Received: by 10.59.5.193 with SMTP id co1mr5690719ved.37.1351066448190; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 01:14:08 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: nodejs@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.156.210 with SMTP id y18ls1590517vcw.2.gmail; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 01:13:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.93.132 with SMTP id cu4mr2660525vdb.14.1351066438819; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 01:13:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 01:13:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Karl To: nodejs@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <35dbd845-3188-4278-985b-b11afcc2c9d1@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References:

<826d8933-c73b-4b96-980c-2ff10e2af479@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [nodejs] Re: Use of Node / Express / MongoDB for a e-commerce website? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_197_9398195.1351066438431" ------=_Part_197_9398195.1351066438431 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_198_14757791.1351066438431" ------=_Part_198_14757791.1351066438431 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Trust is a big asset, I saw a recent study somewhere that webshoppers seem= =20 to be considerably more loyal than one assumes. More reason not to take=20 chances. Risk taking was what got us into the current complex situation=20 (I'm in Spain) El mi=C3=A9rcoles, 24 de octubre de 2012 09:51:23 UTC+2, Adam Reynolds escr= ibi=C3=B3: > > This. This beyond anything else. You would have a major problem with=20 > customer trust.=20 > > On a side note you can google mongodb transactions and see the=20 > hassle/failure people have had trying to make transactional processes wor= k=20 > within Mongodb. It really is the wrong tool for the job at the (moment). > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Eric S > > wrote: > >> >> The last factor, and probably the most important one in my opinion, is= =20 >> lost reputation. If you bought something online, never received anythin= g,=20 >> and when you contacted the seller, they said that they had no record of= =20 >> your order other than the CC charge, would you EVER use them again, even= if=20 >> they promptly refunded your money? >> > ------=_Part_198_14757791.1351066438431 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Trust is a big asset, I saw a recent study somewhere that webshoppers seem = to be considerably more loyal than one assumes. More reason not to take cha= nces. Risk taking was what got us into the current complex situation (I'm i= n Spain)

El mi=C3=A9rcoles, 24 de octubre de 2012 09:51:23 UTC+2, Ad= am Reynolds escribi=C3=B3:

Thi= s. This beyond anything else. You would have a major problem with customer = trust.

On a side note you can google mongodb trans= actions and see the hassle/failure people have had trying to make transacti= onal processes work within Mongodb. It really is the wrong tool for the job= at the (moment).

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Eric S <er...@geekzilla.org> wrote:

The last factor, and probably the most important one in= my opinion, is lost reputation. If you bought something online, neve= r received anything, and when you contacted the seller, they said that they= had no record of your order other than the CC charge, would you EVER use t= hem again, even if they promptly refunded your money?

------=_Part_198_14757791.1351066438431-- ------=_Part_197_9398195.1351066438431--