Message from discussion
Node.jar - Java port by Oracle
Received: by 10.66.81.202 with SMTP id c10mr4482387pay.40.1349742089173;
Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: nodejs@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.189.162 with SMTP id gj2ls24322767pbc.6.gmail; Mon, 08 Oct
2012 17:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.74.102 with SMTP id s6mr4280188pav.21.1349742079853;
Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.74.102 with SMTP id s6mr4280187pav.21.1349742079841;
Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <lordma...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com (mail-pa0-f42.google.com [209.85.220.42])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id js4si4755419pbb.2.2012.10.08.17.21.19
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lordma...@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.42;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lordma...@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lordma...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id fa1so3785327pad.15
for <nodejs@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=lPoS/UZxdZNIYxhzdgVfx15/u0bkfIgMKgy7if13vVc=;
b=V7yHoNFieL9sck21c5oW/d3zfP5RdZDfu1RMgjTsYskevDpMzB7FhtAuTjGAEg03mJ
Oa5JJo3a8W/ftVaIlM8tAk8HMkhz9ieFhXejlgNbhyHcU9+CWL4IbjlNa17Nr0f1ajLp
NGPtGkCIi9/D23c0aN4qP4O/9yV54GEMQEh95Yw+7pMBi5SAR3Ky7NsESP1DbS1b0Wzh
AaXbAFnw4rDIfWPjGEYoJwymG3MqAZR/as0Iu2cCPJwjQyGwglVHID3mG8lGpnSwOu/y
6svvBSu1NOY+VJsqrZcZ4Ss/BNzDUn2xD7YDxzgRoXY57ZKL9rQta28UXG6nMPweYpPQ
HflQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.73.230 with SMTP id o6mr47569134pav.45.1349742079735; Mon,
08 Oct 2012 17:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.58.65 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 17:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+CQ937g5ec9rq8qSW9EtEYxOAW+O9uSkLMqqLy-=5f_EKw...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0e0f7074-76dc-4b4c-ac5f-8612b12eb832@googlegroups.com>
<50734F44.10...@gmail.com>
<CA+CQ937g5ec9rq8qSW9EtEYxOAW+O9uSkLMqqLy-=5f_EKw...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 20:21:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+CQ934eVGXwox3Pm8zn96oypLbZgrz1O3W8j++xEHNu7UQ...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [nodejs] Node.jar - Java port by Oracle
From: Stewart Mckinney <lordma...@gmail.com>
To: nodejs@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d042ef5253376e304cb955172
--f46d042ef5253376e304cb955172
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
*natively. Christ.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Stewart Mckinney <lordma...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I'm just curious as to why having Node run on top of the Java run time is
> better than say, vanilla C++ compiled Node running naively. Doesn't it run
> on pretty much every popular platform now, anyway?
>
> If you are going to build out new services in Node.js, why not simply
> create auxiliary architecture to support it? Service layers don't need to
> be physically integrated, although I can see the argument from an
> "gee this is gonna be easier to convince my IT department to do"
> perspective.
>
> To me it just seems like an interesting exercise, not anything truly
> practical, although I don't mind being educated in the matter.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Patrick Mueller <pmue...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/4/12 1:16 PM, Jonathan Buchanan wrote:
>>
>>> I'm at JavaOne, for my sins, and I've been attending all the sessions
>>> related to Oracle's new JavaScript implementation in Java, called Nashorn.
>>>
>>> What initially caught my eye was that they're also porting the Node.js
>>> APIs, module system etc. in a project called Node.jar.
>>>
>> For folks interested in "node on Java", there's a project out there
>> called SprintStack which - as near as I can tell - also aims to provide
>> "node" on Java.
>>
>> http://sprintstack.com/
>>
>> I have no experience with it, just happened to notice it a while back.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
>> Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/**node/wiki/Mailing-List-**
>> Posting-Guidelines<https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "nodejs" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> nodejs+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com<nodejs%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/**group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en>
>>
>
>
--f46d042ef5253376e304cb955172
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
*natively. Christ.<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at=
8:21 PM, Stewart Mckinney <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:lordmapl=
e...@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">lordma...@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br=
><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1=
px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I'm just curious as to why having Node run on top of the Java=A0run tim=
e=A0is better than say, vanilla C++ compiled Node running=A0naively. Doesn&=
#39;t it run on pretty much every popular platform now, anyway?<div><br></d=
iv>
<div>If you are going to build out new services in Node.js, why not simply =
create=A0auxiliary=A0architecture to support it? Service layers don't n=
eed to be physically integrated, although I can see the argument from an</d=
iv>
<div>"gee this is gonna be easier to convince my IT department to do&q=
uot; perspective.</div><div><br></div><div>To me it just seems like an inte=
resting=A0exercise, not anything truly practical, although I don't mind=
being educated in the matter.<div>
<div class=3D"h5"><br>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Patrick Muel=
ler <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:pmue...@gmail.com" target=3D"_b=
lank">pmue...@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail=
_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:=
1ex">
<div>On 10/4/12 1:16 PM, Jonathan Buchanan wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I'm at JavaOne, for my sins, and I've been attending all the sessio=
ns related to Oracle's new JavaScript implementation in Java, called Na=
shorn.<br>
<br>
What initially caught my eye was that they're also porting the Node.js =
APIs, module system etc. in a project called Node.jar.<br>
</blockquote></div>
For folks interested in "node on Java", there's a project out=
there called SprintStack which - as near as I can tell - also aims to prov=
ide "node" on Java.<br>
<br>
=A0 =A0 <a href=3D"http://sprintstack.com/" target=3D"_blank">http://sprint=
stack.com/</a><br>
<br>
I have no experience with it, just happened to notice it a while back.<div>=
<div><br>
<br>
-- <br>
Job Board: <a href=3D"http://jobs.nodejs.org/" target=3D"_blank">http://job=
s.nodejs.org/</a><br>
Posting guidelines: <a href=3D"https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-=
List-Posting-Guidelines" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/joyent/<u></u=
>node/wiki/Mailing-List-<u></u>Posting-Guidelines</a><br>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google<br>
Groups "nodejs" group.<br>
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:nodejs@googlegroups.=
com" target=3D"_blank">nodejs@googlegroups.com</a><br>
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:nodejs%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com" target=3D"_blank">=
nodejs+unsubscribe@<u></u>googlegroups.com</a><br>
For more options, visit this group at<br>
<a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=3Den?hl=3Den" target=3D=
"_blank">http://groups.google.com/<u></u>group/nodejs?hl=3Den?hl=3Den</a><b=
r>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br>
--f46d042ef5253376e304cb955172--