Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

(gravity) sig font and color issue

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Erroneous Maximus

unread,
Jul 1, 2009, 4:29:05 PM7/1/09
to

Where can I request a fix to this feature? I like graviry too much to
call it an error, so I'll take M$ que and call it a feature.

Tom B.

unread,
Jul 2, 2009, 9:08:30 AM7/2/09
to
Erroneous Maximus <err...@dodgit.com> wrote ...

>
> Where can I request a fix to this feature? I like graviry too much to
> call it an error, so I'll take M$ que and call it a feature.

Here in nsr - or you can report and discuss stuff like this on the
phpBBoard at SourceForge. I have a link to it on the home page (see
my sig ironically)

There is a topic about this in Bugs and Open Discussion. Feel free
to make some noise about it. It does trigger falsely occasionally
(I think usually with UTF-8 8-bit) so I will go ahead and put it in
the bug tracker.

Care to elaborate what you ideally would like it to do?

--
Tom B. * * * Gravity Web Pages * * *
http://mpgravity.sourceforge.net/
http://gravity.tbates.org/
http://lightning.prohosting.com/~tbates/gravity/

Erroneous Maximus

unread,
Jul 2, 2009, 3:24:36 PM7/2/09
to
In article <MPG.24b67b594...@news.individual.net>, nfn03862
@naples.net says...

>
> Erroneous Maximus <err...@dodgit.com> wrote ...
>
> >
> > Where can I request a fix to this feature? I like graviry too much to
> > call it an error, so I'll take M$ que and call it a feature.
>
> Here in nsr - or you can report and discuss stuff like this on the
> phpBBoard at SourceForge. I have a link to it on the home page (see
> my sig ironically)
>
> There is a topic about this in Bugs and Open Discussion. Feel free
> to make some noise about it. It does trigger falsely occasionally
> (I think usually with UTF-8 8-bit) so I will go ahead and put it in
> the bug tracker.
>
> Care to elaborate what you ideally would like it to do?

Sorry for short changing you on what I would like to see in the sig
font and color glitch. As in days of old have the sig reflect the
size and color of the body...

frag

unread,
Jul 2, 2009, 4:29:31 PM7/2/09
to
err...@dodgit.com took a blunt brush and painted...

>
> Sorry for short changing you on what I would like to see in the sig
> font and color glitch. As in days of old have the sig reflect the
> size and color of the body...

You want the sig to say:
"This post is 72 lines long, 23% of it is black and 78% of it is mauve."
?


--
frag

(deliberate mathematical typo to see who's awake out there)

Yo$$1960

unread,
Jul 2, 2009, 4:41:22 PM7/2/09
to
frag wrote:

> (deliberate mathematical typo to see who's awake out there)

Oooh! Me! 101% indeed.

--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad never immediately apparent"

Where will you be when the bodies burn?
The Gasman Cometh - Crass

Erroneous Maximus

unread,
Jul 3, 2009, 3:47:20 PM7/3/09
to
In article <MPG.24b729015e0b1a3598968c@server>, ne...@ukrm.co.uk
says...

>
> err...@dodgit.com took a blunt brush and painted...
> >
> > Sorry for short changing you on what I would like to see in the sig
> > font and color glitch. As in days of old have the sig reflect the
> > size and color of the body...
>
> You want the sig to say:
> "This post is 72 lines long, 23% of it is black and 78% of it is mauve."
> ?

Let's try this one more time: How about the same font, font size and
color as the message. Sorry I can't make this any clearer for the
smart asses in the peanut gallery.

Tom B.

unread,
Jul 3, 2009, 4:02:58 PM7/3/09
to
Erroneous Maximus <err...@dodgit.com> wrote ...

>

Uhhh - frag would be the one to program it, so you better be nice!
Anyway, I put it in the tracker (no promises when - other stuff
goin on). I doubt it will go back to text same as body - *maybe*
user configurable.

Erroneous Maximus

unread,
Jul 3, 2009, 10:42:31 PM7/3/09
to
In article <MPG.24b82dfe...@news.individual.net>, nfn03862
@naples.net says...

>
> Erroneous Maximus <err...@dodgit.com> wrote ...
>
> >
> > In article <MPG.24b729015e0b1a3598968c@server>, ne...@ukrm.co.uk
> > says...
> > >
> > > err...@dodgit.com took a blunt brush and painted...
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for short changing you on what I would like to see in the sig
> > > > font and color glitch. As in days of old have the sig reflect the
> > > > size and color of the body...
> > >
> > > You want the sig to say:
> > > "This post is 72 lines long, 23% of it is black and 78% of it is mauve."
> > > ?
> >
> > Let's try this one more time: How about the same font, font size and
> > color as the message. Sorry I can't make this any clearer for the
> > smart asses in the peanut gallery.
>
> Uhhh - frag would be the one to program it, so you better be nice!
> Anyway, I put it in the tracker (no promises when - other stuff
> goin on). I doubt it will go back to text same as body - *maybe*
> user configurable.

smart ass comment respectfully withdrawn, and user config would be a
winner.

frag

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 6:17:51 PM7/4/09
to
yoss...@eternal-september.org took a blunt brush and painted...

