Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
* William Engdahl: Nano Particles in H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines *
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Richard Moore  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4 2009, 11:39 am
From: Richard Moore <r...@quaylargo.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:39:38 +0000
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 11:39 am
Subject: * William Engdahl: Nano Particles in H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines *

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15092

Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines
Part III: ‘It’s the vaccines, Stupid!

By F. William Engdahl

Global Research, September 13, 2009

Vaccines which have been approved by the responsible government  
authorities for vaccination against the alleged H1N1 Influenza A Swine  
Flu have been found to contain nano particles. Vaccine makers have  
been experimenting with nanoparticles as a way to “turbo charge”  
vaccines for several years. Now it has come out that the vaccines  
approved for use in Germany and other European countries contain  
nanoparticles in a form that reportedly attacks healthy cells and can  
be deadly.

In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne  
(EPFL) announced in an article in the journal, Nature Biotechnology,  
that they had developed  a “nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines  
more effectively, with fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the  
cost of current vaccine technologies.” The article went on to describe  
the effects of their breakthrough: “At a mere 25 nanometers, these  
particles are so tiny that once injected, they flow through the skin’s  
extracellular matrix, making a beeline to the lymph nodes. Within  
minutes, they’ve reached a concentration of DCs thousands of times  
greater than in the skin. The immune response can then be extremely  
strong and effective.” 1

There is only one small problem with vaccines containing nanoparticles—
they can be deadly and at the least cause severe irreparable health  
damage.

Nanoparticles, promoted in the mass media as the new wonder revolution  
of science, are particles that have been produced vastly smaller than  
deadly asbestos particles which caused severe lung damage and death  
before being outlawed. Particles at a nano size, (nm = 0,000000001  
Meter) fuse together with the membranes of our body cell membranes  
and, according to recent studies in China and Japan, continuously  
destroy cells once introduced into the body. Once they interact with  
the body’s cellular structure, they cannot be removed. Modern medicine  
euphemistically terms the phenomenon, a continuing infectious reaction.

Since the asbestos scandal, it has been established that particles in  
size a millionth of a meter, because of their enormous attractive  
force, penetrate all cells, destroying all those they come into  
contact with. Nanoparticles are far smaller than asbestos fibers.
Beijing Tests confirm deadly effects on humans
The fact that WHO, the European Medicines Evaluation Agency, the  
German Robert Koch Institute and other health bodies today would  
permit the population to be injected with largely untested novel  
vaccines containing nanoparticles says more about the powerful pharma  
lobby in Euiropean politics than it does about the sanity or moral  
integrity of the civil servants responsible for health of the general  
public.
The September 2009 issue of the respected European Respiratory  
Journal, made public on 19 August, and available since 21 August  
online, contains a peer-reviewed article with the title, “Exposure to  
nanoparticles is related to pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and  
granuloma.”
The article describes tests carried out in 2008 at the elite Beijing  
Chaoyang Hospital on seven young women. All seven, ages 18-47 had been  
exposed to nanoparticles for 5–13 months in their common workplace.  
All were admitted to the hospital with shortness of breath and pleural  
effusions, or excessive fluids surrounding the lungs, inhibiting  
breathing. None of the seven had ever smoked and none were in any  
special risk group. Doctors carefully tested for every possibility and  
confirmed that the lung problems had a common origin—regular  
inhalation of nanoparticles in their factory. They had been exposed to  
Polyacrylat nanoparticles.
The tests confirmed the nanoparticles had set off a “super-meltdown”  
reaction in the patients. Despite all heroic efforts of doctors, two  
of the seven died from the lung complications. 2
In their report, the scientists concluded something so alarming it is  
necessary to quote at length:
“Immunological tests, examinations of bacteriology, virology and  
tumour markers, bronchoscopy, internal thoracoscopy and video-assisted  
thoracic surgery were performed. Surveys of the workplace, clinical  
observations and examinations of the patients were conducted.  
Polyacrylate, consisting of nanoparticles, was confirmed in the  
workplace. Pathological examinations of patients' lung tissue  
displayed nonspecific pulmonary inflammation, pulmonary fibrosis and  
foreign-body granulomas of pleura. Using transmission electron  
microscopy, nanoparticles were observed to lodge in the cytoplasm and  
caryoplasm of pulmonary epithelial and mesothelial cells, but are also  
located in the chest fluid. These cases arouse concern that long-term  
exposure to some nanoparticles without protective measures may be  
related to serious damage to human lungs.“3
To date Animal studies and in vitro experiments show that  
nanoparticles can result in lung damage and other toxicity in animals,  
but no reports on the clinical toxicity in humans due to nanoparticles  
prior to the Beijing study had been made.
The Beijing Chaoyang Hospital study has now conclusively confirmed  
that nanoparticles cause lung damage and other toxicity in humans as  
well. At this point in time, when two of the approved vaccines planned  
to be mass distributed in Germany and elsewhere contain nanoparticles,  
failure of the relevant responsible public health and epidemiology  
officials to order an immediate emergency freeze on distribution of  
any vaccine containing nanoparticles can only be considered tantamount  
to criminal negligence. Hopefully the responsible authorities will  
react in time to avert a possible human health catastrophe orders of  
magnitude worse than the worst case of Swine Flu reported to date.

F. William Engdahl is author of Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian  
Democracy in the New World Order. He may be reached via his website, www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net

Notes:

1 EPFL, Bioengineering researchers from the EPFL in Lausanne,  
Switzerland, have developed and patented a nanoparticle that can  
deliver vaccines more effectively, with fewer side effects, and at a  
fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies, accessed in www.azonano.com/nanotechnology%20news.asp?catid=13
.

2  Song Y, Li X, Du X, Exposure to nanoparticles is related to pleural  
effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma, European Respiratory  
Journal, 9/2009, 34(3): 559-567.

3 Ibid.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole  
responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of  
the Centre for Research on Globalization. The contents of this article  
are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research  
on Globalization will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate  
or incorrect statements contained in this article.

To become a Member of Global Research

The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research  
articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are  
not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed.  
For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms  
including commercial internet sites, contact: crgedi...@yahoo.com

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which  
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We  
are making such material available to our readers under the provisions  
of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of  
political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is  
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior  
interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you  
wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use"  
you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: crgedi...@yahoo.com

© Copyright F. William Engdahl, Global Research, 2009

The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=15092

© Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca
Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia © Copyright 2005-2007

___________________________
subscribe mailto:
newslog+subscribe@googlegroups.com

websites:
http://www.governourselves.org/
http://escapingthematrix.org/
http://thecreditbankdevelopmentmodel.blogspot.com/
http://cyberjournal.org

archives:
http://groups.google.com/group/newslog/topics
http://groups.google.com/group/cyberjournal/topics

Moderator: r...@quaylargo.com  (comments welcome)


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google