Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Beautiful Woman (picture post) bw20.jpg[1/1]

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Cliff Pratt

unread,
Feb 22, 1998, 3:00:00 AM2/22/98
to

David Farrar wrote
>
>There is no problem with people posting pron to Usenet, only that they
>should post them in the "porn" groups, not to all 30,000 groups on
>Usenet.

We definitely need more pron on Usenet. However I am totally
opposed to porn.

Cliff

judy

unread,
Feb 23, 1998, 3:00:00 AM2/23/98
to

David Farrar wrote:

> A long time ago (specifically on Sun, 22 Feb 1998 02:11:49 +1300) in a
>
> galaxy far far away (nz.reg.dunedin.general) Peter Watson wrote: in
> <6cmjpk$1fm$1...@newsource.ihug.co.nz>:
>
> >
> >
> >>Ahem, putting aside my normal modesty, but I can claim this as
> another
> >>kill - I'm now at 199 :-)
> > Gosh David, thanks for the censorship.
> >
>
> I can't tell if you are joking like Dave McL so I'll reply seriously.
>
> The complaint was lodged not because it is porn per se, but because
> the poster spammed it to multiple newsgroups where it breached the
> charters, and also as it was a binary post in a non binary group.


>
> There is no problem with people posting pron to Usenet, only that they
>
> should post them in the "porn" groups, not to all 30,000 groups on

> Usenet. Think if everyone did this - all the groups would become
> unreadable.
>
> DPF
>
>

Gee! I think I'm glad I missed it. --
Bye,
Judith

0 new messages