You cannot post messages because only members can post, and you are not currently a member.
Description:
Discussion of NUnitLite, a lightweight test framework based on NUnit that will run on .NET, .NET CF and Mono.
|
|
|
Bugs in 0.7
|
| |
For now I am avoiding storing yet another password (for launchpad) and, of all source control systems, Mercurial is the one I never developed a friendly relationship with. Thus I post here: a) "No comments are better than wrong comments department". Example of comments in Program.cs // Debug output works on all platforms.... more »
|
|
NUnitLite 0.7 Released
|
| |
Hi All,
I just released version 0.7 of NUnitLite. This is a bit of a milestone
in several ways:
* Most framework-level features of full NUnit are supported (generic
methods is one big exception due to issues with reflection in the
Compact framework)
* This is the first time binaries are included in the release - builds... more »
|
|
NUnitLite XMLResultWriter TestResult.xml
|
| |
Hi,
is there any possibilty to write TestResult.xml files in NUnitLite?
The roadmap lists it for 0.6.
But 0.6 is already out and there is no possibility to write this xml
files.
Has anybody an solution?
Maybe some not final code, i could use for a start?
|
|
NUnitLite 0.6 Released
|
| |
Hi All, I just released NUnitLite 0.6.0 on Launchpad - [link] This release has a few minor changes and bug fixes, listed below, and is the first release under the MIT/X11 license. The main reason for this release is to clear all work-in-progress out of the queue in order to begin integration of NUnitLite with... more »
|
|
NUnit 2.9.2 Release - Including NUnitLite
|
| |
Hi All, The NUnit 2.9.2 Framework release is now available on Launchpad... [link] This release merges the nunit and nunitlite code bases. The version of NUnitLite built with this release provides a larger subset of the features of the full NUnit framework than any previous NUnitLite... more »
|
|
Distributing NUnitLite
|
| |
Hi All, Sorry for the cross-post, but this clearly affects both groups. NUnitLite is now being built from the same source as NUnit, using conditional compilation. What would suit the communities better: * Separate NUnit framework and NUnitLite downloads? * A single download that has both? Bear in mind that we're talking about the NUnit *framework*... more »
|
|
Working branch for merge of NUnit and NUnitLite
|
| |
Hi All, For those interested, I have a code branch on Launchpad that merges NUnit and NUnitLite. The tests pass for .NET 1.1 and 2.0, NETCF 1.0 and 2.0 and Mono 1.0 and 2.0. The features for NUnitLite are a subset of NUnit but include a number of things not available in the last NUnitLite release, notably... more »
|
|
NUnitLite Features Specified
|
| |
Hi All, I have published a specification at [link] The relevant part for this list is that it describes the planned features for NUnitLite as compared to NUnit itself. Your comments will be helpful in this area. Charlie
|
|
ANN: NUnitLite License Change
|
| |
Hi All, NUnitLite is changing from the Open Software License to the MIT license. This is reflected in the current source on Launchpad and will apply to the next release. I'm doing this to make it consistent with NUnit 3.0, which will also use the MIT license. For downloads and info visit [link].... more »
|
|
|