In article <1989Oct16.115545.12...@agate.berkeley.edu> gsm...@garnet.berkeley.edu (Gene W. Smith) writes:
You can tell when a USENET discussion is getting old when one of
> People voted for Hitler as Chancellor too. A vote is not to
the participents drags out Hitler and the Nazis.
>>You can't kill snails.Alright, You can't kill *all* the snails.
> I've killed snails. I've even fed them to my duck.
>What follows is a scientific discussion of sorts.Oh. Objective.
>It is more or less research,Oh. Objective.
>though not exactly earth-shaking:Yeah, it's *just fish*. Subjective.
>the conclusionsNo, thats a given. The point is this this information has been around
>drawn are of the sort "Wow! Plants produce oxygen, just like They
for a ong time (although CO2 injection to enhance aquaric plant growth
is new, even though is discovered to be the limiting factor by
Scheel in '66) but *nobody has ever quantified it*.
``Which curve should I use for this animation here ? I have
``Uh, dunno. we don't really know, they're all about the same. Bezier
It's *just math*.
>The general level is about that of a high school scienceI for one would be delighted if sci.bio was elevated to the
high school level.
> Needless to say, this posting is not typical of the "what can IYou must see a different majority than I do.
>do to keep my guppies alive?" stuff which makes up the majority
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.