All,
FYI.
This is relevant to NoSQL and NewSQL graph databases in general.
Read on..
On 4/29/13 7:54 AM, Christian Bizer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Berlin SPARQL Benchmark (BSBM) is a benchmark for measuring the
> performance of storage systems that expose SPARQL endpoints. The
> benchmark is built around an e-commerce use case in which a set of
> products is offered by different vendors.The benchmark defines two
> query mixes:
> 1. The query mix of theExplore use case
> <
http://wifo5-03.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/bizer/berlinsparqlbenchmark/spec/ExploreUseCase/index.html>illustrates
> the search and navigation pattern of a consumer looking for a product
> via some web portal.
> 2. The query mix of theBusiness Intelligence use case
> <
http://wifo5-03.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/bizer/berlinsparqlbenchmark/spec/BusinessIntelligenceUseCase/index.html>simulates
> different stakeholders asking analytical questions against the
> dataset. The query mix relies heavily on SPARQL 1.1 constructs like
> GROUP BY and COUNT() and is designed to touch large portions of the
> benchmark dataset.
>
> I'm happy to announce the results of a new BSBM benchmark experiment.
> The experiment compares the performance of
>
> 1. BigData
> 2. BigOwlim
> 3. Jena TDB
> 4. Virtuoso
>
> on a single machine using datasets ranging from 10 million to 1
> billion RDF triples (Explore and Business Intelligence query mixes).
>
> In addition, it compares the performance of
>
> 1. BigOwlim
> 2. Virtuoso
>
> on a cluster of 8 machines using datasets ranging from 10 billion to
> 150 billion RDF triples (Explore and Business Intelligence query mixes).
>
> The results of the experiment are found at
>
>
http://wifo5-03.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/bizer/berlinsparqlbenchmark/results/V7/
>
>
> I think that the results are quite impressive and demonstrate that
> SPARQL stores got a lot more mature over the last years.
>
> A year ago, many RDF stores still had problems with the SPARQL 1.1
> constructs GROUP BY and COUNT() and were thus not able to execute the
> Business Intelligence query mix. Now, all systems pass this test and
> some of the systems show an impressive performance on grouping and
> aggregating the data.
>
> The 150 billion triples experiment has shown that given proper
> hardware, it is possible to run analytical queries on amounts of data
> that are beyond most (all?) of today's use cases: The whole LOD Cloud
> [1] is estimated to consist only of 31 billion triples; the RDFa,
> Microdata and Microformat dataset extracted by the WebDataCommons [2]
> project from 3 billion HTML pages only consists of 7.3 billion
> triples. So, 150 billion triples leave quite some room for the further
> growth of structured data on the Web ;-)
>
> More information about the Berlin SPARQL benchmark, the exact
> specification of the benchmark query mixes, as well as results from
> previous benchmarking experiments are found at
>
>
http://wifo5-03.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/bizer/berlinsparqlbenchmark/
>
> Lots of thanks to Peter Boncz and Minh-Duc Pham who conducted the new
> experiment as part of the EU project LOD2 and have provided their
> results for being published on the BSBM website.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris
>
> [1]
http://lod-cloud.net/state/
> [2]
http://www.webdatacommons.org/
>
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web:
http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog:
http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile:
https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen