> On 4 Dec 2009 01:43:11 GMT, DonnaB wrote:
>
>> My newsgroup provider (Newsguy.com) is offering ...
>
> I can't believe a once respected newsgroup provider is spamming
> newsgroups to solicit new accounts. This is the second post that
> I've seen in the same group.
>
[...]
>
> Emailed also to sup...@newsguy.com, and crossposted.
X-post snuffed with this post.
I can't for the life of me fathom *why* you x-posted this into NSR?
I had to go to GG to find the original, which you'd not quoted,
perhaps you should've, it wasn't such bad spam at all.
<http://groups.google.com/group/rec.food.cooking/browse_thread/thread/e4d6470c93ea8816/87690aafc03326a1?hl=en&q=#87690aafc03326a1>
I don't pay for usenet access cause I'm not too interested in
binaries, but I didn't find the OP's post offensive either, in
fact I thought was OK info for anyone who wants that kind of service.
One of our most respected usenet gurus (Luu Tran) promotes the same
product on his website (get a month free at Newsguy link at the top
of his page). I see little difference in the OP's seemingly one-off
post, to Luu's ad link which has been visible for much longer.
So your X-post into here has left me wondering, WTF? Why couldn't you
just KF it instead of x-posting and ranting about it?
Take it easy.
--
dee
> Are you some sort of Spam sympathizer? Your acceptance of such
> posts is truly bewildering.
So why did you x-post it into here?
--
dee
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:16:13 +0000 (UTC), Mike Dee wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4 Dec 2009 01:43:11 GMT, DonnaB wrote:
>>>
>>>> My newsgroup provider (Newsguy.com) is offering ...
>>>
>>> I can't believe a once respected newsgroup provider is spamming
>>> newsgroups to solicit new accounts. This is the second post
>>> that I've seen in the same group.
>>>
>> [...]
>>>
>>> Emailed also to sup...@newsguy.com, and crossposted.
>>
>> X-post snuffed with this post.
>>
>> I can't for the life of me fathom *why* you x-posted this into
>> NSR?
>
> For bad publicity. Duh.
You got the "Duh" bit right.
>> I had to go to GG to find the original, which you'd not quoted,
>
> Yeah - I'm in the habit of quoting SPAM.
>
>> perhaps you should've, it wasn't such bad spam at all.
>> <http://groups.google.com/group/rec.food.cooking/browse_thread/thread/e4d6470c93ea8816/87690aafc03326a1?hl=en&q=#87690aafc03326a1>
[...]
> Dude, it's 100% spam. Get with it.
Dufuss. I don't give a shit. It wasn't posted into here until *you*
x-posted into here.
> And it's from a News provider, no less. It has no business in the
> groups to which it was originally posted.
Groups(s)? only one until *you* x-posted a response to it.
>> One of our most respected usenet gurus (Luu Tran) promotes the
>> same product on his website (get a month free at Newsguy link at
>> the top of his page). I see little difference in the OP's
>> seemingly one-off post, to Luu's ad link which has been visible
>> for much longer.
>
> It's not a one-off post, and it's spam. I didn't think you were a
> moron until now.
>
> Are you some sort of Spam sympathizer? Your acceptance of such
> posts is truly bewildering.
Expanding on my previous post:
No, I'm *not* a SPAM sympathizer. I'm anti X-posts. Furthermore:
X-posts delivered as a *followUp-To* Spam that *wasn't* x-posted
anywhere to begin with, are IMHO 10000+ times worse than the SPAM
that got sent to where-ever it ever got sent to.
a). said SPAM was *not* x-posted *anywhere* other than some NG that
*you* read!!!
And *especially* ...
b). The SPAMer did *not* post it into *here*!!!!! _you did_
Perhaps y**r * f**kw*t wh* d*sn*t kn*w h*w t* s*t k*ll f*l*s?
--
dee
> Perhaps y**r * f**kw*t wh* d*sn*t kn*w h*w t* s*t k*ll f*l*s?
Gad!
Even when I try to obfuscate - I still make spelling mistakes :-(
Should be:
Perhaps y** *r* * f**kw*t wh* d*sn*t kn*w h*w t* s*t k*ll f*l*s?
Aw, drop the "Perhaps" and "?" bit.
--
dee
>> Aw, drop the "Perhaps" and "?" bit.
>
> This sheds a whole new light on you.
>
> You're as crazy as that Mike Dee guy.
Hey! I'm pretty sure I'm way crazier than that Mike Dee guy! ;-)
--
dee