk ass ignorant coward.
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
This isn't about Obama's which is a fact. He went to Harvard and it
was provided long ago.
But this wasn't about Obama. YOU challenged me. So are you backing out
coward? Or were you lying again? Is that it? If you can't produce it
after you challenged me the only explanation would be that you were
lying.
AHAHAHAHAHA you fucked yourself! AAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Alex DeLarge
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:21:07 -0500, Obwon <Ob...@real.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:18:36 -0600, Lookout
>> <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:07:08 -0500, "tdny" <td...@live.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Lookout" <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:maa6g5hli5elkor0e...@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:43:37 -0500, "tdny" <td...@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Lookout" <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:dvc5g5pt3atsc150j...@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:32:42 -0500, "tdny" <td...@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Lookout" <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:a804g55bbo4nrteg0...@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:29:34 -0600, Ivan Skavinsky Skavar
>>>>>>>>> <Iv...@borscht.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article <bkh3g5phugvcnknjq...@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:12:41 -0500, "tdny" <td...@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cbsnews.com/elements/2009/11/16/crimesider/photoessay5670512.shtml
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's expensive and useless as a deterrent.
>>>>>>>>>> Can you actually quantify the capital crimes that did not occur
>>>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>>> of the death penalty? Maybe a poll of criminals?
>>>>>>>>> Study after study has shown it's not a deterrent. Look at states with
>>>>>>>>> the death penalty and those that don't and then tell me it's a
>>>>>>>>> deterrent.
>>>>>>>>>> That's the only way to determine if it's "useful". As for expensive -
>>>>>>>>>> it's money that's spent here, on lawyers, and they pay taxes.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Except for the ones in this administration :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it doesn't matter if it acts as a deterrent.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Death Penalty in such a case, for the mom that sold the 5 year old
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> the killer,
>>>>>>>> and the killer, is the only fair outcome, nothing else will do.
>>>>>>> We don't know enough about that case yet.
>>>>>> No, we don't.
>>>>>> I'm jumping the gun here, because I have had such a horrible reaction to
>>>>>> this story.
>>>>>> We are talking about a 5 year old child.
>>>>>> And that man is carrying her in his arms, in a motel room.
>>>>>> But if all the ducks are in a row, and he's it and that mom sold her to
>>>>>> him,
>>>>>> that's it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would you have any objections to the application of the DP in a case such
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> this?
>>>>> Those are not all the facts.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't like the DP either, because of the possiblity of error, of killing
>>>>>> an innocent human being.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But in an airtight case, when everything fits, you got the right party and
>>>>>> it is something like this,
>>>>>> that involves a child, would you still object?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would not .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's hard, I know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But gee, that 5 year old didn't deserve that, she just didn't.
>>>>> The victims age should have nothing to do with it. The verdict MUST be
>>>>> reached based on cold hard facts and not emotion. That's in every
>>>>> judges order to the jury I've read about in cases like this. You need
>>>>> to do the same.
>>>> Okay, you do have a valid point.
>>>> Wait, until the process takes its toll.
>>>>
>>>> But I don't think, you're right, when you say that the victims age has
>>>> nothing to do with it.
>>>> It does influence people, from the cop that makes the collar, to the ADA
>>>> that prosecutes the case,
>>>> and the judge and jury.
>>>> Even if it is unconscious, the victims age counts.
>>> No doubt. And if I were on jury for a case like this no doubt when we
>>> went into deliberation the others would want to kill me when I
>>> reminded them of what the judge said.
>> And what of the less dramatic cases?
>
> Be more specific
Specifically - DROP DAMNED DEAD!
Alex DeLarge
> You're a punk ass ignorant coward.
You're a raving libitard felcher.
Alex DeLarge
> You're a punk ass ignorant coward.
You're a raving libitard felcher.
Gray Ghost
news:vu98g59enn5fokhkk...@4ax.com:
> YOU challenged me. I said ok. So..produce your college transcript. If
> you don't then we all know you were lying AGAIN.
>
> Try to back out of a challenge, coward? What are you afraid of?
>
Actually, no, I didn't challenge you. Just pointed out you are a hated filled
idiot and hypocrite.
