Received: by 10.204.128.207 with SMTP id l15mr1445955bks.4.1341878950228;
        Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: nodejs@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.4.74 with SMTP id 10ls956847bkq.0.gmail; Mon, 09 Jul 2012
 17:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.130.7 with SMTP id q7mr3369249bks.2.1341878938095;
        Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.130.7 with SMTP id q7mr3369248bks.2.1341878938085;
        Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <aaronngray.li...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com (mail-lb0-f171.google.com [209.85.217.171])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k7si16855633bks.2.2012.07.09.17.08.57
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of aaronngray.li...@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.171;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of aaronngray.li...@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=aaronngray.li...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by lbom4 with SMTP id m4so1187444lbo.30
        for <nodejs@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=LpRyjb59Vs8yL97xHDx3YJCNpVjsFYPXvecmU5q2B1c=;
        b=xjuhUxhvc56G3AOos5L67wDf4/FPpTVFET+Fz6zP61Ug95E1LvKM52xNvDj6wmLGU5
         BQiGg1DKfQ9HJXMqGy6sEsq34HHcbJ/hKB5BYdpOEHNU7rKsqoQLIxaNNYJV+P19VOPd
         M8mzTq3QrXq6x3AeXJjJml+EXAQFeu2Uf/qbHt8V+ULDYb/pejH72aned0P964o7zinw
         5mol77sfoKFiSLDcxKFJCQvnMtnokjtZOh1s+RKkt8ra0vAVIfASb3ys3n64Dgy+LV41
         9vRlUqDTJigUai7+W7BwmXaF0tho1XpXBgFq7aJH42iyojqk0rYmnezL49HvUW+ZmIr3
         7btA==
Received: by 10.112.28.137 with SMTP id b9mr18797919lbh.99.1341878937680; Mon,
 09 Jul 2012 17:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.64.141 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 17:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <bee7f2d9-2c33-4a34-95c0-6013d4f5ca2e@googlegroups.com>
References: <4ee0a716-1134-4332-ae52-6bab129c9...@q29g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
 <ccf22968-6c0d-4f08-bbea-0dcaa49fb...@e20g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
 <850A18A7-A4BA-44AD-B7F0-A8C7B75FC...@gmail.com> <220b74b1-ca0b-4605-b2e3-1660b0f008af@googlegroups.com>
 <bee7f2d9-2c33-4a34-95c0-6013d4f5ca2e@googlegroups.com>
From: Aaron Gray <aaronngray.li...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:08:37 +0100
Message-ID: <CANkmNDdmmVrd+EAYrv530NJWLRYnT=2B1NXUmE0MfZvZmmb...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [nodejs] MS Windows API bindings
To: nodejs@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 10 July 2012 00:38, Brandon Benvie <brandon.ben...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And example smaller scale implementation of the functions can be seen here,
> for bindings to the registry API:
> https://github.com/Benvie/node-Windows/blob/ffi-registry/lib/bindings-registry.js

Wow, nice !

Thanks,

Aaron