Received: by 10.204.144.154 with SMTP id z26mr1852861bku.10.1317150873624;
        Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: nix-dev@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.135.155 with SMTP id n27ls282480bkt.0.gmail; Tue, 27 Sep
 2011 12:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.128.141 with SMTP id k13mr1913541bks.2.1317150872770;
        Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.128.141 with SMTP id k13mr1913540bks.2.1317150872752;
        Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <nemo.m...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com (mail-fx0-f41.google.com [209.85.161.41])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f27si4933219faf.2.2011.09.27.12.14.32
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nemo.m...@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.41;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nemo.m...@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nemo.m...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-fx0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 17so9842157fxh.14
        for <nix-dev@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=OQGgvg+jLyxIHoE44Vuoa9NbFYz+9gKg5VIy2NF3jl8=;
        b=f2PxYaU3qY+zJlFpa8CJ5yPtTK8vUoFBChp9/luwwiYZ43PWyEfQpIHW+3aNfwAPgp
         zy/BwbJYBDRVAHKlYl6fqGnxALeS/PCJr342xgd6BdZBIFDT6JVyG51KyOhjpEoBQYt4
         z5lGqhHK/SPi9vBBNTRbwm6Z0dxSqe2u4bREQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.97.220 with SMTP id m28mr13041980fan.20.1317150870495;
 Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: nemo.m...@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.119.202 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110927190702.EBDB0B...@mail.bitblocks.com>
References: <CA+N-5bZBcr75wF-H4Cs0oOf1m4XWyhcoZ16r=C8MRc_nisL...@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP6exYLnz5eoQmYTadAycWqczcrqfwOjhiZptruCRSUJexQ...@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110927190702.EBDB0B...@mail.bitblocks.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:14:30 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+N-5bYnVFqmnuOM0Htfa7eT-GT+u+Z+aFqkyVtUMui2fQd...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: killer application
From: Francisco J Ballesteros <n...@lsub.org>
To: nix-dev@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yes, a damn fast file server running in a nix box.
Or that=C2=B4s the idea. We=C2=B4d like to exploit what we can do
with cores and numa information to make it faster.

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Bakul Shah <ba...@bitblocks.com> wrote:
> From the subject line I thought you guys had found a killer
> app for nix to takeover from lunix :-)