Cabal Manifesto on global domination, virtual terrorism and sabotage
Bloxy's
>(Jason Crowell) wrote:
>>In article <844l3p$m23$2...@nntp1.atl.mindspring.net>, Bloxy's...@hotmail.com
>> (Bloxy's) wrote:
Cabal is a paramilitary organization,
conducting the clandestine operations of virtual terrorism
and sabotage of global information streams, using techniques
of black mail, lies, deception, perversion and fabrications.
========================== quote begin ==========================
>>They reserve the "right" to do ANYTHING THEY please.
>>The very fact that they have a notion of TINC (There Is No
>>Cabal) simply PROVES that there Is Cabal.
>If there was no Cabal, then people would imagine that it exists (using your
>own philosophy of being unable to prove non-existence), so we may as well act
>like there is a Cabal. But the Cabal is usually exaggerated so far beyond
>realism that it's net.comedy, however someone always takes the jokes as the
>Truth.
>>Followin web page belongs to them:
>>Clicking on the picture takes you to:
>>http://www.cabal.net/index2.html
>>--Cabal Network Security--
>>Interesting issue is the very fact they use the word Securtity,
>>which is enough reason to believe they operate in cooperation
>>with intelligence, military and government agencies.
>This is beyond weird, if it were this secret organization, would they be
>advertising their existence? Or posting frothing silliness from their secret
>work addresses?
Hahahahahaha.
Are you a plain "clueless"?
How about these:
Look at that symbol of the USSR with a scull inside it.
Don't forget to look at the running "Surrender Stupid"
at the bottom of the page.
This is their "mission" as outlined on http://www.lart.com/
---------------------------- quote begin -------------------------
"To Serve And Reject"
EQUALIZER TO THE MASSES
Yes, now too with YOUR WILL user unfriendliness shall cease to exist!!!
DON'T TREAD ON THEE
"...it is the responsibility of anyone with a modem and a dialup
account...promptly to SPANK,
manhandle and humiliate they who do, write, drool and encourage things
ill on the Internet."
..if you can't take a joke, we'll make your butt smoke!
---------------------------- end of quote -------------------------
>>>Organization: TINC -- LLTC
SPUTUM:
http://www.sputum.com/suitsite/antispam.html
http://www.sputum.com/suitsite/sputfaq.html
---------------------------- quote begin -------------------------
Q: Tactical: Does this mean that S.P.U.T.U.M.
doesn't plan and think strategically or operationally?
A: Dream on, Pinkboy. A select few of our colleagues have
read our formerly classified Treatise:
---------------------------- end of quote -------------------------
---------------------------- quote begin -------------------------
The S.P.U.T.U.M. Net.War Operational Taskforce Working
Advisory Document.
http://www.radix.net/~revjack/snotwad/snotwad0.htm
http://www.radix.net/~revjack/snotwad/snotwad2.htm
Net.War Planning: The End is the Beginning
In order to assess how to conduct war against an opponent, one must
first firmly visualize the peace you want after the din of fighting
has ceased. Our goal in all conflicts is always to win, and win BIG.
However, our definition of WINNING BIG will determine, not only our
behavior during periods of relatively minor conflict (a.k.a. peace),
but our responses to perceived hostile intentions by our adversaries
(pre-hostilities behavior), our strategy and tactics during actual
conflict, and our approach to conflict resolution at the termination
of active altercation. In other words, the end state must be placed
at the beginning of one's plans, else all efforts during the
pre-hostilities, hostilities, and war termination phases will be as
disjointed as the Scarecrow in the Wizard of Oz-- who, of course,
sorely lacked a brain.
What sort of peace do we envision at the end of a net.war? In general,
we all want at least the status quo ante-- the situation before the
spammer/hacker/mailbomber affected our net.lives. But is that all we
want?
