Mathieu
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ns-3-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to ns-3-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> ns-3-users+...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/ns-3-users?hl=en.
>
--
Mathieu Lacage <mathieu...@gmail.com>
(I read your email in this thread: I am not sure what the problem is
but my suspicion is that you are observing some ARP packets getting
lost which is causing a lot of problems down the road. Namely, losing
ARP apckets is something that most research papers do not account for.
They assume perfect ARP tables are always present which can be
simulated in ns-3 if you use a very large ARP cache delay and make
sure everyone sends at least one data packet before starting your data
stream. If this is the problem you are really faced with, I would
suggest looking carefully at what makes this a non-issue in the real
world.In the real world, things are never so perfectly synchronized
which is why pavel/kirill suggested using a processing delay to
randomize things. It has been a while since I did not look at this
kind of issue but I know from first-hand experience that it is not
easy to make sure that all stations do not start synchronized and do
not resynchronize later on data/ack transmissions)
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Lacage <mathieu...@gmail.com>