Gray Ghost
news:vu98g59enn5fokhkk...@4ax.com:
> His transcripts were provided you dork. It was his thesis that they
> couldn't find. But I guess all the kiddie porn and cheap welfare rot
> gut has screwed up your memory
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_were_Barack_Obama%27s_grades_in_college
Barack Obama has not released transcripts for his grades from Occidental
College, Columbia University and Harvard Law. He has also not released his
SAT and LSAT scores. No explanation has been offered for not releasing them.
Obama must have had very average grades in high school since he only ended up
at the moderately competitive Occidental College. With affirmative action,
even an average set of grades would have gotten him into a more competitive
undergraduate institution. In fact, for unknown reasons he did not apply as a
graduate of the school he attended in Hawaii, but as a foreign transfer
student from Indonesia. One possible reason for hiding his record in Hawaii
is that he admits cutting class and doing drugs for most of his time in high
school. It's also hard to gauge his academic turnaround since no one at
Columbia University seems to have known him and both Obama and Columbia
refuse to release his transcripts, compared with say, George Bush, whose
undergraduate transcript you can see here.
http://www.americanpolitics.com/bushtranscript.html.
Per the Wall Street Journal September 11, 2008, "Obama's Lost Years," Obama
graduated from Columbia University (to which he transferred after his first
two years at Occidental College in California), with a degree in Political
Science without honors, so had a GPA less than a 3.3. His roomate Sohale
Siddiqi indicated Obama itially felt alienated, felt "very lost," and used
drugs to get high, which could have led to low grades initially. The roommate
indicates that he then turned serious and "stopped getting high." Obama
transferred to Columbia because he was concerned with urban issues. Based on
his overall undergraduate GPA of less than a 3.3, Mr. Obama's admission to
Harvard Law School may reflect affirmative action statutes, low grades early,
then higher grades later (purely speculation) and/or other factors.
At Harvard Law School, Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude, which, according to
the Harvard Law School website, is awarded to the top 10% of Harvard Law
School students. Once again, without a transcript indicating which classes
and professors he chose it is hard to judge the significance of a high class
standing. Harvard, like most Ivy League schools has classes specially
designed to allow various segments of the population to excel.
Also at Harvard Law School, Obama was accepted as one of 85-90 Editors of the
Harvard Law Review. However, because of changes in the Law Review's policies
a few years earlier to insure proper "diversity" among the law review staff,
half were not chosen on the basis of grades. Obama was elected President of
the Law Review, as a compromise candidate among 21 others running, and which
according to a Harvard Law spokesperson is not based at all on academics, but
on other measures as would occur in any club.
Gray Ghost
news:vu98g59enn5fokhkk...@4ax.com:
> His transcripts were provided you dork. It was his thesis that they
> couldn't find. But I guess all the kiddie porn and cheap welfare rot
> gut has screwed up your memory
Perhaps you would provide a link then. My searches returned nothing but
people questioning why he hasn't and a hoax that his Occidental records were
(debunked by Snopes).
Gotcha now Dilbert. I'm going to save this one. You are fried.
Gray Ghost
news:uba8g5tumujceb2hl...@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ss ay 56 70 512 .shtml
Really, and where can I find a copy of those transcripts?
> But this wasn't about Obama. YOU challenged me. So are you backing out
> coward? Or were you lying again? Is that it? If you can't produce it
> after you challenged me the only explanation would be that you were
> lying.
You're right, it's about your stupid bravado and lies.
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
Go look it up.
>
>
>> But this wasn't about Obama. YOU challenged me. So are you backing out
>> coward? Or were you lying again? Is that it? If you can't produce it
>> after you challenged me the only explanation would be that you were
>> lying.
>
>You're right, it's about your stupid bravado and lies.
Where are YOUR transcripts. YOU changed it to Obama when I agree to
your challenge. YOU chickened out as usual. YOU lied as usual.
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
>Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>news:vu98g59enn5fokhkk...@4ax.com:
>
>> YOU challenged me. I said ok. So..produce your college transcript. If
>> you don't then we all know you were lying AGAIN.
>>
>> Try to back out of a challenge, coward? What are you afraid of?
>>
>
>Actually, no, I didn't challenge you. Just pointed out you are a hated filled
>idiot and hypocrite.
Still waiting chicken shit. Where's your college transcript you
claimed to have?