Depending on the nature and extent of damage inflicted by our
opponent's offensive incursion into our lives, we may wish to
see him or her:
* publicly identified, up to and including home phone number and
favorite sex toy
* humiliated, especially when done publicly so as
to serve as an example (deterrent) to others
* kicked off of his or her internet access
* drawn, quartered, hanged, sliced, diced and julienne fried.
---------------------------- end of quote -------------------------
---------------------------- quote begin -------------------------
Preface: W*r is Not a Four Letter Word
by
Unit 0 (Control), Atu 0 (The Fool), Directress, SubGenius Police,
Usenet Tactical Unit (Mobile)
Official FAQ Promulgator, alt.binaries.slack
Defender of the Faithless in these Latter Daze of the CONdom
"Without preparedness superiority is not real superiority, and there
can be no initiative either.
Having grasped this point, a force which is inferior but prepared can
often defeat a superior enemy by surprise attack."
-- Mao Tse-Tung, "On Protracted War", (May, 1938), Selected Works,
Vol. II, pp 165-166.
---------------------------- end of quote -------------------------
---------------------------- quote begin -------------------------
http://www.radix.net/~revjack/snotwad/snotwad4.htm
Operational Net.War Analysis: Center of Gravity Analysis
"Therefore once more: War is an instrument of policy; it must
necessarily bear its character, it must measure with its scale:
the conduct of war, in its great features, is therefore policy
itself, which takes up the sword instead of the pen, but does
not on that account cease to think according to its own laws."
--Carl von Clausewitz, Vom Kriege: On War, Book 5, Chapter VI
---------------------------- end of quote -------------------------
---------------------------- quote begin -------------------------
http://www.radix.net/~revjack/snotwad/snotwad5.htm
Tactical COA Analysis: Course of Action Analysis for the
year 3000
"Now the crux of military operations lies in the pretense of
accommodating one's self to the designs of the enemy."
--Sun Tzu, Art of War, XI: 56
[...]
Military:
There are seven archetypal missions that may be assigned to military
forces:
* Presence: 3-space-- Stationing troops overseas/ Net.War--
making manifest oneself as anti-Spammer to Usenet, Web
* Show of Force: 3-space-- Rapid deployment of forces somewhere
OTHER than FEBA (forward edge of battle area) [e.g., former
yearly REFORGER operations to demonstrate U.S. capability to
deploy and sustain reinforcements to NATO theater of
operations]/Net.War-- spam cancellation campaign, spam customer
education campaign (e.g., http://www.cauce.org).
* Demonstration: 3-space-- China launching missiles very near
Taiwan with intent to threaten/Net.War--taking down a rogue
NNTP server to show that it can be done, S.P.(U.T.U.)M.
Distributed Enlow Parody Site
* Special Ops (including PsyOps, Unconventional Warfare, Civil
Affairs, Maskirovka, Active Counter-Intel)--3-space-- Seal Team
infiltration into hostage situation / Net.War-- infiltration of our
S.P.(U.T.U.)M. operative into Enlow's organization in the spring of
1997
*Quarantine: 3-space-- Arms embargo in Bosnia, Oil export embargo
in Iraqi theater of operations/Net.War-- killfile campaign against
spammer
* Blockade: 3-space-- British blockade of Germany in WWII/Net.War
-- Shunning of AGIS/UDP/retroadministration of rogue domain traffic
* Forced Entry: 3-space-- Air war (Desert Storm, part 1), Marine
amphibious assault (Iwo Jima), infantry invasion (Operation Overlord,
6 June 1944)/Net.War-- actual hacking of enemy websites/mailbombing/server
takedown for the purposes of D.O.S., physical destruction of spamming
equipment [none of these latter examples is recommended, let alone legal].
