Received: by 10.43.105.135 with SMTP id dq7mr5833240icc.3.1350288715248;
        Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: nodejs@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.50.194.196 with SMTP id hy4ls5768114igc.0.canary; Mon, 15 Oct
 2012 01:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.182.132 with SMTP id ee4mr5303122igc.5.1350288704752;
        Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.182.132 with SMTP id ee4mr5303121igc.5.1350288704740;
        Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <chi...@appsattic.com>
Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com (mail-ob0-f176.google.com [209.85.214.176])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dx8si800932igc.1.2012.10.15.01.11.44
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of chi...@appsattic.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.176;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of chi...@appsattic.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=chi...@appsattic.com
Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id x4so6043986obh.21
        for <nodejs@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=SPv/m4EkltxJq3oq4q3FJHSAQMLVY1Kcg0QY7Eu3/ME=;
        b=MGulTaJWgB1MlzvWk5aVqBir7lY10jFKR8NwAJP4T1nG34RKd4HXNOIhcAmVs6zqg5
         NukZ5w0dUT5UFm02N/4iumnL97Q5Pg1CHB1obBVJH+M/UrEXM63UOmJJkDBBGjNfFp5q
         r3OffBqFn/MQM8XajsefFLCk8X/EFmIl5P/mwkPKQtAlNwhzJumNTBYu8bkyX8gCZZF6
         2M5RRDlaMTDNY1RH7Qz0Dlm8+aKZ+Yuc9s/uUVDXursJlQaF/CR7q48if7Tpl1K4ehmI
         /BgQY1KaeOKTbYKC3QFqA932rd9T+E8aVaeuLKEgrRmb2JIr6E3pRAGgNnT1w729LPI0
         m1Dg==
Received: by 10.182.212.70 with SMTP id ni6mr9056027obc.44.1350288704446; Mon,
 15 Oct 2012 01:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.85.99 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+6xbK0qkJ=n0jMg4QdRPj6+6=Va-G_1wC5g3P8WZQ_epwM...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b6e49bdf-372f-4f53-aa16-756f4bc19e8e@googlegroups.com> <CA+6xbK0qkJ=n0jMg4QdRPj6+6=Va-G_1wC5g3P8WZQ_epwM...@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Chilton <chi...@appsattic.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:11:24 +1300
Message-ID: <CAAGLGUCW2PHtia68BSX9vLcgAJQD6tZwuB2n1LkNOKDh=ku...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [nodejs] Best AWS lib?
To: nodejs@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkUY3gRnusZaDX+3TagoR59ASSxEhr34lCGgP2D9atG2WZ6SNDXoevMNv4fNTgCSSCAVLHL

Hi Andrew,

On 15 October 2012 12:38, Andrew Stone <andrew.j.ston...@gmail.com> wrote:
> node-awssum works really well. It is a giant monolithic library, but I've
> used it successfully just with the AWS parts. Those are the oldest/most
> reliable and Andrew Chilton is very responsive and actively maintains that
> library.

It's not really monolithic (see my previous post) but it is big
because Amazon have 25 or so services! AwsSum now has 100% coverage of
all of these services, though there are a few recent additions I need
to add in. Other packages like aws-lib have just implemented the
services that use Signature v2 whereas AwsSum can do Signature
versions v2, v3, v4 and use STS tokens which covers all services.

Thanks for your kind comment about being responsive however there are
a few issues I need to go and fix! :)

In other news AwsSum celebrated it's first commit a year ago
yesterday. It's been a good year so far, here's to the next (OpenStack
is next on the list). :)

Cheers,
Andy

-- 
Andrew Chilton
e: chi...@appsattic.com
w: http://appsattic.com/
t: https://twitter.com/andychilton
p: +64 21 891 681