1. "Global Warming" is Man-Made after all.
There is a colossal scandal erupting in the blogosphere, and in the better
media. Someone, probably an insider offended by what he saw was going on,
leaked a large volume of emails from within the global warming priesthood
centred within the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia,
UK.
These show a pattern of manipulation, suppression and selection of data and
evidence all designed to create and maintain the global warming myth.
So now we know - Global Warming is man-made after all - it is created by a
small group of dedicated believers posing as scientists using manufactured
data, selected statistics, dodgy computer models and "mates reviewed"
papers.
No one has fully assessed what it all means yet, but for a flavour of what
will be revealed see:
<http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/20/climate-cuttings-33.html>
http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/20/climate-cuttings-33.html
And also:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17102
Sceptical, Gullible or Devious?
"In the global warming spectrum there are three groups - the realists, the
alarmists, and those serving other agendas and interests.
"The realists are sceptical, the alarmists are gullible and the vested
interests are devious.
"Sceptical" is a more worthy position than "gullible" or "devious".
Viv Forbes, Carbon Sense Coalition, Australia Nov 2009
All of this supports what "Carbon Sense" and many others have been saying
for ages - we need an independent enquiry into the science. That will
probably find that man has no control over the climate, and all that the
Cap-n-Tax scheme will do is destroy jobs, profits and future prosperity.
For a comment on the rise of the Unsceptical Scientists, see:
<http://joannenova.com.au/2009/11/the-rise-of-the-unskeptical-scientist/>
http://joannenova.com.au/2009/11/the-rise-of-the-unskeptical-scientist/
stickers
2. It's all about Cash
The global warming campaign is not about climate, or pollution, or energy
conservation - it is overwhelmingly about CASH.
Cash income for government wastrels who have trouble balancing their books
and funding their election bribes; cash profits for bankers, traders and
speculators in the permit trading game; cash receipts for carbon credit
harvesters; cash subsidies for those manufacturing and installing
alternative energy playthings; cash foreign aid in "climate compensation"
for failed ("less developed") states; cash windfalls for countries like
Russia from selling their surplus emissions permits; cash investments from
refugee industries seeking carbon tax asylum in places like China and India;
cash research grants for sycophant academics; and cash welfare handouts for
"lower income supplicants".
Where does all this cash come from? From obvious and underhand carbon taxes,
"environmental" fees and emission permit fees funded from increased energy
and food costs. The cost will fall on every consumer and every shareholder.
Everyone who manages a weekly budget or a retirement nest-egg should be very
afraid of what these dangerous people are planning.
If you want to understand why something with fragile scientific support gets
such massive media and political support, just ask "Cui bono?" - Who
benefits?
Jo Nova puts it well: 'Global Bullies want your money". See:
<http://joannenova.com.au/2009/11/skeptics-handbook-ii-global-bullies-want-y
our-money/>
http://joannenova.com.au/2009/11/skeptics-handbook-ii-global-bullies-want-yo
ur-money/
3. Last Chance to shore up the Liberal Party and Defeat Cap-n-Tax
The Malcolm Rudd/Penny Macfarlane Cap-n-Tax Scheme will probably be voted on
early next week. The outcome depends mainly on the Liberal Senators. Now is
the last chance to encourage the rapidly growing band of climate realists
including Nick Minchin, Cory Bernardi, Julian McGauran, Tony Abbott, Dennis
Jensen, and Christopher Back. They join the strong Nationals led by Barnaby
Joyce and Ron Boswell in the senate who long ago took a stance opposing any
version of an ETS. They saw the sense and the political benefits in opposing
every ETS as the public awakens to the reality that carbon demonisation is a
baseless scam. The public is waking up fast, and it is becoming a worried
and angry electorate.
There are also closet climate realists in the ALP. Soon the stronger of them
will have to come out and defend workers and consumers
Every little bit helps. Politics is a numbers game, so please add to the
numbers opposing any form of Cap-n-Tax Scheme. Write and/or phone your local
member, senator and party machine and make sure they understand we will work
to unseat everyone who votes for this legislation. Write to you local paper,
ring talk back radio. Like Horatius on the bridge, we few amateurs are
opposing the massed phalanxes of well funded Green Warriors looking to
pillage our economy, grab power over our lives and set up their new world
empire.
And for another assessment of those tricky people exposed in Climategate
see:
<http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/11/21/crus-climate-tricksters-context-is-
everything/>
http://www.globalwarming.org/2009/11/21/crus-climate-tricksters-context-is-e
verything/
Viv Forbes
November 2009
<http://www.carbon-sense.com> www.carbon-sense.com
"Carbon Sense" is a newsletter produced by the Carbon Sense Coalition, an
Australian based organisation which opposes waste of resources, opposes
pollution, and promotes the rational and sustainable use of carbon energy
and carbon food.
Please spread "Carbon Sense" around.
For more information visit our web site at <http://www.carbon-sense.com/>
www.carbon-sense.com
Literary, financial or other contributions to help our cause are welcomed.
Viv Forbes MS 23, Rosewood Qld 4340 Australia.
<mailto:in...@carbon-sense.com> in...@carbon-sense.com 07 5464 0533
To Unsubscribe send a reply with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line.
Expect this to be ignored by most of the mainstream media. TV3 already
has, don't know about TV1 yet.
So far the only mainstream media outlets to have reported on it that I
know of have been Fox News and The Telegraph, with Fox News taking a
safe 'skeptics say' approach.
Someone should ask TV3 why they're ignoring a major news story. Could
it be because it goes against their pro-AGW stance?
Did Gore win the 2000 election? It seem to come down to Florida
and a few districts in Miami where a Democrat controlling committee
brought voting equipment that let them 'choose' the winner. An
for a 'fee' allegedly they did, Bush won.
Did these Global warming scientists exaggerate or make up the results?
Well we're not going to know if we concentrate on what these scientists
did or didn't do without some credible scientists. No? Nobody wants
to front? Scientists shut door on you when you went looking?
Now if you believe they just made it up for career advantage, not to
save the planet by exaggeration because that would still mean they
were concerned and need to push the truth, then you must believe they'd
ruin their careers to well advance their careers. The only other
explanation, well to a convinced anti human global warming (humans are
too weak and dumb to kick the climate around type) is that they were
paid to salt the science.
Now let's think who has lots of money being thrown at the issue!
Oh, yeah a lot of people who don't want to pay a carbon credit tax
and who can easily afford to pay some scientists to retire wealthy.
Its not like any scientist can't see, we are doing nothing to stop
climate change, so might as well live it up while the climate is nice!