* Economic: 3-space-- freezing assets, MFN status, withholding of NGO
(non-governmental organization) support via military ops/Net.War--
organizing customer boycott of rogue ISP/Spammer business, lawsuits
to tie up spammer assets
* Information: 3-space-- reconnaissance/recon by
fire/intel/counter-intel/counter-counter-intel/disinformation
campaigns/Net.War-- extreme awareness of OPSEC (operations security)
-- minimizing signature open to traffic analysis, minimizing tell-tale
connections between 3-space life and net.life (don't advertise on
rec.hiking that you are going on vacation next week if you are a
major anti-Spammer);
* COMSEC (communications security)-- frequent, nay, constant use
of secure comm channels, strong encryption, and counter-intel
measures (active and passive); and INFOSEC (information security)
--redundant, secure backups of useful IRC logs, Usenet threads
[DejaNews headers do NOT include paths], e-mail traffic; avoidance
of keeping sensitive infowar files at work where employer can find
them; avoidance of keeping unencrypted text file on computer with
names of associates [bugs in browsers can allow files on your
computer to be read remotely]).
---------------------------- end of quote -------------------------
---------------------------- quote begin -------------------------
Credits:
The members of the S.P.(U.T.U.)M. Net.War Operational Taskforce;
also, Units 0, IV, V, VII, VIII, XV, XIX, XXI, XXVIII, XXXI, LII,
LV, LXI, LXIV, LXXX, LXXXVII, and XCI for their
commentary/critique/logistical support (great pizza, LXXX!);
the National Military Colleges and Institutions of Higher Military
Education of Britain, Germany, Canada, Mexico, Japan, Brazil,
Israel, Russia, and the United States, for their professional
reviews of the art of War.
---------------------------- end of quote -------------------------
http://www.radix.net/~revjack/snotwad/snotwad9.htm
CASE ANALYSIS: Mike Enlow and S.P.(U.T.U.)M.'s Operation
"Cry Havoc"
[S.N.O.T. analysis classified; left as exercise]
---------------------------- quote begin -------------------------
http://www.radix.net/~revjack/snotwad/snotwada.htm
CASE ANALYSIS: The "Literary Bomber" and the Joint
S.P.(U.T.U.)M./Cabal (TINC) Response
[C/TINC analysis classified; left as exercise]
---------------------------- end of quote -------------------------
Also review http://www.subgenius.com/ and their catalog.
See if you can find connections.
========================== end of quote ==========================
Bloxy's
>On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 05:25:26 GMT, Bloxy's...@hotmail.com (Bloxy's) wrote,
>in news.admin.net-abuse.usenet:
>
>}Cabal is a ****military organization,
>}conducting the clandes**** operations of virtual terrorism
>}and sabotage of global infor****** streams, using ****niques
>}of black mail, lies, **ception, perversion and fabri***ions.
>
>"All of art is lies. All of it." -- Lies, SubGenius artist.
First of all, why did you put '*' characters into most significant
words. What seems to be the problems for the powers of YOUR grade?
WHAT are you afraid of, sire?
Did YOU post this picture?
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.slack
From: Unit 18 <Uni...@SPUTSOUTH.com>
Subject: LeMur, here's that pic of German rangers you asked for . . .
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 12:13:37 -0500
Organization: SubGenius Police, Usenet Tactical Unit (Mobile), AKA
S.P.(U.T.U.)M.
. . . Rump Rangers, that is!
That pretty much answers who you are, isn't it?
Well, here is the original:
Cabal is a paramilitary organization,
conducting the clandestine operations of virtual terrorism
and sabotage of global information streams, using techniques
of black mail, lies, deception, perversion and fabrications.
You see how it works?
Please provide the list of network providers and the other
organizations and entities, whose facilities you use to conduct
your operations.
I asked you several times already. You are on notice.
Bloxy's
>On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 05:25:26 GMT, Bloxy's...@hotmail.com (Bloxy's) wrote,
>in news.admin.net-abuse.usenet:
>
>}Cabal is a ****military organization,
>}conducting the clandes**** operations of virtual terrorism
>}and sabotage of global infor****** streams, using ****niques
>}of black mail, lies, **ception, perversion and fabri***ions.
>
>"All of art is lies. All of it." -- Lies, SubGenius artist.
How about this one?
Did you post it?
