Hey, CD, snow on saturday???

[rohodster]

CD, if you're there, do you see us getting much snow this weekend?????

[Darryl Harding]

On Dec 18, 8:46 am, rohodster <rohods...@gmail.com> wrote:
> CD, if you're there, do you see us getting much snow this weekend?????

worse case scenario...yupper
best case scenario.....nope
best bet...wait til saturday to be sure

hehe

thanks
Darryl

[clouddreamer]

rohodster wrote:
> CD, if you're there, do you see us getting much snow this weekend?????

I don't see anything big for the Avalon. A dusting of a 5-10 cm tomorrow
looks to be worst of it so far though the wind might cause a few
whiteouts on the highway. Chance the temps might turn some of it to rain
later on too. The few days after that are an unsettled mix...cloud,
flurries, showers etc.

No big storms on the horizon at this point though.

:]

--
We must change the way we live
Or the climate will do it for us.

[Corey]

On 12/18/2009 9:22 AM, clouddreamer wrote:
> rohodster wrote:
>> CD, if you're there, do you see us getting much snow this weekend?????
>
>
> I don't see anything big for the Avalon. A dusting of a 5-10 cm tomorrow
> looks to be worst of it so far though the wind might cause a few
> whiteouts on the highway. Chance the temps might turn some of it to rain
> later on too. The few days after that are an unsettled mix...cloud,
> flurries, showers etc.
>
> No big storms on the horizon at this point though.
>
> :]
>

I have to ask cause I'm fairly new to the groups. What do you do for a
living? Or, better question, how do you know so much about the weather
and are more right than people on tv/radio?

[HB]

so basically we are looking at a possibly of having or not having, some sort
of mixed bag of possible precipitation or not, within the next week or
so....

I was thinking the same thing....

"clouddreamer" <Reuse....@nd.Reduce.now> wrote in message
news:0bGdneovqKq-5rbW...@supernews.com...

[Carter]

Corey, she is no more right, or wrong, than the people on TV or
radio. The fact is she gets her information from the same place
as they do, generally Environment Canada.

Those who come here asking CD what she thinks about the weather
can easily get the same information that she would provide from
any of the weather sites on the internet, or from TV or radio.

Carter

[Darryl Harding]

but to his/her credit , those folks know he/she will do the work for
them so y not take advantage of that. it is a great service he/she
provides, nothing more nothing less, and it is greatly appreciated by
those that partake of the service.

i believe the issue of any "knowledge" or "expertise" that he/she has
or doesnt have has been dealt with and put to bed, \

it is a great service to those that havent got the time or dont want
to take the time to do it themselves

thanks
darryl

[Carter]

LOL! It takes far less time to log onto EC, and immediately get
the weather information you are looking for from professionals,
than it does to ask here and wait for a reply.

Carter

[Browser]

On Dec 18, 11:24 am, Darryl Harding <darryl_hard...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

I agree!!
Great service CD..
At least it useful to some people.

As opposed to some comments or shall I say dribble made here...

[Darryl Harding]

On Dec 18, 12:12 pm, Carter <per_ardua@ad_astra> wrote:

> LOL!  It takes far less time to log onto EC, and immediately get
> the weather information you are looking for from professionals,
> than it does to ask here and wait for a reply.
>
> Carter

POINT TAKEN

[Uncle Mose]

On Dec 18, 12:12 pm, Carter <per_ardua@ad_astra> wrote:

> Carter- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Once again I find myself agreeing with you Carter ole man. That’s
getting scary to me.
Nothing wrong with CD giving her take on the weather but I find it
amusing that people log on here and ask her for weather info, when
they could just as easily go to Environment Canada or The Weather
Network and get the same info. Sure you can even go to both these and
other weather web sites to get the local weather synopsis and
interpret it yourself. Why wait for CD’s info when it’s just a click
away? Basically she’s giving the same forecast as EC and TWN.

[Darryl Harding]

again,

point taken,

thanks
Darryl

[84BlackGTI]

Who is only using CD for their info? Who is waiting for it, like you
suggest?
I usually check both Environment Canada, TWN and here for CDs info.
Personally I get more from CDs postings then the other sites. That
wont stop me from checking them too though. Helps to be cautious when
you do a lot of winter driving over the TCH and Salmonair line.
So just because you can check a website easier then CDs postings here,
doesnt change anything. Im sure, like me, most people are using CDs
post in conjunction with other sources, not in place of them. People
just love to find something to be negative about.

