Received: by 10.52.174.114 with SMTP id br18mr7854203vdc.2.1324510530783;
        Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:35:30 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: nodejs@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.52.173.234 with SMTP id bn10ls12566849vdc.3.gmail; Wed, 21 Dec
 2011 15:35:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.92.234 with SMTP id cp10mr1484521vdb.6.1324510523610;
        Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:35:23 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:35:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Tristan <tristan.slomin...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: nodejs@googlegroups.com
To: nodejs@googlegroups.com
Message-ID: <29273239.136.1324510523306.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqbo42>
In-Reply-To: <CAHQurc-TU8Cu+kixVUAgqYLTJQ3ocAsfBq7JprAAgA1OtL4QSw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <11039007.361.1324508025015.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqir6>
 <CAHQurc-TU8Cu+kixVUAgqYLTJQ3ocAsfBq7JprAAgA1OtL4QSw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [nodejs] process.nextTick performance question
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_134_4134764.1324510523305"

------=_Part_134_4134764.1324510523305
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_135_1764877.1324510523305"

------=_Part_135_1764877.1324510523305
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Wow! #1 was a huge difference.

I thought I took care of closures by generating them both in the loop and 
process.nextTick, but removing them per your response made a significant 
difference. This is much more along the lines of what I expected. 

Results using benchmark without closures:
loop result: 22ms
nextTick result: 178ms

Benchmark without closures : https://gist.github.com/1508208

Thanks Ben, that's a much more encouraging result.

------=_Part_135_1764877.1324510523305
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Wow! #1 was a huge difference.<div><br></div><div>I thought I took care of closures by generating them both in the loop and process.nextTick, but removing them per your response made a significant difference. This is much more along the lines of what I expected.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Results using benchmark without closures:</div><div><div>loop result: 22ms</div><div>nextTick result: 178ms</div></div><div><br></div><div>Benchmark without closures :&nbsp;https://gist.github.com/1508208</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks Ben, that's a much more encouraging result.</div>
------=_Part_135_1764877.1324510523305--

------=_Part_134_4134764.1324510523305--