Are you saying that you didn't claim to have one? Is that it?
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
>Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>news:vu98g59enn5fokhkk...@4ax.com:
>
>> His transcripts were provided you dork. It was his thesis that they
>> couldn't find. But I guess all the kiddie porn and cheap welfare rot
>> gut has screwed up your memory
>
>http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_were_Barack_Obama%27s_grades_in_college
>
>Barack Obama has not released transcripts for his grades from Occidental
>College, Columbia University and Harvard Law. He has also not released his
>SAT and LSAT scores. No explanation has been offered for not releasing them.
Undergrad? Who cares. He's a lawyer. With a degree.
So prove you have one, chicken shit.
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
>Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>news:vu98g59enn5fokhkk...@4ax.com:
>
This isn't about Obama. This is about YOUR claim that you wanted to
compare YOUR college transcript to mine. I'm still waiting for you to
produce yours chicken shit.
Gray Ghost
news:q449g5dem09vndsj3...@4ax.com:
>>> This isn't about Obama's which is a fact. He went to Harvard and it was
>>> provided long ago.
>>
>>Really, and where can I find a copy of those transcripts?
>
> Go look it up.
Well i spent a bit time already "Obama college transcripts" in Google and
Yahoo. Nada, nothing, zip, zero.
As I said before all I get is articles where the author is questioning why
Obama hasn't released them, some hoax stories that they were FOIAed from
Occidental and various silly aspersions based on the "fact", and references
to the Snopes article debunking the supposed Occiental trasncript release.
in fact Snopes notes that none of Obama's trasnscripts have been released in
declaring the Occidental story false.
Sooo, is Snopes lieing? Are Google and Yahoo conspiring to hide those
transcripts by making my searches turn up no references to the actual
transcripts, just the articles I listed? Go ahead try it yourself. Maybe I'm
doing the searches wrong. Maybe I'm to stupid to enter the search terms
correctly. Go ahead prove that I did something wrong. Give us a link to where
the transcripts are posted on the web.
And while you're at it you might want to have a look for John Kerry's
military records, they don't seem to be available either, while Bush's and
McCain's were. What is it with the Democrats, they always claim to be so
honest and yet somehow these little details eem to elude them. And then thier
idiot lackeys defend them. Amazing.
--
Lookout
YOU brought up Obama after I accepted your challenge. I don't give a
shit about someone's transcripts when they have a law degree.
BACK TO YOUR CHALLENGE! You produce YOUR college transcripts as
promises and I'll post mine. Come one you lying punk...do it or eat
your words AGAIN.
This is why gummer and klaus gave up..I proved they lied so many
times they couldn't stand to see my posts..they GAVE UP. The gave up
because the lied...just as you have.
AHAHAHAHHAAH You lose you lying coward.
Jake Havoc
> Which is why I think the death penalty should only be used for murder
> cases and then the case has to be
Get this through your head, child.
NO ONE GIVES A FLYING FUCK WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT _ANYTHING_!!!
You are a spammer, a scumbag, a left-wing looney, and a despicable piece
of shit, capisce?
Alex DeLarge
> You make sensible points.
He's almost as insane as you are troofer.
Go fuck a goat.
Jake Havoc
>...we must not execute
> one innocent man. We must take ever action possible to make sure that
> doesn't happen.
Go buy a fucking violin and cry me a river, cunt.
Obwon
Then it is you who are in favor of putting innocent people
to death, to be sure that you can kill those you feel are
deserving of death. In short, you don't mind seeing
innocent people executed for crimes they did not commit!
Alex DeLarge
> Any value the death penalty might gain, from the
> executions of even a million "John Wayne Gaceys", does not
> equal or supercede the value lossed by the execution of one
> innocent man.
Why yes, it truly does, you insane rhetorical nitwit!
Are you on drugs?
Alex DeLarge
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:48:44 -0700, Jake Havoc
> <nu...@void.net> wrote:
>
>> Lookout wrote:
>>> ...we must not execute
>>> one innocent man. We must take ever action possible to make sure that
>>> doesn't happen.
>> Go buy a fucking violin and cry me a river, cunt.
>
> Then it is you who are in favor of putting innocent people
> to death,
Look, it'd be fine if you went down, true...but I thought the modifier
was "innocent " people...