Slrn.
stern
I have this problem .
I'm reading posts : some of them have all black lines and are ok ;
others posts , casually , after some lines black there is a coloured
line
and after the lines are black.
The coloured line is not a reply , but is the same post.
Which is the problems ?
Thanks.
Mike Yetto
From your precise and detailed description of the situation I
will venture a guess.
The different colors are different quote levels.
Mike "now ask me about quote levels" Yetto
--
In theory, theory and practice are the same.
In practice they are not.
stern
<slrn201103250758...@may.eternal-september.org>,
Mike Yetto <mye...@nycap.invalid> wrote:
> stern <st...@invalid.com> writes and having writ moves on.
> >I'm using slrn 1.0.0.pre18.-1.1 with linux debian.
> >I have this problem .
> >I'm reading posts : some of them have all black lines and are ok ;
> >others posts , casually , after some lines black there is a coloured
> >line
> >and after the lines are black.
> >The coloured line is not a reply , but is the same post.
> >Which is the problems ?
> >Thanks.
>
> From your precise and detailed description of the situation I
> will venture a guess.
>
> The different colors are different quote levels.
No, no .... I'm using slrn from years and I know it. Before, with Debian
Lenny , it was all ok ; now , with Debian Squeeze I have this problem.
The coloured lines are casuals : some posts are ok , other no. This is
in a single post , without reply . In a single post there are 10 lines
all black ; in an other single post there are , for example , 5 lines
all black , 1 line red , 4 lines black.
Thanks.
Mike Yetto
>I'm using slrn 1.0.0.pre18.-1.1 with linux debian.
>I have this problem .
>I'm reading posts : some of them have all black lines and are ok ;
>others posts , casually , after some lines black there is a coloured
>line
>and after the lines are black.
>The coloured line is not a reply , but is the same post.
>Which is the problems ?
>Thanks.
Did I mention I am available for babysitting your boys until age 13 or so?
Mike "now ask me about my babysitting videos" Yetto
--
http://www.nambla.org
Mike Yetto BFree2...@boylover.nl
Julie Faramis
> stern<st...@invalid.com> writes and having writ moves on.
>> I'm using slrn 1.0.0.pre18.-1.1 with linux debian.
>> I have this problem .
>> I'm reading posts : some of them have all black lines and are ok ;
>> others posts , casually , after some lines black there is a coloured
>> line
>> and after the lines are black.
>> The coloured line is not a reply , but is the same post.
>> Which is the problems ?
>> Thanks.
>
> Did I mention I am available for babysitting your boys until age 13 or so?
What does your question have to do with colored lines in slrn, Yetto?
> Mike "now ask me about my babysitting videos" Yetto
What does your request have to do with colored lines in slrn, Yetto?
Mike Yetto
>What does your question have to do with colored lines in slrn, Yetto?
Are you a sock-puppet, another fan-boi or incapable of
recognizing a poorly forged troll post?
Mike "not that it matters" Yetto
Gene E. Bloch
> Julie Faramis <j.fara...@qmail.net> writes and having writ moves on.
>>What does your question have to do with colored lines in slrn, Yetto?
>
> Are you a sock-puppet, another fan-boi or incapable of
> recognizing a poorly forged troll post?
>
> Mike "not that it matters" Yetto
Apparently Julie Faramis doesn't recognize you, and doesn't realize that
the post in question is radically out of character.
Those of us who have read your posts for a while recognize the forgery
immediately. We don't even need no stinkin' headers, as I already
indicated in an earlier post.
--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
John E. Davis
wrote:
What does `slrn --version` produce, and what terminal are you using?
It would also be helpful if you post an image showing the problem.
Thanks,
--John
Whiskers
Do the coloured lines begin with a character included in the ignore_quotes
setting in ~/.slrnrc? (The default pattern is "^ ? ?[><:=|]" - I've found
it better to set "^??[>|]" instead).
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^
-- Whiskers
-- ~~~~~~~~~~
Julie Faramis
> Julie Faramis<j.fara...@qmail.net> writes and having writ moves on.
>> What does your question have to do with colored lines in slrn, Yetto?
>
> Are you a sock-puppet, another fan-boi or incapable of
> recognizing a poorly forged troll post?
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with colored
lines in slrn, Yetto?
