Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion On callbacks
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Antti Mäkelä  
View profile  
 More options Sep 12 2009, 4:41 am
From: Antti Mäkelä <zar...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Sep 12 2009 4:41 am
Subject: Re: On callbacks
On Sep 12, 2:11 am, <crai...@ee.washington.edu> wrote:

> I don't think there any instance in our codebase of a TracedValue tracing
> anything but POD (uin32_t, int8_t, etc.), so I tend to think about
> TracedValue in terms of tracing POD -- ints, chars, longs, shorts, etc.  You

  Ok, currently I'm using tracecallbacks of type "Bool" and "Time". I
guess bool could work as TracedValue as well, but how about Time?
V4ping application uses TracedCallback<Time> m_traceRtt;

  Actually, I implemented my own "has the state changed" check in the
callback since I didn't truly understand the difference - all I had to
go on with were the examples. So thank you very much for this info.
Maybe this thread could be edited a bit and copypasted to the
documentation? I mean, currently http://www.nsnam.org/docs/manual.html
has "2.3.3, Tracing Subsystem" and NOTHING else.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.