Received: by 10.58.145.65 with SMTP id ss1mr2482413veb.39.1349452824566;
        Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: nodejs@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.210.197 with SMTP id gl5ls357463vcb.0.gmail; Fri, 05 Oct
 2012 09:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.117.41 with SMTP id kb9mr2526658veb.27.1349452814705;
        Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.117.41 with SMTP id kb9mr2526657veb.27.1349452814694;
        Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <danfu...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-vc0-f177.google.com (mail-vc0-f177.google.com [209.85.220.177])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r14si619207vdu.1.2012.10.05.09.00.14
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of danfu...@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.177 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.177;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of danfu...@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.177 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=danfu...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id p16so2276428vcq.36
        for <nodejs@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=jEcx4GCsVXj3omBx4cgK+WB0KQGAfFG0jXTegzCeUaY=;
        b=QmAjp/oytf8FqiJDvFW3pwPgEV6YOR5ACIE8++BzAkNtqDoqTgf462lCSy19x2cCDb
         +4ydCTZ8TFFRYcYIZk64SJCR6++87cGUg58AFlfi5xCt2JxCbEp4+dVptCJkbdwUpwji
         YLgrSs2ZyFPwxlcDq1fXW/H2SADgp85UbuhjMYnuDfq8rnb1PdObRmWYb31RmmS5xmZi
         AfNdmMpMA0pzk24TMhgLE4UeeMECPN3k8RSyXz8syrRh6Nvfp4jXRELiPOmQiNipcy6E
         GXRYEC/I2DTwd6vl4OWapLwNPhyWuc11gXOPV7zVaFF/FGXfW1ibVye0B2so2AIaOArE
         f4VA==
Received: by 10.220.154.6 with SMTP id m6mr5337922vcw.51.1349452814323; Fri,
 05 Oct 2012 09:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: danfu...@gmail.com
Received: by 10.58.132.177 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 08:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADNgbTEdXwgHDrn=wjOXnky1OeyiLWuLbRFgobOKxfN4TDV...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0e0f7074-76dc-4b4c-ac5f-8612b12eb832@googlegroups.com>
 <CAHQurc8wXuTdESBbZri0knY=aPyz5mo7ABRpXJFmkW2z6wF...@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALV00nA+yhSwniD9XBHoPHFSASeSBaVMNh_RGymKCxGvgr=...@mail.gmail.com>
 <F147416084E44712A2A623154E793...@gmail.com> <CADNgbTEdXwgHDrn=wjOXnky1OeyiLWuLbRFgobOKxfN4TDV...@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dan Bornstein <danf...@milk.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 08:59:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAE1-sY3YXf49uVoEgR570PZ2FsG76rs-n35VzgYiK3jG1aN...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [nodejs] Node.jar - Java port by Oracle
To: nodejs@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Karl Tiedt <kti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oracle decided to try and fight Googles use of [Dalvik] on Android...
> and because it was a sudden change in the stance that Sun took on the
> whole situation, the judge basically laughed it off. I would suspect
> something similar would happen with JavaScript.

I hesitate to say this, lest I sound like an actual expert (and also
because it's very nearly off-topic), but I don't think what you say
here really captures how it all went down. If (any of) you want to dig
into details, Groklaw's <http://www.groklaw.net/> coverage of the case
is both extensive and (in my opinion) objective.

Cheers,

-dan