--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to nod...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nodejs+un...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
We use mongoose and mongoskin for testing. It really depends on your scenario. In general though mongoose is a good choice.
On 08/07/2012 01:48 AM, Martin Wawrusch wrote:it is if you want to specify schema or use ORM - otherwise mongo-node-native is the defacto node mongo driver and works pretty well - it requires you to write a lot of callbacks, but that's life in the async world.We use mongoose and mongoskin for testing. It really depends on your scenario. In general though mongoose is a good choice.
Yeah. There's so many node-mongodb-native wrappers that add some nice
promise/future-based sugar:
https://github.com/kissjs/node-mongoskin
https://github.com/gett/mongojs
https://github.com/LearnBoost/monk
https://github.com/alexeypetrushin/mongo-lite
Anyone see any particular advantages of using one of these over the
others?
On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 6:13:48 PM UTC-4, Angelo Chen wrote:
this is good, between mongoskin and mongo-lite, difficult to decide.
On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 5:55:46 PM UTC+8, Alexey Petrushin wrote:
MongoDB Driver with simple and compact AP I, it also eliminates
some callbacks http://alexeypetrushin.github.com/mongo-lite
<http://alexeypetrushin.github.com/mongo-lite>