Luckily, perhaps, they have a large marketing budget, but I think the
problem they have created for themselves will take some time to repair.
For what it's worth, and I wish to point out I'm not a big chocolate
fancier, the dairy milk tastes.. wrong.. to me now, maybe mind over
matter, maybe I have become used to the different brand(s) I have moved
to, maybe I never really liked dairy milk, whatever the reason, I for
one won't be spending any money with them, for a while yet anyway.
Best chocolate albeit a tad expensive that i've tasted lately - Mocha
chocolate from Trade Aid...OMGGGG to die for...give it a go.
S
Nor I. Too sweet
Good old Porirua Whittakers is doing very well at present
I have recently become enamoured of Green and Blacks dark milk
chocolate, it is delicious.
Nah i scoff too much if i buy dairy milk... the richer the better..don't eat
so much :D
S
Green and Blacks is owned by Cadbury.
Miche
--
Electricians do it in three phases
No its not, cocoa has still dropped in the new small blocks without palm
oil. Its one step above fundrasing crap and no brand service station
muck now. Lindt forever IMO.
>
> Luckily, perhaps, they have a large marketing budget, but I think the
> problem they have created for themselves will take some time to repair.
Their other stuff is gone to crap as well
Its been a bad 18 months for nz candy, killed off some nz faves, the
choc fuckup and then the current problem with eclairs and minites going
offshore.
> For what it's worth, and I wish to point out I'm not a big chocolate
> fancier, the dairy milk tastes.. wrong.. to me now, maybe mind over
> matter, maybe I have become used to the different brand(s) I have moved
> to, maybe I never really liked dairy milk, whatever the reason, I for
> one won't be spending any money with them, for a while yet anyway.
IMO dairymilk has always been bad. No cocoa taste, virtually a milk
chocolate. And that tastes about as nice as the crust that accumulates
around the top of a milk bottle to me.
So why don't Cadbury brand make such nice chocolate?
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/3084371/Moro-production-to-move-to-Australia
And moro bars.
>> For what it's worth, and I wish to point out I'm not a big chocolate
>> fancier, the dairy milk tastes.. wrong.. to me now, maybe mind over
>> matter, maybe I have become used to the different brand(s) I have
>> moved to, maybe I never really liked dairy milk, whatever the reason,
>> I for one won't be spending any money with them, for a while yet anyway.
>
> IMO dairymilk has always been bad. No cocoa taste, virtually a milk
> chocolate. And that tastes about as nice as the crust that accumulates
> around the top of a milk bottle to me.
I used to like it, but, now, I'd agree with Kerry, it's too sweet.
Cadburys is a comparatively cheap brand, and if you just want a large bar
for your money it will do nicely.
Look at it as the "Warehouse" of the chocolate world.
Would you rather eat the fancy dishes they produce on Masterchef, or a huge
plate of good fish and chips?
There is a lot to be said for an unsophisticated palate.
"De gustibus non est disputandum."
Ah, thought so. The first time I came across I looked at the fancy
cardboard box and noted - surprise surprise - that they had the same
address in Dunedin as Cadbury.
At the time it looked like an attempt to capture a slice of the
imported chocolates market with something that looked flash while
taking the Cadbury brand downmarket.
LW
Give me a packet of dark-roasted coffee beans coated in high-cocoa
dark chocolate. . . provided someone else is paying.
LW
Oops. meant white chocolate.
The blocks are very pale compared to other milk chocolates
If it contains cocoa butter it's chocolate, even if it's white.
It tastes vile though.
Yes Whittakers is good chocolate and their dark varieties are very good.
>
> I have recently become enamoured of Green and Blacks dark milk
> chocolate, it is delicious.
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:37:28 +1300, Petito wrote:
>
>>> Chocolate without cocoa is hardly "chocolate".
>>
>> If it contains cocoa butter it's chocolate, even if it's white. It
>> tastes vile though.
>
> Is it chocolate if it contains 2% cocoa?
To be called Chocolate it must contain cocoa solids this can be powder or
butter or both.
An interesting read on the subject can be found at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_chocolate
A L P
> Be that as it may. Is it "chocolate" if it contains only, say, 2% cocoa in any form?
Ok just watched the "What's really in our food" one on chocolate
According to them
Chocolate must contain at least 20% cocoa solids (can be cocoa powder or
butter or both) also MUST NOT contain MORE than 5% oils other than cocoa
butter or dairy fat. so 2% no but white chocolate can be called chocolate
because it has at least 20% cocoa butter in it.