Received: by 10.224.198.6 with SMTP id em6mr12669666qab.0.1318299582495;
        Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: npm-@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.224.184.209 with SMTP id cl17ls11103277qab.0.gmail; Mon, 10
 Oct 2011 19:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.180.210 with SMTP id bv18mr11833370qab.3.1318299581934;
        Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.180.210 with SMTP id bv18mr11833369qab.3.1318299581922;
        Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <isaacschlue...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com (mail-qy0-f174.google.com [209.85.216.174])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f7si8980663qct.0.2011.10.10.19.19.41
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of isaacschlue...@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.174;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of isaacschlue...@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=isaacschlue...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so3114757qyk.5
        for <npm-@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=krn6sREe4yeuRKfL7Ka2DDeRIuZqbsLP7D5nnZyVUwo=;
        b=gxepulFdXrC3tUW5CWIJOVcJc/UQ5RfRKKvl7b3pzJ3A2kzM3hdBiTBrr40+BGFjHf
         X/W/Ohtg/R+b31xfO0dZDGs7Id3QNkiOW08cKqmIRDG/Fa4iwJdJ2uvpEpOcImyWu5WS
         5WfQ8HeCmqHnH4qfyywU+FTT32HUYuEBIz0Xc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.26.65 with SMTP id d1mr1124531qcc.285.1318299581563; Mon,
 10 Oct 2011 19:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: isaacschlue...@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.97.212 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPPKGeqhTOK=LFJs03Gb5-ME9Sv8Re4LZcUf78_RzPsTE_i...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <aa8857cf-76b6-4fa5-9c83-e2c84dedb...@x25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
	<CAPm8pjp+y9Aqp_a9Yd_Nqs9kgJrECZ-YMGDeYAy12_Uux4U...@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPPKGeqhTOK=LFJs03Gb5-ME9Sv8Re4LZcUf78_RzPsTE_i...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:19:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CADcwD-GiLoKjyWM9s8+27PqM3iY0xpHYsDA+k1GRUUG_0TW...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [npm] multiple mkdirp package installed?
From: Isaac Schlueter <i...@izs.me>
To: npm-@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

That's because express is a symlink, so it won't pick up its
dependencies from the current folder.  They must be installed locally
to express.  `npm ls` isn't as smart about reporting this as it should
be, and there's an open bug on it.

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 18:15, rogerz <rogerz.zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Dean Landolt <d...@deanlandolt.com> wro=
te:
>>
>> Is it really that bad? How much space is each instance of mkdirp eating
>> up? I could see it being a problem on embedded devices, but that's about=
 it.
>
> It is not a problem for a single mkdirp package. I'm just seeking for a m=
ore
> elegant solution for dependency.=C2=A0As the packages accumulate day by d=
ay, this
> might grow into a problem.
> --
> rogerz