Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Historical temperature records altered to show recent warming
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Blue'n
Dec 1, 2009, 2:10:21 PM12/1/09
to
On Nov 30, 9:52 pm, "o z n b o" <f...@w.com> wrote:
> "Professional data rigger" <d...@rigger.com> wrote in messagenews:4b14aa7e$0$22916$e4fe...@news.xs4all.nl...
>
> > bw wrote:
> >>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/
>
> > The following petition should in my opinion be mailed to news media:
>
> > "Climate-gate is a fiction invented by the global-warming denier community
> > because ample irrevocable independent scientific evidence still speaks in
> > favor of global warming.
>
> Oh really?
>
> Would You Buy A Used Car From These So-Called "Scientists"?
>
> Our gullible alarmist friends have obviously fallen for this scam hook,
> line, and sinker!
>
> First we had the IPCC report "The Science of Climate Change 1995", where
> lead auther Benjamin D. Santer removed the following conclusions made by
> genuine scientists, and without the scientists being made aware of this
> change.
>
> "None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can
> attribute the observed climate changes to the specific cause of increases in
> greenhouse gases."
>
> "No study to date has positively attributed all or part [of the climate
> change observed to date] to anthropogenic [man-made] causes."
>
> "Any claims of positive detection of significant climate change are likely
> to remain controversial until uncertainties in the total natural variability
> of the climate system are reduced."
>
> Then we have some choice quotes from so-called "consensus scientists".
>
> "The two MMs [Canadian skeptics Steve McIntyre and Ross McKitrick] have been
> after the CRU station data for years. If they ever hear there is a Freedom
> of Information Act now in the UK, I think I'll delete the file rather than
> send to anyone."
>
> Phil Jones email, Feb 2 2005
>
> "I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report, Kevin and
> I will keep them out somehow, even if we have to redefine what the
> peer-review literature is!"
>
> Phil Jones Director, The CRU
>
> [cutting skeptical scientists out of an official UN report]
>
> "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment,
> and it is a travesty that we can't .there should be even more warming... the
> data are surely wrong".
>
> Kevin Trenberth, Climatologist, US Centre for Atmospheric Research
>
> "...If anything, I would like to see the climate change happen, so the
> science could be proved right, regardless of the consequences. This isn't
> being political, it is being selfish. "
>
> Phil Jones Director, The CRU
>
> "We have to get rid of the Medi val Warm Period" Confided to geophysicist
> David Deming by the IPCC, 1995
>
> [Many believe that man to be Jonathan Overpeck, which Prof. Deming didn't
> deny in an email response, who would later also serve as an IPCC lead
> author.]
>
> "We have 25 years or so invested in the work. Why should I make the data
> available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it?"
> Phil Jones Director, The CRU
>
> "We have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements,
> and make little mention of any doubts we might have." Professor Stephen
> Schneider
>
> "Humans need a common motivation ... either a real one or else one invented
> for the purpose. ... In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
> with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages,
> famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by
> human intervention so the real enemy then, is humanity itself." Club of Rome
> declaration
>
> "It doesn't matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is
> true.... You are what the media define you to be. Greenpeace became a myth
> and fund generating machine." Paul Watson, Co-Founder Greenpeace, Forbes,
> Nov. 1991
>
> Now what conclusion would a rational and sceptical person come to?
>
> Frederick Seitz, president emeritus of Rockefeller University and chairman
> of the George C. Marshall Institute, summed it up nicely after seeing the
> changes made to the IPCC report.
>
> "In my more than 60 years as a member of the American scientific community,
> including service as president of both the National Academy of Sciences and
> the American Physical Society, I have never witnessed a more disturbing
> corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC
> report."
>
> Warmest Regards
>
> B0n oz
>
> "It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps
> US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists
> worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct
> from natural variation."
>
> Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
> "Professional data rigger" <d...@rigger.com> wrote in messagenews:4b14aa7e$0$22916$e4fe...@news.xs4all.nl...
>
> > bw wrote:
> >>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/
>
> > The following petition should in my opinion be mailed to news media:
>
> > "Climate-gate is a fiction invented by the global-warming denier community
> > because ample irrevocable independent scientific evidence still speaks in
> > favor of global warming.
>
> Oh really?
>
> Would You Buy A Used Car From These So-Called "Scientists"?
>
> Our gullible alarmist friends have obviously fallen for this scam hook,
> line, and sinker!
>
> First we had the IPCC report "The Science of Climate Change 1995", where
> lead auther Benjamin D. Santer removed the following conclusions made by
> genuine scientists, and without the scientists being made aware of this
> change.
>
> "None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can
> attribute the observed climate changes to the specific cause of increases in
> greenhouse gases."
>
> "No study to date has positively attributed all or part [of the climate
> change observed to date] to anthropogenic [man-made] causes."
>
> "Any claims of positive detection of significant climate change are likely
> to remain controversial until uncertainties in the total natural variability
> of the climate system are reduced."
>
> Then we have some choice quotes from so-called "consensus scientists".
>
> "The two MMs [Canadian skeptics Steve McIntyre and Ross McKitrick] have been
> after the CRU station data for years. If they ever hear there is a Freedom
> of Information Act now in the UK, I think I'll delete the file rather than
> send to anyone."
>
> Phil Jones email, Feb 2 2005
>
> "I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report, Kevin and
> I will keep them out somehow, even if we have to redefine what the
> peer-review literature is!"
>
> Phil Jones Director, The CRU
>
> [cutting skeptical scientists out of an official UN report]
>
> "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment,
> and it is a travesty that we can't .there should be even more warming... the
> data are surely wrong".
>
> Kevin Trenberth, Climatologist, US Centre for Atmospheric Research
>
> "...If anything, I would like to see the climate change happen, so the
> science could be proved right, regardless of the consequences. This isn't
> being political, it is being selfish. "
>
> Phil Jones Director, The CRU
>
> "We have to get rid of the Medi val Warm Period" Confided to geophysicist
> David Deming by the IPCC, 1995
>
> [Many believe that man to be Jonathan Overpeck, which Prof. Deming didn't
> deny in an email response, who would later also serve as an IPCC lead
> author.]
>
> "We have 25 years or so invested in the work. Why should I make the data
> available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it?"
> Phil Jones Director, The CRU
>
> "We have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements,
> and make little mention of any doubts we might have." Professor Stephen
> Schneider
>
> "Humans need a common motivation ... either a real one or else one invented
> for the purpose. ... In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
> with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages,
> famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by
> human intervention so the real enemy then, is humanity itself." Club of Rome
> declaration
>
> "It doesn't matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is
> true.... You are what the media define you to be. Greenpeace became a myth
> and fund generating machine." Paul Watson, Co-Founder Greenpeace, Forbes,
> Nov. 1991
>
> Now what conclusion would a rational and sceptical person come to?
>
> Frederick Seitz, president emeritus of Rockefeller University and chairman
> of the George C. Marshall Institute, summed it up nicely after seeing the
> changes made to the IPCC report.
>
> "In my more than 60 years as a member of the American scientific community,
> including service as president of both the National Academy of Sciences and
> the American Physical Society, I have never witnessed a more disturbing
> corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC
> report."
>
> Warmest Regards
>
> B0n oz
>
> "It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps
> US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists
> worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct
> from natural variation."
>
> Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
Could the Maglev help eliminate rapid global warming? Or could
reforestation efforts be in danger?
http://www.inhabitat.com/2007/11/26/super-powered-magnetic-wind-turbine-maglev/
http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/26/maglev-wind-turbines-1000x-more-effiencient-than-normal-windmill/
0 new messages