>
> frag wrote:
>
> > (deliberate mathematical typo to see who's awake out there)
>
> Oooh! Me! 101% indeed.

Yay! Well done, have a banana :)

--
frag

frag

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 6:21:51 PM7/4/09
to
err...@dodgit.com took a blunt brush and painted...
> In article <MPG.24b82dfe...@news.individual.net>, nfn03862
> @naples.net says...
> > Erroneous Maximus <err...@dodgit.com> wrote ...
> > >
> > > Let's try this one more time: How about the same font, font size and
> > > color as the message. Sorry I can't make this any clearer for the
> > > smart asses in the peanut gallery.
> >
> > Uhhh - frag would be the one to program it, so you better be nice!
> > Anyway, I put it in the tracker (no promises when - other stuff
> > goin on). I doubt it will go back to text same as body - *maybe*
> > user configurable.
>
> smart ass comment respectfully withdrawn, and user config would be a
> winner.

Heh, no problem.

The sole reason I made it a small font & light grey is the newsgroups I
frequent have lots of sigs, not overly long sigs, but I know nearly all the
people there so the sigs hold zero interest to me.

As Tom says, next on the agenda is doing UTF-8/16 properly which will bring
Gravity bang upto date.

After that its little things such as this.


--
frag

_...@jeff_relf.seattle.invalid

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 12:22:19 AM7/5/09
to
Speaking of “ doing UTF-8/16 properly ”, as you(Frag), put it...

The “Arial Unicode MS” font has printable graphemes(letters) for
every script(alphabet) in the world ― but it's not monoSpaced per se.

Making all graphemes(all languages) equally monoSpaced, as I do,
means I can create plain-text tables without nasty HTML.

Korean and Chinese are double-wide monoSpaced (vs an ASCII letter),
Some Indic(Hindi) ligatures are quintuple-wide.

I use a binary search to locate the cache of a nonASCII grapheme,
which means I have to know how many glyphs are in the ligature
before I can do the search.

As it stands now, I've simply hard-coded in certain known ligatures,
because I couldn't find a better way to do it, at least not yet.

screenShots of equally monoSpaced graphemes:
www.JeffRelf.F-M.FM/Bidi.PNG
www.JeffRelf.F-M.FM/UTF-8.PNG
――――――――――――――――――
Although Chinese once had a “proper” alphabet,
it was long-ago combined into ligatures, and morphed,
so that they no longer resemble their former selves.

The ampersand(&) is a morphed ligature, for example.
Originally, it was the latin word “et”, meaning “and”.
――――――――――――――――――
My newsReader recognizes/kills 10+ diffent kinds of sigs,
e.g. the many nonStandard ones employed by Google Groups users.

Yo$$1960

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 1:34:06 PM7/5/09
to
frag wrote:

> Yay! Well done, have a banana :)

Thx, but I don't bananas. Got any apples instead?

Yeah, I know; I'm an ingrate. :-)

--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad never immediately apparent"

Black man got a lot of problems, but he don't mind throwing a brick
White Riot - The Clash

Erroneous Maximus

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 5:47:39 PM7/5/09
to
In article <MPG.24b9e657bb0d82f989691@server>, ne...@ukrm.co.uk
says...

I will patiently await you wizardry and your update notices.

_...@jeff_relf.seattle.invalid

unread,
Jul 6, 2009, 10:51:23 AM7/6/09
to
I no longer have to hard-code-in the diaCritics I need.
Discovering DiaCritics is simple Windows.H stuff, like this:

if ( !surrogatePair && CH[1] >= 0x300 ) { ushort B[ mxCH ];
// Here, the second glyph could be a Diacritic.
GetStringTypeW( CT_CTYPE3, CH, mxCH, B );
if ( *B == C3_ALPHA ) { ushort *Prop = B ;
// Count diaCritics, for the binary search of cached graphemes.
Loop( mxCH - 1 ) {
if ( !*++Prop || *Prop > 7 ) break ; szGraph++ ; } } }

See:
www.JeffRelf.F-M.FM/X.CPP
www.JeffRelf.F-M.FM/X.ZIP
www.JeffRelf.F-M.FM/X.EXE
www.JeffRelf.F-M.FM/X.TXT

frag

unread,
Jul 7, 2009, 9:19:15 PM7/7/09
to
Erroneous Maximus wibbled...

Damn, who told you my name is Rincewind?

--
frag
Kawasaki ZX9R, Kawasaki ZX10R
BOTAFOT#6 exKoTBOTAFOTL BOD#7 MKA&E#1 (Oak Leaf Cluster) UKRMHRC#11
DS#5 UK-R-M FAQ : http://www.ukrm.info DFV#3

frag

unread,
Jul 7, 2009, 9:18:25 PM7/7/09
to
Yo$$1960 wibbled...

>
> frag wrote:
>
> > Yay! Well done, have a banana :)
>
> Thx, but I don't bananas. Got any apples instead?
>
> Yeah, I know; I'm an ingrate. :-)

Apples? I can probably knock a virtual one up in VMWare.

0 new messages