Received: by 10.68.31.165 with SMTP id b5mr15516456pbi.1.1323034350026;
        Sun, 04 Dec 2011 13:32:30 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: nodejs@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.74.199 with SMTP id w7ls21513600pbv.7.gmail; Sun, 04 Dec
 2011 13:32:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.15.105 with SMTP id w9mr19318820pbc.7.1323034342513;
        Sun, 04 Dec 2011 13:32:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.15.105 with SMTP id w9mr19318819pbc.7.1323034342506;
        Sun, 04 Dec 2011 13:32:22 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <chi...@appsattic.com>
Received: from mail-pz0-f43.google.com (mail-pz0-f43.google.com [209.85.210.43])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j5si10621415pbi.0.2011.12.04.13.32.22
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 04 Dec 2011 13:32:22 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of chi...@appsattic.com designates 209.85.210.43 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.43;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of chi...@appsattic.com designates 209.85.210.43 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=chi...@appsattic.com
Received: by mail-pz0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z13so4540623dad.2
        for <nodejs@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 13:32:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.39.37 with SMTP id m5mr917582pbk.54.1323034341250; Sun, 04
 Dec 2011 13:32:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.193.13 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 13:32:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAF1vpkgDphphOQ_k-x8byX1ScxvoqERCmSFnXo0PvgjZyQ44rQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c422c60-5b77-438d-b5f3-f4dea4c4abea@e2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <CAAPeUNnFp+J7XWdS_TXmRb85kro6_B5eQ9T4totajOwhW5i=dQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <7bad41da-48cc-4e41-937a-efb28cb5daa0@o1g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
 <CAAPeUNmEAdjUSiYQDCJ-5JbgKyksXLBDKVgetRi+QiWh4Xjy-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF1vpki0DiYHGD=gC9JoPbHtruDJYsAHh4KHorcsKR=eWzcrxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAPeUNkqfiHhQiWP+Z1ovjkR2iYedh7mQFL4pvqyA7p6gJU2Zg@mail.gmail.com>
 <99195f17-0bb3-42d5-8aa2-3037db1b4961@p9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <CAAPeUNm5MnmdEVAm=f5ya=QwE3LnjmQNn1GQQWRRb22HEz1JhQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF1vpkgDphphOQ_k-x8byX1ScxvoqERCmSFnXo0PvgjZyQ4...@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Chilton <chi...@appsattic.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 10:32:00 +1300
Message-ID: <CAAGLGUDEOZoHD8+=xGvW_McXHC_ziWaQnn8kisss_rLY9s=...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [nodejs] Re: What do people do for versionizing node modules
 within git?
To: nodejs@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 5 December 2011 10:29, Avi Deitcher <a...@deitcher.net> wrote:
> Now I *really* am confused. You said you add node_modules to .gitignore, but
> you put all of your modules under vendor anyways, and that is under git
> control?

He puts the npm installable modules into node_modules. He puts the
non-npm installable modules into vendor.

node_modules is _not_ checked into Git. Vendor is. :)

Does that make sense?

Cheers,
Andy

-- 
Andrew Chilton
e: chi...@appsattic.com
w: http://www.appsattic.com/
p: +64 21 891 681