On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 8:55:00 PM UTC-4, Isaac Schlueter wrote:You are projecting defensively: I never requested this feature. I have no
> > No, Isaac. I feel pissed on here. Ack that.
> Your original request for threads-in-node has been met with
expectations for it.
> There'sI'd love an explanation fulfilling my February request: what factors lead
> nothing else to discuss here.
to it being deemed Isolates was adding too much internal complexity?
We have had some discussion, but as to the effort that got the furthest,
cause[d] too much instability in node's internal functionality
And your guidance to go figure out what that means for myself:
You should treat this as an experiment: your goal could be to figure out
> why several people close to the Node project are so against a threading API,Guess? Repeat the experiment and guess? That's a productive use of my time,
becoming as good as Node devs at Node? You thought writing that would be a
productive suggestion for a mailing list? I'm all for leadership by
anarchy, but certainly there's no reason we ought NOT talk, why finding
concordance with another or learning from another is a BAD thing?
I don't demand my 'intellectual curiosity' be satisfied, I'm fine with "I'm
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.