[Darryl Harding]

hi,

i didnt see anything in a negative light in this thread, what are you
referring too??

thanks
Darryl

[Uncle Mose]

On Dec 18, 2:13 pm, 84BlackGTI <christopherphi...@gmail.com> wrote:

Nothing negative at all just pointing out simple facts. I wonder why
you would rely on someone’s amateur forecast other than that of
professional weather forecasters? Why would you take her word versus
that of Environment Canada? What does she add that isn't in the EC
forecast? Nothing as far as I can see. She's not adding anything to
EC's forecast just a rehash of their written synopsis in her own
words. Nothing negative about it. Like I said nothing wrong with her
giving her forecast but I don't see why people have to ask for
information on here that can be gotten from a more reliable source.
Would you take medical advice from someone on here other than a
medical professional? Would you take legal advice from someone on here
other than a legal expert? Nothing wrong with giving opinions on
subjects here but to rely on it as a source of factual information
without any knowledge if the person giving the information is a
professional in the field is anecdotal at best.

[zippybear]

On Dec 18, 8:46 am, rohodster <rohods...@gmail.com> wrote:

> CD, if you're there, do you see us getting much snow this weekend?????

CD, how dare you have an opinion on a subject so touchy as the
weather ;-)

<3

[Darryl Harding]

hilarious,

thanks
Darryl

[84BlackGTI]

Like I said, people use her info along with other sources. I dont
think anyone relys on her information alone.
Your post makes no sense. People use Environment Canada but still
want to hear from CD. There is nothing wrong with that.

[clouddreamer]

I'm a retired young veteran with a love of weather and climate going
back to grade 3. As you can see from the responses, some people have a
real problem with that...I just offer my opinion on weather systems
using all the available information online - beyond EC's 5 day or TWN
forecasts (unlike some think <elbow. Pointing. Carter>. My primary
interest is long term trends (climate change) and seasonal patterns.

And I'm a woman...though some still have a problem believing that. LOL

:)

[Snipe]

Carter wrote:
> Corey wrote:
>> On 12/18/2009 9:22 AM, clouddreamer wrote:
>>> rohodster wrote:

>> I have to ask cause I'm fairly new to the groups. What do you do for
>> a living? Or, better question, how do you know so much about the
>> weather and are more right than people on tv/radio?
>
> Corey, she is no more right, or wrong, than the people on TV or radio.

Even if she was you wouldn't admit to it...

> Those who come here asking CD what she thinks about the weather can
> easily get the same information that she would provide from any of the
> weather sites on the internet, or from TV or radio.

It must really irk you that someone like CD can provide useful
information to those who seek it, while the best you can do is to
provide some trivial condescension...

snipe

>
> Carter

[Darryl Harding]

On Dec 18, 5:04 pm, Snipe <compusn...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> It must really irk you that someone like CD can provide useful
> information to those who seek it, while the best you can do is to
> provide some trivial condescension...
>
> snipe
>

it is very chivalrous of you to continuously come to clouds aid.

kudos

Darryl

[VK1NF]

On Dec 18, 11:06 am, Carter <per_ardua@ad_astra> wrote:

We watch the weather closely, especially in the summer, when we spend
a fair bit of time on the salt water in small paddlecraft. While we
use EC sources as our main reference, I find that CD often adds
information that isn't in the main forecasts - jet stream activity,
movement of major systems, etc., and this helps me better understand
why the forecast is as it is.

Re professionals - the only difference by definition between amateurs
and professionals is that the pros get paid - they may, or may not, be
better at interpreting the data available to both. T^he amateur may
also have the advantage of looking at a far smaller area - for
example, we live in Upper Gullies, and I can often 'predict' that the
20 cms. forecast for St. John's at -2 will be rain, or far less snow,
out here. It's called 'local knowledge'. If you don't need or
appreciate CDs input, don't open the thread. Then you won't find the
urgent need, at every post, to repeat the same old, same old whinging
and whining...

[Davvee]

Corey, CD often gives us weather related information that EC or TWN
don't. She offers travellers realistic weather reports and while she is
not a professional (nor does she tout herself as being one) she is kind
enough to share her expertise with those of us who are interested in
asking for it.

[Davvee]

As one of those who occasionally asks CD for her advice, I can attest to
the fact that she often goes well beyond what EC and TWN offer.

