I have some confusion & dissonance. I read the proposal as saying "let's
all agree that we don't have to all agree about things". (We want
uniformity of diversity? Conformity to non-conformity? Enslavement to
Also, I'm puzzled about how TGI or CNVC or anyone could embrace both
certification and non-standardization. Any insights?
And I'm concerned that such a statement is a sort of vague wish. Ambiguous
enough that we won't be able to measure how well/badly the wish is being
> Do you imagine that the CNVC adopting such a statement could meet your needs for trust in relating with NVC in ways that are open, free, respectful
and in integrity?
Sounds like a faux need to me (
what I mean? I don't get a sense of what matters to you in trying to deal
with CNVC at all and in particular around getting them to adopt a diversity