As much as I love this idea and am certainly willing to throw any
knowledge your way, this is a tough one.
Let's star with what fiber optics are: Staggeringly expensive because
they are very tiny, very pure rods bundled together with a flexible
sleeve. The flexibility is important because you're bending light
around corners. The end where it meets the light source is then
cleaned and polished in laboratory conditions and housed in a metal
sleeve that is then placed precisely in an illuminator to capture as
much light from the source that is being reflected to a certain point.
1 - Yes
2 - As far as I have seen, somewhat, but not really very. Mostly
because the extruder is sending out a tiny strand of plastic and
building up layers. This is mostly precise, but think of the clarity
of a stack of clear straws bundled together.
3 - Someone may have, but this is also somewhat difficult because of
the precision involved. A Fresnel lens was originally created with
the same focal properties of a traditional curved lens but essentially
has a series of cuts like a ziggurat made in the flat side and is then
squished to make it flatter, thus eliminating the build up of heat
from the source which, at the time, destroyed larger curved lenses.
My point being that you can probably source some less expensive
existing lenses that would work as well but aren't Fresnels. This
will be a lot easier than making your own.
Offhand, where are you trying to get light from and how far are you
looking to send it? Could you consider a periscope-type device with
mirrors instead? Fiber optic's staggeringly purity will make building
it difficult and even with factory-grade stuff you probably end up
losing about 30% of the original source through various ways. But I'm
intrigued and am certainly willing to do what I can, let's talk about
what the problem is though, there may be a better solution than fiber.
Jeff
mcc...@hotmail.com