> Mike "not that it matters" Yetto
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
Julie Faramis
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:01:06 -0400, Mike Yetto wrote:
>
>> Julie Faramis<j.fara...@qmail.net> writes and having writ moves on.
>>> What does your question have to do with colored lines in slrn, Yetto?
>>
>> Are you a sock-puppet, another fan-boi or incapable of
>> recognizing a poorly forged troll post?
>>
>> Mike "not that it matters" Yetto
>
> Apparently Julie Faramis doesn't recognize you, and doesn't realize that
> the post in question is radically out of character.
What does your pontification have to do with colored lines in slrn, Bloch?
> Those of us who have read your posts for a while recognize the forgery
> immediately. We don't even need no stinkin' headers, as I already
> indicated in an earlier post.
What does your pontification have to do with colored lines in slrn, Bloch?
notbob
Need more info:
What are you opening slrn in? tty? xterm? What desktop? Gnome?
KDE? All have different settings relative to how slrn displays it's
colors. Have you looked at your .slrnrc file for color display terminal
and non-color display term settings. Desktop color settings? Default
debian color setttings? What color schema on the terms and x-terms?
All these are relative.
nb
Julie Faramis
> Mike Yetto<mye...@nycap.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Julie Faramis<j.fara...@qmail.net> writes and having writ moves on.
>>> What does your question have to do with colored lines in slrn, Yetto?
>>
>> Are you a sock-puppet, another fan-boi or incapable of
>> recognizing a poorly forged troll post?
>
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with colored lines in slrn, Wader?
> It's utterly boring, not worth playing with;
> be prepared for many iterations of it. HTH
Who is "it", Wader? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
>> Mike "not that it matters" Yetto
>
> Absolutely not.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with colored lines in slrn, Wader?
Mike Yetto
>On 25/03/2011 2:18 PM, Gene E. Bloch wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:01:06 -0400, Mike Yetto wrote:
>>
>>> Julie Faramis<j.fara...@qmail.net> writes and having writ moves on.
>>>> What does your question have to do with colored lines in slrn, Yetto?
>>>
>>> Are you a sock-puppet, another fan-boi or incapable of
>>> recognizing a poorly forged troll post?
>>>
>>> Mike "not that it matters" Yetto
>>
>> Apparently Julie Faramis doesn't recognize you, and doesn't realize that
>> the post in question is radically out of character.
>What does your pontification have to do with colored lines in slrn, Bloch?
>> Those of us who have read your posts for a while recognize the forgery
>> immediately. We don't even need no stinkin' headers, as I already
>> indicated in an earlier post.
>What does your pontification have to do with colored lines in slrn, Bloch?
Welcome back, Mrs. Danforth.
Mike "or is it Mr. Freely?" Yetto
Julie Faramis
> Julie Faramis<j.fara...@qmail.net> writes and having writ moves on.
>>> Those of us who have read your posts for a while recognize the forgery
>>> immediately. We don't even need no stinkin' headers, as I already
>>> indicated in an earlier post.
>
>> What does your pontification have to do with colored lines in slrn, Bloch?
>
> Welcome back, Mrs. Danforth.
Who is "Mrs. Danforth"? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias. My name is Faramis. Suffering from reading comprehension
problems, Yetto?
> Mike "or is it Mr. Freely?" Yetto
What does your question have to do with colored lines in slrn, Yetto?
Gene E. Bloch
> Julie Faramis <j.fara...@qmail.net> writes and having writ moves on.
>>On 25/03/2011 2:18 PM, Gene E. Bloch wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:01:06 -0400, Mike Yetto wrote:
>>>
>>>> Julie Faramis<j.fara...@qmail.net> writes and having writ moves on.
>>>>> What does your question have to do with colored lines in slrn, Yetto?
>>>>
>>>> Are you a sock-puppet, another fan-boi or incapable of
>>>> recognizing a poorly forged troll post?
>>>>
>>>> Mike "not that it matters" Yetto
>>>
>>> Apparently Julie Faramis doesn't recognize you, and doesn't realize that
>>> the post in question is radically out of character.
>
>>What does your pontification have to do with colored lines in slrn, Bloch?
>
>>> Those of us who have read your posts for a while recognize the forgery
>>> immediately. We don't even need no stinkin' headers, as I already
>>> indicated in an earlier post.
