Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
On 2010-03-15 13:47, Tim Caswell wrote:
> A normal for..in on the object if sufficient, we control thePeople may want to use this on objects that have custom
> code so there is no need for the hasOwnProperty check.
prototype objects (i.e. objects that are instances of at least
one constructor other than Object), so the hasOwnProperty test
is a good idea if you're not trying to copy properties of a
user-created prototype object.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.