Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
nodejs
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion Unbelievable Request...
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
hasanyasin  
View profile  
 More options Jul 3 2012, 5:34 pm
From: hasanyasin <hasanya...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 14:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jul 3 2012 5:34 pm
Subject: Re: Unbelievable Request...
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

@Tim: Thank you very much. For my book, I have already started working on a
website special to the book itself. I also plan writing on other sites for
short tutorials and how-to articles mostly based around the ideas shaped by
questions I see here and there. Thank you very much for these three
websites.

@Justin: You are right, I had kept it too long. I wanted to repeat things
and tried to cover it (*it* being repetitions) up with other elements like
a given computer; but I had really kept it too long. This was just an
answer, I wrote and send and did not work on a lot. I want to assure you
that my articles and book will be more tasty to read. I thank you for
useful criticism and voting up it on stackoverflow.

On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 2:22:55 PM UTC-4, Justin Collum wrote:

> Done. I'd minimize the chattiness of the conversation though. Things like:

> -- I have divided the work into pieces and every process will work on one
> of these pieces in parallel.

> -- Why don't you create threads?

> -- Sorry, I don't think it is usable. You can take your computer if you
> want?
> -- No okay, I am cool, I just don't understand why you don't use threads?

> aren't helping it, there's a lot to read there and not much of it is
> contributing.  

> On Saturday, June 30, 2012 6:13:11 PM UTC-7, hasanyasin wrote:

>> Hey everybody,

>> I would brazenly like to ask your up-votes for my answer about a question
>> on Node and threading. I know I might sound unbelievably inappropriate by
>> nosing the group with this; but I have spent an hour of my time to explain
>> why Node is good and how it works and I did this to help Node be understood
>> better. If a few people here just up-votes it, I hope it reaches more
>> people and it can be a tiny addition for the project's public image.

>> Here is the answer I have submitted:

>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10773564/which-would-be-better-for...

>> I am writing an article which will be the first in a series. I see many
>> people seeing Node as something cool without understanding the main thing.
>> I will disturb you again when my first article is public. In the meantime,
>> do you suggest anywhere online for an article series on Node instead of
>> opening a website for this myself?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google