Renaming posix to fs

[alx]

Followed the latest commits on the node github repository and
wondering why this change was made?

cheers
alx

[Gabriel Farrell]

I'm guessing it's due to movements in that direction in CommonJS.
http://wiki.commonjs.org/wiki/CommonJS

Ryan, looks like the fs.js file didn't make it into that commit.

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group.
> To post to this group, send email to nod...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nodejs+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en.
>
>

[Ryan Dahl]

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:32 AM, alx <a.si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Followed the latest commits on the node github repository and
> wondering why this change was made?

posix is too long and not descriptive enough. The commit is part of a
larger scheme to reorganize the file system functions.

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Gabriel Farrell <gsf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm guessing it's due to movements in that direction in CommonJS.
> http://wiki.commonjs.org/wiki/CommonJS

Not really.

> Ryan, looks like the fs.js file didn't make it into that commit.

'fs' is an internal module.

[Gabriel Farrell]

Ah, now I get it. +1 on shorter and more descriptive.