When It first happened I posted a please tell message here but know
one who knew dared reveal who was behind the perversions.
Google groups is changing into a pack of snubby nose posers .
Unless I missed a link to who were the recent high profile sex
offenders.
This is very different from the [police] putting up in supermarkets
and advertising a big list of sex offenders and where they live.
How dare a judge convict a sex offender finding him guilty and have
the audacity to hide his name.
In other words allowing money to buy illeagal sexual exploitation .
Judges placing money above the law is a disgrace and itself a
perversion of law and order.
There is no justice in a perverted judge protecting his filthy
predater peers.
Cameron Slater maybe a crude example of a hero though someone has to
stand up against pedofile rings led by New Zealand judges.
Christ's love
Some real words of wisdom in there alright. Pity there in the wrong order.
I just rechecked and found the grammer acceptable .
Christ's love
That's great. Thanks.
What do we and what should the judges consider when they decide
wheather to supress the name of a father who has molestered his under
12 child.
We have to take into account the effect that child is going to have on
her peers and their lives . to do this we need to consider the number
of prostitues and deviants that were molestered at a young age.
When this is factored we can then decide wheather the Judge is using
the secret to lure unkowing innocent peers into the same depravity.
The child is tainted and noone can ever take that away from her.
I pray secrets in the past have brought safe caring marriages.
Christ's love
Where did I go wrong?
Christ's love
Posting.
Which case do you refer Geo? there is two.
Christ's love
Your looking unessarily cranky.
TURN THIS GROUP TO FORMAL AND YOU WILL ATTRACT LIABLE SUITS.
Christ's love
The one who is alleged to have molested the four year old.
The accused former Olympian is already guilty of a serious criminal
offence. The problem is that it's a different offence than the one he's
being tried for and the court has imposed suppression in the interests
of a fair trial.
Personally I think name suppression in this and other cases (such as
Schollum and Skipton) is pretty much a lost cause.
The Comedian's name is being suppressed to avoid identifying the victin
(and Cam Slater hasn't identified them). If news reports are true, he
isn't denying the facts just that he had didn't have the intent to
commit a crime. I doubt that the jury would agree.
--Peter Metcalfe
To right they could plaster his name and picture on every street
corner and a 4 year old wouldn't know what on earth was going on. If
he's put away for ten years they won't be seen together. Only the most
diligent of busy bodies will put two and two together and that could
all be wiped clean if the family uped and moved to another town.
This case is a clear example of speacial favours and treatment . Money
and postion more important than informed justice.
He should have thought about the consequences prior to his actions and
the judge shgould not be protecting his filth and even worse exposing
the public his attitudes in secrecy.
Let him get another job even if he works in an engineering factory
making sprockets.
Only the Jews are going to hold it against him after ten years clean.
But forgiving is different from forgetting and always being a little
weary is not a bad idea.
Christ's love
"would agree" that he had, or that he didn't have?
Google groups? You think that you're posting to Google groups? Ok, getting a
better picture now....
> Unless I missed a link to who were the recent high profile sex
> offenders.
> This is very different from the [police] putting up in supermarkets
> and advertising a big list of sex offenders and where they live.
> How dare a judge convict a sex offender finding him guilty and have
> the audacity to hide his name.
> In other words allowing money to buy illeagal sexual exploitation .
> Judges placing money above the law is a disgrace and itself a
> perversion of law and order.
> There is no justice in a perverted judge protecting his filthy
> predater peers.
> Cameron Slater maybe a crude example of a hero though someone has to
> stand up against pedofile rings led by New Zealand judges.
> Christ's love
From what I know about you CK and from what I saw about a British man
recently executed in China you should be very careful if you're travelling
there. Don't talk to strangers at the airports.
--
Shaun.
"Give a man a fire and he's warm for the day. But set fire to him and he's
warm for the rest of his life." Terry Pratchet, 'Jingo'.
> He deliberately posted hints to the identity of the child rapist comedian to
> bump up numbers to his little blog.
No he hasn't. He has posted hints about other people's identity but not
the Comedian.
> With it being a test case I think he hopes to get off scot free. With
> his father being extremely well connected in the National Party and
> contacts to the other "movers and shakers" it is obvious that he will
> walk away scot free or with a derisory punishment.
Except that one of his previous targets in breaching name suppression
happens to be somebody who is currently bigger than his father in the
National Party, hence I don't see how his National Party contacts can
get him off.
--Peter Metcalfe
I think that the word you're struggling to find in 'libel'. As for
the rest of the piffle, well, words fail me.
kind regards
bill
Not likely if it will identify the victim.
That is what should be considered, not whether it will affect the guilty
person's career etc.
How morbid when you could follow Jesus and live forever.
Become a Nazarite like Jesus.
Nazarite denotes a people from a place because Samson was a Nazarite
from the womb.
So I guess being a Nazarene is from a place where custom is variations
on being a nazarite.
Much like Levites are all preist's .
This is my updated view.
Christ's love
Everyone knows who the former Olympian is who has a previous conviction
for a serious crfiminal offence for which he served jail time.
>
> Personally I think name suppression in this and other cases (such as
> Schollum and Skipton) is pretty much a lost cause.
>
> The Comedian's name is being suppressed to avoid identifying the victin
> (and Cam Slater hasn't identified them). If news reports are true, he
> isn't denying the facts just that he had didn't have the intent to
> commit a crime. I doubt that the jury would agree.
>
> --Peter Metcalfe