> Once again I find myself agreeing with you Carter ole man. That�s

> getting scary to me.
> Nothing wrong with CD giving her take on the weather but I find it
> amusing that people log on here and ask her for weather info, when
> they could just as easily go to Environment Canada or The Weather
> Network and get the same info. Sure you can even go to both these and
> other weather web sites to get the local weather synopsis and

> interpret it yourself. Why wait for CD�s info when it�s just a click
> away? Basically she�s giving the same forecast as EC and TWN.

[Davvee]

84BlackGTI wrote:
> Like I said, people use her info along with other sources. I dont
> think anyone relys on her information alone.
> Your post makes no sense. People use Environment Canada but still
> want to hear from CD. There is nothing wrong with that.

EXACTLY!!!!

[Darryl Harding]

On Dec 18, 6:30 pm, VK1NF <rhayesn...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> We watch the weather closely, especially in the summer, when we spend
> a fair bit of time on the salt water in small paddlecraft.

i suggest the fishermans broadcast or even sw 780 i think it is they
have contiuopus weather reports for seafarers

good luck and stay safe

thanks
darryl

[Darryl Harding]

sorry should have read sw 128 not 780

thanks

Darryl

[Snipe]

I'd do the same for anyone here that I feel is getting a bum rap. She
obviously enjoys her hobby and others enjoy the benefit of seeking her
opinion. Is that so bad?

At least she's not logging in each day like some and waiting for someone
to make a trivial spelling or grammatical error just to add a
condescending remark about their perceived intelligence...

snipe

>
> Darryl
>

[Darryl Harding]

he i said many times it is a great service that he/she is providing,
but that is the extent of it, there is no expertise or knowledge
involved in the least but it takes a lot of time and energy for him/
her to actually collect the information for recognized sources and
then pass it on...

thanks
Darryl

[Snipe]

Whatever...

snipe

>
> thanks
> Darryl
>

[clouddreamer]

Yup. He still doesn't even have the common courtesy to refer to me as
"her."

And to think he has the gall to ask me out for a coffee...he is still a
low-life bully. Not worth the time of day, let alone the price of a
coffee...

..

[Corey]

>
>
> Yup. He still doesn't even have the common courtesy to refer to me as
> "her."
>
> And to think he has the gall to ask me out for a coffee...he is still a
> low-life bully. Not worth the time of day, let alone the price of a
> coffee...
>
> ..

Despite the trolls, I appreciate the time you take.

[Darryl Harding]

as do i , as i have said many many times

thanks
Darryl

[clouddreamer]

<blush>

;D

[Charles]

The most ignorant are those without any capacity to recognize it. The most
repulsive of those are the ones who think their ignorance is somehow
entertaining.
-

"clouddreamer" <saveth...@save.money.too> wrote in message
news:GKednQL54Z2eQLLW...@supernews.com...
> Snipe wrote:

[Darryl Harding]

On Dec 22, 1:54 pm, "Charles" <charles1998NOS...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The most ignorant are those without any capacity to recognize it. The most
> repulsive of those are the ones who think their ignorance is somehow
> entertaining.
> -

I couldn't agree more, as i have said many many times it is a great
service that is being provided for those that take some solace and
comfort from it.

it takes a lot of time and energy to actually collect the information
from recognized sources and
then pass it on...a lot of folks wouldn't even consider assisting, and
that is commendable for sure.

my offer for a java is perpetual and will continue to be, as I am sure
the refusal to accept is, and that is both unfortunate and sad. One
would hope that another would have seen a certain change in stance and
position, One can always hope.

thanks
Darryl

[G R Easton]

Darryl, whether you know it or not, you have been quite condescending
towards CD and Her take on the weather and forecasting. She does do more
than simply google and regurgitate. She does interpret and put her own spin
on what the raw data says. Yes, anybody can find that data put how many can
actually interpret it? Some of us actually find it more accurate than the
"professional" forecast at times. And more honest as She is not afraid to
say that there are variables that are beyond anybodys control that could go
either way.

Her admitted amateur status in no way diminishes Her value any more than any
other talented amateur in whatever field. There are many other individuals
here who have no piece of paper attesting to their qualifications but yet
offer good advice based on their own experience and interest. There are far
more people offering useless or downright nasty opinions and we should
appreciate those that at least try to be helpful.

Hope that helps and stop by the next time you're in the building.

"Darryl Harding" <darryl_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f02e7568-273f-457c...@g23g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...

