Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: rektide <rekt...@voodoowarez.com>
To: nodejs@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <3037a5d0-084f-47a6-8216-454a1320bae6@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHfnhfrnqVfH6D8QijEp_z=PKbMrJDnbjmXj9OfBdhsPXshS5Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3BDDA090-823C-4386-A083-6DAEA39A4593@jorgechamorro.com>
 <8f86081c-dc00-4c4b-8678-ec9d70fe0e3e@googlegroups.com> <CADcwD-ETR1gvKkSY1e35aCgPS+FVns-=u760D+Yn0xoifPB1_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHfnhfqpghHoBkNJ32kk+eEVkrGPALoMOYOn=fbNY6Pw10Q4Uw@mail.gmail.com>
 <d7a1221d-1074-4757-88f1-c15b8b9a0fa1@googlegroups.com> <CADcwD-ECMebssXtXXJNj9zz9MO++RxMW310Lk5iPAdVXCTpEJQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHfnhfrnqVfH6D8QijEp_z=PKbMrJDnbjmXj9OfBdhsPXshS5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [nodejs] Re: Crockford : Ynode : "I would fork node.js"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_201_20807732.1348089836988"

------=_Part_201_20807732.1348089836988
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_202_11261582.1348089836988"

------=_Part_202_11261582.1348089836988
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



> I wasn't really addressing you=E2=80=94your comments were entirely reason=
able. I=20
> was addressing the shit-talking dog-pile.
>

I challenge you to find anything in this thread that directly shit-talks=20
Node or Joyent. I *want* to believe this is fair and balanced discussion.=
=20
Jorge got a little tweaked at one point, but still refrained from shit=20
talking either.
=20

> ps. In case it wasn't clear, the only part that I agree with is "threads=
=20
> have no place in JavaScript or Node".
>

Who is shit talking now? Why hate Rick?

There's a whole lot of over-reactionary fear to a topic some people don't=
=20
like: as Isaac once insisted, "lighten up people"

------=_Part_202_11261582.1348089836988
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex=
;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"=
><div>I wasn't really addressing you=E2=80=94your comments were entirely re=
asonable. I was addressing the shit-talking dog-pile.</div></div></blockquo=
te><div><br></div><div>I challenge you to find anything in this thread that=
 directly shit-talks Node or Joyent. I *want* to believe this is fair and b=
alanced discussion. Jorge got a little tweaked at one point, but still refr=
ained from shit talking either.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><blockquote class=3D"=
gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc so=
lid;padding-left: 1ex;"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div>ps.&nbsp;<span styl=
e=3D"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">In case it wasn't clear, the o=
nly part that I agree with is "</span><span style=3D"font-family:arial,helv=
etica,sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">threads =
have no place in JavaScript or Node".</span></div></div></blockquote><div><=
br></div><div>Who is shit talking now? Why hate Rick?<br><br>There's a whol=
e lot of over-reactionary fear to a topic some people don't like: as Isaac =
once insisted, "lighten up people"</div>
------=_Part_202_11261582.1348089836988--

------=_Part_201_20807732.1348089836988--