Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion After NH 3.3.0GA?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Diego Mijelshon  
View profile  
 More options Apr 24 2012, 1:00 pm
From: Diego Mijelshon <di...@mijelshon.com.ar>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:00:24 -0300
Local: Tues, Apr 24 2012 1:00 pm
Subject: Re: [nhibernate-development] After NH 3.3.0GA?

Async itself is compiler magic, but the ADO.NET async methods like
ExecuteReaderAsync are new in 4.5.
Without those, returning tasks from NH is pretty much useless.

    Diego

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:54, Darren Kopp <darrenk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To be fair, async is all compiler magic, so the only thing NHibernate has
> to do is return Task<T> and consumers could use async / await to their
> hearts content. It should be remembered that .net 4.5 is a superset of .net
> 4.0, and is separate from the compiler. The question becomes whether
> nhibernate will need to use the async / await keywords itself. Also, there
> is a project AsyncBridge that allows you to compile using the new compiler
> and still target 4.0, so that's an option as well.

> https://nuget.org/packages/AsyncBridge

> On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 6:34:43 AM UTC-6, Diego Mijelshon wrote:

>> IMO, it _is_ important when it's directly related to the features each
>> framework provides.
>> I believe async will be quickly become a big deal, so that's something to
>> consider. But there's nothing* stopping us from using conditional
>> directives to enable 4.5 features. NuGet also supports painless
>> multi-framework packages out of the box.

>>     Diego

>> *: except time/resource constraints, of course

>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 06:07, Ramon Smits <ramon.smits> wrote:

>>> Is it really usefull to discuss which framework to target?

>>> I think it is more wise to discuss a roadmap with coming versions and
>>> which features those roadmap versions will contain and let that be the
>>> input to decide which framework(s) to target.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.