[Darryl Harding]

On Dec 22, 6:10 pm, "G R Easton" <greas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Darryl, whether you know it or not, you have been quite condescending
> towards CD and Her take on the weather and forecasting.

i agree but, and this is a big but....not recently as before though,
geoff, in fact i have come to the defense on several occasions, but i
do hear what you are saying

Yes, anybody can find that data put how many can
> actually interpret it?

interesting

Some of us actually find it more accurate than the
> "professional" forecast at times.

u had me until then,

thanks for taking the time to offer that, it is quite accurate in
several parts,

like i said, times change, people mellow, my invite is perpetual but
i am sure the discarding of it is as well

thanks

and have a great holiday season

Darryl

[Charles]

...and so the self-delusion continues. Pitiful.

--

"Darryl Harding" <darryl_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f02e7568-273f-457c...@g23g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...

[Darryl Harding]

On Dec 22, 8:40 pm, "Charles" <charles1998NOS...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...and so the self-delusion continues. Pitiful.
>
> --

those in glass houses..........

thanks and i wish you and your family a happy holiday season and joy
health and happiness in the new year

Darryl

[Charles]

Scary.

--

"Darryl Harding" <darryl_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:25892699-db1f-40d9...@19g2000vbq.googlegroups.com...

[Darryl Harding]

On Dec 23, 6:35 am, "Charles" <charles1998NOS...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Scary.

>
> those in glass houses..........
>
> thanks and i wish you and your family a happy holiday season and joy
> health and happiness in the new year
>
> Darryl

hi charles,

Dont be scared, Let go of old hatreds and ill wills ...... it isnt
healthy to hang on to grudges or preconceptions

start yer new year off with an open mind and let go of old
preconceptions. People evolve. People and perceptions can change.
Don't judge others til u walk a mile in their shoes.

and again, those in glass houses......

sincere well wishes for the new year and years to come. We all have
room to improve in our lives, dont ridicule those that are at least
trying their best....And keep up the great work on your website

God Bless

Darryl

[Snipe]

G R Easton wrote:
> Darryl, whether you know it or not, you have been quite condescending
> towards CD and Her take on the weather and forecasting. She does do more
> than simply google and regurgitate. She does interpret and put her own
> spin on what the raw data says. Yes, anybody can find that data put how
> many can actually interpret it? Some of us actually find it more
> accurate than the "professional" forecast at times. And more honest as
> She is not afraid to say that there are variables that are beyond
> anybodys control that could go either way.
>
> Her admitted amateur status in no way diminishes Her value any more than
> any other talented amateur in whatever field. There are many other
> individuals here who have no piece of paper attesting to their
> qualifications but yet offer good advice based on their own experience
> and interest. There are far more people offering useless or downright
> nasty opinions and we should appreciate those that at least try to be
> helpful.

Well said! If only everyone in this group could be so accommodating and
as helpful as CD.

snipe

[Snipe]

Darryl Harding wrote:
> On Dec 22, 6:10 pm, "G R Easton" <greas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Darryl, whether you know it or not, you have been quite condescending
>> towards CD and Her take on the weather and forecasting.
>
> i agree but, and this is a big but....not recently as before though,
> geoff, in fact i have come to the defense on several occasions, but i
> do hear what you are saying

LOL...yeah sure you have...So how long is "recently"? You don't
consider what you said three days ago condescending?:

"i said many times it is a great service that he/she is providing,but

that is the extent of it, there is no expertise or knowledge involved in

the least but it takes a lot of time and energy for him/her"

If that is not condescension I don't know what is. You need to look up
the meaning of the word. You can't even refer to her as a female
individual. You have been informed MANY times that she is a female and
yet you still refer to her as he/she. Not to mention the fact that you
say that it takes NO expertise or knowledge to do what she does...

And then you say that you are defending her...lol. I'm pretty sure she
can do without your defense...

While you're looking up the meaning of condescension try looking up the
definition of cognitive dissonance. lol

> Yes, anybody can find that data put how many can
>> actually interpret it?
>
> interesting
>
> Some of us actually find it more accurate than the
>> "professional" forecast at times.
>
> u had me until then,
>
>

> like i said, times change, people mellow, my invite is perpetual but
> i am sure the discarding of it is as well

Look it up...cognitive dissonance.

snipe

[Darryl Harding]

On Dec 23, 1:42 pm, Snipe <compusn...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Darryl Harding wrote:
> > On Dec 22, 6:10 pm, "G R Easton" <greas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Darryl, whether you know it or not, you have been quite condescending
> >> towards CD and Her take on the weather and forecasting.
>
> > i agree but, and this is a big but....not recently as before though,
> > geoff, in fact i have come to the defense on several occasions, but i
> > do hear what you are saying
>
> LOL...yeah sure you have...So how long is "recently"?  You don't
> consider what you said three days ago condescending?:
>
> "i said many times it is a great service that he/she is providing,but
> that is the extent of it, there is no expertise or knowledge involved in
> the least but it takes a lot of time and energy for him/her"
>
> If that is not condescension I don't know what is.

i think u misunderstood my post. i was applauding the time and energy
that it takes to do such a service for people

You can't even refer to her as a female
> individual.

i dont know that, do u??

