Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Jun 02 09:58AM -0600
Akinbo,
Why do you not answer my question. Was your statement made in error. It
seems to make no sense
" To arrive at this claimed special relativistic 7µs per day slowing in
...more
|
|
|
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Jun 02 05:23PM
Cornelis,
Satellite orbital velocity is not zero. I never said it was.
In SR, the 'v' is the velocity at which two clocks *separate*. In GPS, these two clocks are the satellite clock and a
...more
|
|
|
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Jun 02 11:40AM -0600
Akinbo
I do not know from what example you got this information about the rate of
seperation between two clocks but it is not applicable here. The velocity
used by SR is tangential velocity of
...more
|
|
|
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Jun 02 05:51PM
Cornelis,
It is called moving the goalposts.
There was no GPS in Einstein's time and his theory was founded on separation velocity.
Do you have an answer to my own question...
...more
|
|
|
Carl Reiff <cre...@elgenwave.com>: Jun 02 01:04PM -0700
Hi Akinbo,
I would probably like to discuss #1 further, but will forbear for now,
as #2 seems more pressing.
Regarding, "...from the satellite orbiting clock point of view and from
...more
|
|
|
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Jun 02 02:12PM -0600
Akinbo,
I take it by your changing the goal post response that you can not justify
your errant statement and wish to change the subject. I do not wish to
play your game.
" To arrive at this
...more
|
|
|
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Jun 03 11:37AM
Hi Carl,
Re: “No. Two identical clocks would show differing values after the orbit.”
So, as not to misrepresent, I have made effort to draw below diagram to understand this No answer.
...more
|