Unbelievable Request...

[hasanyasin]

Hey everybody,

I would brazenly like to ask your up-votes for my answer about a question on Node and threading. I know I might sound unbelievably inappropriate by nosing the group with this; but I have spent an hour of my time to explain why Node is good and how it works and I did this to help Node be understood better. If a few people here just up-votes it, I hope it reaches more people and it can be a tiny addition for the project's public image.

Here is the answer I have submitted:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10773564/which-would-be-better-for-concurrent-tasks-on-node-js-fibers-web-workers-or-t/11278689#11278689

I am writing an article which will be the first in a series. I see many people seeing Node as something cool without understanding the main thing. I will disturb you again when my first article is public. In the meantime, do you suggest anywhere online for an article series on Node instead of opening a website for this myself?

[hasanyasin]

typo: nosing --> noising.

[neojp]

howtonode.org

[hasanyasin]

Thank you very much. howtonode is a blog so it is kind of different than what I am doing. I will probably do it on a separate website designed for this.

Thank you very much for the suggestion.

On Sunday, July 1, 2012 12:44:01 AM UTC-4, neojp wrote:

howtonode.org

[Tim Caswell]

http://nodemanual.org/, http://docs.nodejitsu.com/, http://nodetuts.com/

--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to nod...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nodejs+un...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

[hasanyasin]

@Tim: Thank you very much. For my book, I have already started working on a website special to the book itself. I also plan writing on other sites for short tutorials and how-to articles mostly based around the ideas shaped by questions I see here and there. Thank you very much for these three websites.

@Justin: You are right, I had kept it too long. I wanted to repeat things and tried to cover it (it being repetitions) up with other elements like a given computer; but I had really kept it too long. This was just an answer, I wrote and send and did not work on a lot. I want to assure you that my articles and book will be more tasty to read. I thank you for useful criticism and voting up it on stackoverflow.



On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 2:22:55 PM UTC-4, Justin Collum wrote:

Done. I'd minimize the chattiness of the conversation though. Things like: 

-- I have divided the work into pieces and every process will work on one of these pieces in parallel.

-- Why don't you create threads?

-- Sorry, I don't think it is usable. You can take your computer if you want?

-- No okay, I am cool, I just don't understand why you don't use threads?

aren't helping it, there's a lot to read there and not much of it is contributing.  

[hasanyasin]

On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 5:34:51 PM UTC-4, hasanyasin wrote:

@Tim: Thank you very much. For my book, I have already started working on a website special to the book itself. I also plan writing on other sites for short tutorials and how-to articles mostly based around the ideas shaped by questions I see here and there. Thank you very much for these three websites.

@Justin: You are right, I had kept it too long. I wanted to repeat things and tried to cover it (it being repetitions) up with other elements like a given computer; but I had really kept it too long. This was just an answer, I wrote and send and did not work on a lot. I want to assure you that my articles and book will be more tasty to read. I thank you for useful criticism and voting up it on stackoverflow.

Ouch! Typos:

wrote and send --> wrote and sent
more tasty --> tastier