You have been informed MANY times that she is a female

but only by those that dont really know themselves...and for me that
is not important any more as the content of the post is what i try to
focus on and not the poster.....it is a work in progress i agree, but
i am working on it...dont be so eager to take a peice off me when i am
trying and will try harder...

in fact i am working on that and am referring to the post and not the
poster as much as i can npow and in the future.

> > like i said, times change, people mellow, my invite is perpetual but
> > i am sure the discarding of it is as well
>

thanks and a happy holidays and healthy new year to you and yours

Darryl

[Snipe]

Darryl Harding wrote:
> i think u misunderstood my post. i was applauding the time and energy
> that it takes to do such a service for people

No I didn't misunderstand anything. I was back-handed whether you
realize it or not.

> You can't even refer to her as a female
>> individual.
>
> i dont know that, do u??

Yes I do, and so do you. She has told you herself several times yet you
refuse to believe her. You've not met most of the other posters here
either but you have no problem believing their gender.

>
>> You have been informed MANY times that she is a female
>
> but only by those that dont really know themselves...

Are you suggesting that CD doesn't know herself if she is a male or
female? She has told you herself many times. What reason do you have
not to believe her.

> and for me that
> is not important any more as the content of the post is what i try to
> focus on and not the poster

LOL...that is a crock of shit. So why the he/she then? Why do you
belittle her knowledge of the weather? Why do you feel that you have to
hi-jack every post where someone asks her about a weather forecast?

> .....it is a work in progress i agree, but
> i am working on it...dont be so eager to take a peice off me when i am
> trying and will try harder...

Is being civil really that foreign to you that you must work on it and
try harder. You wouldn't know but she was asking you to learn a second
language...Perhaps she is...

>
> in fact i am working on that and am referring to the post and not the
> poster as much as i can npow and in the future.

See above...I see a new years resolution coming on...lol

> thanks and a happy holidays and healthy new year to you and yours

same to you and yours...

snipe

>
> Darryl

[Darryl Harding]

On Dec 24, 12:03 am, Snipe <compusn...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > You can't even refer to her as a female
> >> individual.
>
> > i dont know that, do u??
>
> Yes I do, and so do you.  She has told you herself several times yet you
> refuse to believe her.  

sorry havent netthe poster , and havent had any contact with anyone
that has.

You've not met most of the other posters here
> either but you have no problem believing their gender.

it has never before been an issue for me and i will not ever address
it again with this poster as it is not important to me from this point
forward, the poster has given greatly in terms of time and energy for
the service of others, that is all that matters to me

> > and for me that
> > is not important any more as the content of the post is what i try to
> > focus on and not the poster
>
> LOL...that is a crock of shit.  

sticks and stones.....

.....it is a work in progress i agree, but
i am working on it...dont be so eager to take a peice off me when i
am
trying and will try harder...

> You wouldn't know but she was asking you to learn a second
> language...

i dont think the poster has ever asked me to learn anything,

> > in fact i am working on that and am referring to the post and not the

> > poster as much as i can now and in the future.

> > thanks and a happy holidays and healthy new year to you and yours

thanks
Darryl

[Charles]

For some personalities, Snipe, positive and negative attention are equally
reinforcing. They feed on both with equal appetite.

--

"Snipe" <compu...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b32d9f7$0$5352$9a56...@news.aliant.net...

[Darryl Harding]

On Dec 24, 11:13 am, "Charles" <charles1998NOS...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For some personalities, Snipe, positive and negative attention are equally
> reinforcing. They feed on both with equal appetite.

hahah way to go dr phil

whatever,

those that live in glass houses.........

happy holidays and a healthy mew year to you and yours

darryl

[Snipe]

Charles wrote:
> For some personalities, Snipe, positive and negative attention are
> equally reinforcing. They feed on both with equal appetite.
>

Yeah, I know. Harding seeks attention at all cost. He's unable to
distinguish between neg & pos reinforcement. It is all positive to
him...It doesn't matter that he looks like a fool in the process. In
his deluded mind he is always right...