>
>>What does your pontification have to do with colored lines in slrn, Bloch?
>
> Welcome back, Mrs. Danforth.
>
> Mike "or is it Mr. Freely?" Yetto
I have to say I was about to say something similar on reading the post
which you (and now I, indirectly) have replied to. You saved me the
trouble :-)
Gene "We don't need no stinkin' headers" Bloch
Julie Faramis
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:54:04 -0400, Mike Yetto wrote:
>> Julie Faramis<j.fara...@qmail.net> writes and having writ moves on.
>>
>> Welcome back, Mrs. Danforth.
>>
>> Mike "or is it Mr. Freely?" Yetto
>
> I have to say I was about to say something similar on reading the post
> which you (and now I, indirectly) have replied to. You saved me the
> trouble :-)
What does that have to do with colored lines in slrn, Bloch? And who are
"Mrs. Danforth" and "Mr. Freely", Bloch? There is nobody in this
newsgroup using either alias.
> Gene "We don't need no stinkin' headers" Bloch
What does the odor of your headers have to do with colored lines in
slrn, Bloch?
Indi
> Mike Yetto <mye...@nycap.invalid> wrote:
>
>> >What does your question have to do with colored lines in slrn, Yetto?
>>
>> Are you a sock-puppet, another fan-boi or incapable of
>> recognizing a poorly forged troll post?
>
> be prepared for many iterations of it. HTH
>
>
>
It's that tholen bot -- an incredibly boring troll.
I suspect at least some of its posts are generated by a
perl script -- or maybe it's just all thorazined out.
There's obviously something minimally alive behind it...
--
"...she kept arranging and rearranging the rabbit and kind of waving to it.
I decided, "this is the person I want to sit next to".
Julie Faramis
> On 2011-03-25, Wader Of Doom <w...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>> Mike Yetto <mye...@nycap.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Julie Faramis<j.fara...@qmail.net> writes and having writ moves on.
>>>> What does your question have to do with colored lines in slrn, Yetto?
>>>
>>> Are you a sock-puppet, another fan-boi or incapable of
>>> recognizing a poorly forged troll post?
>>
>> It's that dick who's been infesting afn, Mike.
>> It's utterly boring, not worth playing with;
>> be prepared for many iterations of it. HTH
What does Wader's classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with colored lines in slrn, Indi?
>>> Mike "not that it matters" Yetto
>>
>> Absolutely not.
>
> It's that tholen bot -- an incredibly boring troll.
Who is "that tholen bot", Indi? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias.
> I suspect at least some of its posts are generated by a
> perl script -- or maybe it's just all thorazined out.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
> There's obviously something minimally alive behind it...
What does your pontification have to do with colored lines in slrn, Indi?
Gene E. Bloch
> On 2011-03-25, Wader Of Doom <w...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>> Mike Yetto <mye...@nycap.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Julie Faramis <j.fara...@qmail.net> writes and having writ moves on.
>>> >What does your question have to do with colored lines in slrn, Yetto?
>>>
>>> Are you a sock-puppet, another fan-boi or incapable of
>>> recognizing a poorly forged troll post?
>>
>> It's that dick who's been infesting afn, Mike.
>> It's utterly boring, not worth playing with;
>> be prepared for many iterations of it. HTH
>>
>>> Mike "not that it matters" Yetto
>>
>> Absolutely not.
>>
>
> It's that tholen bot -- an incredibly boring troll.
> I suspect at least some of its posts are generated by a
> perl script -- or maybe it's just all thorazined out.
> There's obviously something minimally alive behind it...
One program I listened to today interviewed an author who wrote about
the Turing Test. It was, IIRC, Whad'Ya Know, http://www.notmuch.com, but
I can't find today's show there, so I can't verify it.
Anyway, Hieronymus or whoever is almost passing the test :-)
Julie Faramis
> One program I listened to today interviewed an author who wrote about
> the Turing Test. It was, IIRC, Whad'Ya Know, http://www.notmuch.com, but
> I can't find today's show there, so I can't verify it.
What does that have to do with newsreader software, Bloch?
> Anyway, Hieronymus or whoever is almost passing the test :-)
Who is "Hieronymus or whoever", Bloch? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.