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.slack
From: Unit 18 <Uni...@SPUTSOUTH.com>
Subject: LeMur, here's that pic of German rangers you asked for . . .
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 12:13:37 -0500
Organization: SubGenius Police, Usenet Tactical Unit (Mobile), AKA
S.P.(U.T.U.)M.
. . . Rump Rangers, that is!
So, what kind of "organization" are you?
You seem to know no limit, do you?
One more time: Please provide the names of ISP providers,
network carriers, or other organizations, whose facilities
you use to carry out your activity on the internet,
such as UDP.
Are you associated with any intelligence, military,
government or ANY other organizations in your activities
on the internet, and specifically newsgroups?
Bloxy's
>On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 08:49:16 GMT, Bloxy's...@hotmail.com (Bloxy's) wrote,
>in news.admin.net-abuse.usenet:
>
>}In article <a68e6s4h2dj63uhvq...@4ax.com>, un...@sputum.com
> wrote:
>}>On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 05:25:26 GMT, Bloxy's...@hotmail.com (Bloxy's) wrote,
>}>in news.admin.net-abuse.usenet:
>}>
>}>}Cabal is a ****military organization,
>}>}conducting the clandes**** operations of virtual terrorism
>}>}and sabotage of global infor****** streams, using ****niques
>}>}of black mail, lies, **ception, perversion and fabri***ions.
>}>
>}>"All of art is lies. All of it." -- Lies, SubGenius artist.
>}
>}words. What seems to be the problems for the powers of YOUR grade?
>}WHAT are you afraid of, sire?
>
>
>}Did YOU post this picture?
>}
>}From: Unit 18 <Uni...@SPUTSOUTH.com>
>}Subject: LeMur, here's that pic of German rangers you asked for . . .
>}Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 12:13:37 -0500
>}Organization: SubGenius Police, Usenet Tactical Unit (Mobile), AKA
>}S.P.(U.T.U.)M.
>}
>}
>}. . . Rump Rangers, that is!
>}
>
>
>}That pretty much answers who you are, isn't it?
>
>wouldn't be any fun. Especially since I'm married to Unit 180.
>
>}Well, here is the original:
>
>disappear.
>
>While you're digging into SubSite and dragging out all the SubGenius
>stuff, look for Doktor DynaSoar. That's me.
>
>}you are on notice.
>
>No, I'm on alert.
Hey, now you are talking.
Do you also spoof?
Now, let us consider this quote by your god Bob Dobbs.
http://members.aol.com/alhidell/paranoia/22Article.htm
------------------------ quote begin ------------------------
"To use the images of the city is not appropriate to our time.
The real city today is Magnetic City. Magnetic City is the whole
world in a little acoustic imitation of resonating electromagnetic
white light. We?re all on that little node. It can?t be visualized,
but the whole world is on that spot all the time, and that?s the
state of being discarnate. To someone who wants to have visual
parameters, that?s a very claustrophobic thing to imagine. But we
are stuck in that. That?s why people are channeling. That?s why
people are doing all the various things that have been surprising
to Americans for the past twenty years. They?re trying to erase
their body, and the motive for that is the sensory-structural
change resulting from electric conditions.
Did you know that even speaking, even not being in a trance,
is a form of trance under electric conditions? Just walking
around is a form of trance today because any bodily activity
is inside this little electronic, discarnate node of
consciousness called Magnetic City."
Bob Dobbs (Dave Porter Interview 10/16/88)
[...]
Send mail to alhi...@aol.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 1999 Paranoia: The Conspiracy Reader
Last modified: December 14, 1999
------------------------ quote begin ------------------------
That whole page seems to be full of it.
So, can you tell me what kind of cult you are in?
Can you reduce your entire system to a paragraph or two?
Just keep in mind, you are talking to
Acharya Veeren,
Self Appointed Council of Osho
[destroyed by the evillest empires of all,
while trying to create a place where the
New Man can be born, and where ALL kinds of people can
enjoy life to the fullest, free from all guilt and fear,
creating new ways of living the life in joy
and doing their best to live in harmony with nature,
respecting ALL life.]
on the subjects of Arts and Sciences
Bloxy's
Bloxy's
>>}you are on notice.
