When will v2.0.0 be out? - node-websocket-server

The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Message from discussion When will v2.0.0 be out?
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 74.125.82.44 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of mich...@brandedcode.com) client-ip=74.125.82.44;
Subject: Re: [node-websocket-server] Re: When will v2.0.0 be out?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Micheil Smith <mich...@brandedcode.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADrYLAgRTDoQCAnhkuT4jHuRDj_Wfp2YRmBLZ_xUxi17qQ3=Bg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:54:54 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0D1B3365-DC33-474D-8CFD-8DC632FE4...@brandedcode.com>
References: <27049621.718.1315890969824.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqcd38> <cddf2583-a3bd-4647-bd1c-a46529676...@fe21g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <c4e73f77-1f30-4624-9b11-bbaa1c481...@w5g2000yqw.googlegroups.com> <20865033.2039.1318897852867.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prmr25> <ab556535-25f7-42e4-b1fb-c0701ed69...@j20g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <CADrYLAjVek8yoVdjkJtuD288HAgXJ+ZddJD2=G6u2oZx6JD...@mail.gmail.com> <3eb443cd-125a-453e-825e-935624161...@v8g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <CADrYLAiyhP_Ak4ct_oAEjBeNh1DJ+hTvP4eCjyY1p2vqM+f...@mail.gmail.com> <71141B28-D2D6-4FF5-99DD-4A57B5CD8...@brandedcode.com> <CADrYLAgRTDoQCAnhkuT4jHuRDj_Wfp2YRmBLZ_xUxi17qQ3...@mail.gmail.com>
To: node-websocket-server@googlegroups.com

Hi Joseph,=20

I'm glad we're at some point of understanding, this is exactly why the =
group=20
discussing the design of node-websocket-protocol is currently by invite =
only=20
of other members, as to only get the best people working on it and =
contributing=20
to it, rather than having these sort of discussions every few weeks.

It m,ay look like the project is dead, but that's just because we're all =
very busy=20
with day jobs, speaking, traveling, etc. Open Source is stuff that we do =
in our=20
free time, because we love what we do, so at times progress may seem =
slow,=20
but people are actually working really hard on these problems.

Kind Regards,
Micheil Smith
--
BrandedCode.com

On 18 Oct 2011, at 11:12, Joseph Gentle wrote:

> I have no interest in bikeshedding the websocket protocol. I wasn't
> trying to complain about it, I was commiserating. I haven't expressed
> my tone properly and I've rubbed you the wrong way. I never intended
> the offense that you've found in my messages. I'm sorry - I should
> have been more explicit about my tone. I know you talked to the
> socket.io and faye guys - I did read the email you sent, and I read
> your twitter feed. Rereading my email, I can see how you came to that
> conclusion.
>=20
> I support you in your grand plans and I'm looking forward to using
> what you come up with. I love using software written by people who
> really care a lot about the problem they're solving. I wish more
> software was like that. By using a committee, you'll write code more
> slowly and get more people involved in a bunch of decisions that you
> can just make yourself. (Micheil, you so obviously know websockets
> better than I do. You would do a much better job making an API than
> me). As you say though, your project, your call.
>=20
> I guess I'm just looking forward to using what you come up with, so
> long as its (as you say) done properly. For me that means that its
> been unit tested to the point that I can't think of any ways in which
> I can break it. I won't put socket.io or faye in production because
> they're both too buggy. (I'm working to get the bugs I've found
> resolved, but yeah. Done right is important.)
>=20
> Anyway, all the best.
> -Joseph
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Account Options
