Received: by 10.115.116.40 with SMTP id t40mr1259811wam.5.1270489090211;
        Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.115.116.40 with SMTP id t40mr1259806wam.5.1270489089437;
        Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <t...@creationix.com>
Received: from mail-pz0-f178.google.com (mail-pz0-f178.google.com [209.85.222.178])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 18si2685150pzk.10.2010.04.05.10.38.09;
        Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.222.178 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of t...@creationix.com) client-ip=209.85.222.178;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.222.178 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of t...@creationix.com) smtp.mail=...@creationix.com
Received: by pzk8 with SMTP id 8so201505pzk.16
        for <nodejs@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.209.6 with SMTP id h6mr1792140wfg.11.1270489089000;
        Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <t...@creationix.com>
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (cpe-76-184-251-54.tx.res.rr.com [76.184.251.54])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm3360904ywh.45.2010.04.05.10.38.07
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Subject: Re: [nodejs] Re: Consider MooTools (was: Re: process.mixin)
From: Tim Caswell <t...@creationix.com>
In-Reply-To: <w2s64a10fff1004051030g2f226f9dg27454b50ee9a80d0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:38:06 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E8DBEB29-1961-4E82-BA62-68CAE900F181@creationix.com>
References: <aaedcef51003081516wd5a2ccdn54e4c12ee43651b9@mail.gmail.com> <4B9E44FD.9060606@bloggen.dk> <6ea556b21003161606k53e869f3hcbfd9a5d54df0839@mail.gmail.com> <b0ab5fe6-310e-4f5a-9b51-89431760942c@z11g2000yqz.googlegroups.com> <2e810015-9def-4f10-8401-d1d12aa0a7cf@q23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <l2i4afdeba91004030250y7a4a9f4di9516210a2b6b5...@mail.gmail.com> <84841a63-4d14-4e9b-9067-608fe7b00...@n3g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> <714670D2-61DD-4765-AF91-F48221EE8...@creationix.com> <w2s64a10fff1004051030g2f226f9dg27454b50ee9a8...@mail.gmail.com>
To: nodejs@googlegroups.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)

Of course, since I work on HEAD mostly, it's already gone to me.  I =
thought this thread was discussing what should go in the third-party =
replacement for it.

On Apr 5, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Dean Landolt wrote:

>=20
> Isn't process.mixin slated to go away? This is the kind of thing folks =
will certainly have various opinions about -- since it can all be done =
in pure js shouldn't it go the route of promises?
>=20
> --=20
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google =
Groups "nodejs" group.
> To post to this group, send email to nodejs@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to =
nodejs+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at =
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=3Den.