Received: by 10.100.98.7 with SMTP id v7mr5670486anb.24.1317167403392;
        Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: nix-dev@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.100.237.8 with SMTP id k8ls988347anh.2.gmail; Tue, 27 Sep 2011
 16:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.101.25.13 with SMTP id c13mr6553807anj.22.1317167402928;
        Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.101.25.13 with SMTP id c13mr6553806anj.22.1317167402909;
        Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <quans...@quanstro.net>
Received: from ladd.quanstro.net (ladd.quanstro.net. [69.55.170.73])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id g1si24676805anp.1.2011.09.27.16.50.02;
        Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of quans...@quanstro.net designates 69.55.170.73 as permitted sender) client-ip=69.55.170.73;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of quans...@quanstro.net designates 69.55.170.73 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=quans...@quanstro.net
From: erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:39:38 -0400
To: nix-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: killer application
Message-ID: <d9136e073cfa8959d26ffffcb3f168fc@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CA+N-5bYVNkN4raS3zQ7eY6g-BS5dUC2io7XrQ9iA8o8wyix4bQ@mail.gmail.c>
References: <8211793c87e2f42ad4783a9a43e6a14f@quintile.net>
	<39152d6ec54271ec9dce198f863d631c@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<CA+N-5bYVNkN4raS3zQ7eY6g-BS5dUC2io7XrQ9iA8o8wyix4bQ@mail.gmail.c>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Tue Sep 27 17:40:03 EDT 2011, n...@lsub.org wrote:
> you could send it through code review.
> 
> I wouldn´t like many different bits and pieces to be found here and there,
> just to find some of them are not compatible with some others.
> That´s why we are taking the burden of using codereview in the first place.
> 
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:16 PM, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> wrote:
> > On Tue Sep 27 16:41:17 EDT 2011, st...@quintile.net wrote:
> >> > How are they not functional? Note that you'll need stallion/mercurial,
> >> > not the other one. Those work for me. You should be able to clone once
> >> > you have those.
> >>
> >> I tried an old package, I will try stallion tomorrow.
> >
> > here's an extension for playing nice with factotum:
> >
> > /n/sources/contrib/stallion/src/mercurial/factotum.py

it's not my code, so i would feel odd submitting it.

- erik