But he's an intriguing subject who likes having his chain pulled. And,
most times I like pulling it... ;-)

snipe

[Snipe]

Darryl Harding wrote:
> On Dec 24, 11:13 am, "Charles" <charles1998NOS...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> For some personalities, Snipe, positive and negative attention are equally
>> reinforcing. They feed on both with equal appetite.
>
> hahah way to go dr phil
>

One hardly needs to be a Dr. to figure you out...

>
> whatever,
>
> those that live in glass houses.........

hmmm like solar energy? ;-)

snipe

[Snipe]

Darryl Harding wrote:
> On Dec 24, 12:03 am, Snipe <compusn...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> You can't even refer to her as a female
>>>> individual.
>>> i dont know that, do u??
>> Yes I do, and so do you. She has told you herself several times yet you
>> refuse to believe her.
>
> sorry havent netthe poster , and havent had any contact with anyone
> that has.

So, I haven't met you either...but I'll take your word for it that you
are a male...

>
> You've not met most of the other posters here
>> either but you have no problem believing their gender.
>

> it has never before been an issue for me...

LOL...Yeah right!...do you even read what you type?

>> LOL...that is a crock of shit.
>
> sticks and stones.....

What's with the out of context childish phrases?

>> You wouldn't know but she was asking you to learn a second
>> language...
>
> i dont think the poster has ever asked me to learn anything,
>

Wooooosh...Way over the head...

snipe

thanks
> Darryl
>
>

[duende]

Jesus, it's blowing my mind how much of an asshole Harding is being.

[Darryl Harding]

On Dec 25, 12:06 am, duende <cquill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jesus, it's blowing my mind how much of an asshole Harding is being.

ssshhhh

think happy thoughts, its bait by its bait
wink

all fun and games til someone loses an eye

have a great holiday season all

Darryl

ps, you too cloud, i mean that

[Charles]

Sorry Snipe, but Darryl went from intriging to insulting a long time ago.
His Christmas lamentations were right on cue though; pitifully predictable.
I have no idea who he thinks he's fooling, much less impressing.

Happy Holidays to you and yours, Snipe.

--

"Snipe" <compu...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:4b33c60a$0$5341$9a56...@news.aliant.net...

[Darryl Harding]

On Dec 25, 8:58 am, "Charles" <charles1998NOS...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry Snipe, but Darryl went from intriging to insulting a long time ago.
> His Christmas lamentations were right on cue though; pitifully predictable.
> I have no idea who he thinks he's fooling, much less impressing.
>
> Happy Holidays to you and yours, Snipe.
>
> --
>

> "Snipe" <compusn...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

>
> news:4b33c60a$0$5341$9a56...@news.aliant.net...
>
> > Charles wrote:
> >> For some personalities, Snipe, positive and negative attention are
> >> equally reinforcing. They feed on both with equal appetite.
>
> > Yeah, I know.  Harding seeks attention at all cost. He's unable to
> > distinguish between neg & pos reinforcement.  It is all positive to
> > him...It doesn't matter that he looks like a fool in the process.  In his
> > deluded mind he is always right...
>
> > But he's an intriguing subject who likes having his chain pulled. And,
> > most times I like pulling it...  ;-)
>
> > snipe

merry xmas charles, i will not retort any of your negative posts any
more, i just feel the flames,

have a happy and healthy prosperous and joyous new year

thanks
Darryl

[Charles]

Beats seeing the truth, I suppose.

I'll wish you the gift of self-awareness instead of Happy Holidays; you need
that much worse.

--

[Darryl Harding]

np

thanks for the well wishes and remeber

those in glass houses.........

thanks
Darryl

[Darryl Harding]

On Dec 25, 11:42 am, Darryl Harding <darryl_hard...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

tell us what santa brung ya

thanks
Darryl

[Uncle Mose]

On Dec 25, 11:46 am, Darryl Harding <darryl_hard...@hotmail.com>

> Darryl- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

LMAO! I got all kinds of nice stuff but I feel sad for you, ;-
( cause I know all ya got was a lump of coal according to this
post. ;-) Merr yChristmas.

[Darryl Harding]

yeah but it was charcoal so i guess ill learn how to draw

meryy ho hoh

Darryl