Time to wake up indeed.
>Hey, now you are talking.
>Do you also spoof?
>Now, let us consider this quote by your god Bob Dobbs.
>http://members.aol.com/alhidell/paranoia/22Article.htm
------------------------ quote begin ------------------------
Bob Dobbs is an expert on communications theory and was a
colleague of Marshall McLuhan at the Center for Culture and
Technology in Toronto, Ontario. For several years during
the mid-?80s he was the personal advisor to investigative
journalist Bob Marshall, who hosted a radio show on CKLN-FM
called the International Connection. The show regularly
featured the information of groundbreaking conspiracy
theorists such as Mae Brussell, Sherman Skolnick,
Dr. Peter Beter, and Lyndon LaRouche?s Executive
Intelligence Review. Adam Vaughan, the manager of the
station, fired Marshall early in 1987 for broadcasting
Dr. Beter?s antiSemitic rants against the Rothschilds.
The fact that Beter railed against the Rockefellers just as
much as the Rothschilds apparently went right over Vaughan?s
head. Dobbs later replaced Marshall on the air, and has since
followed a rather interesting career trajectory. According to
him, he?s taken over the Earth.
Dobbs is a brilliant but eccentric fellow who claims to be the
leader of The Secret Council of Ten, a shadowy cabal that
controls the world using complicated techniques known as
synchronistic-linguistics and tetrad management. As far as I
know, the latter term was first developed by Marshall McLuhan
and his son Eric in their 1988 book Laws of Media: The New
Science. The tetrad is a four-step process that analyzes the
projected evolution of man-made artifacts; you might say it?s
a means of predicting the future of humanity by predicting
the future of its technology.
Dobbs claims the NSA and other intelligence organizations
utilize the techniques outlined in Laws of Media to manage
world affairs. He also claims that he and his colleagues are
engaged in the same exact activities. Thus, he refers to
himself as The Tetrad Manager.
------------------------ end of quote ------------------------
So, THAT is why you used the term Cabal.
I told you before and I am telling you again:
You are in disgrace as you abused one of the most ancient
systems of classification of life, known as Kabalah.
>Acharya Veeren,
>Self Appointed Council of Osho
>[destroyed by the evillest empires of all,
>while trying to create a place where the
>New Man can be born, and where ALL kinds of people can
>enjoy life to the fullest, free from all guilt and fear,
>creating new ways of living the life in joy
>and doing their best to live in harmony with nature,
>respecting ALL life.]
>on the subjects of Arts and Sciences
December 27, 1999
Bloxy's
>On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 10:37:43 GMT, Bloxy's...@hotmail.com (Bloxy's) wrote, in
>news.admin.net-abuse.usenet:
>
>
>>Now, let us consider this quote by your god Bob Dobbs.
>>
>>http://members.aol.com/alhidell/paranoia/22Article.htm
>>
>>------------------------ quote begin ------------------------
>
>
>>------------------------ quote begin ------------------------
>
> BWAHAHAHAHA!
>
> That Bob Dobbs is NOT the SubGenius "Bob" Dobbs. First of all,
> that Bob Dobbs can be interviewed. The SubG "Bob" Dobbs cannot.
> The SubG "Bob" is a piece of 50's clipart.
Yup. A TAMPLATE.
With a plastic smile.
And the dollar bills in his eyes.
Is that your leader?
> What you seems to have missed is that the Church of the SubGenius
> is a parody of parodies. I once called it "an anti-cult cult and
> an anti-religion religion", and our fearless leader thought it
> so appropriate that he appropriated it.
What kinda parody is it if you engage in global sabotage
and terrorism in virtual domain?
Was the UDP against India a parody?
>>That whole page seems to be full of it.
>>So, can you tell me what kind of cult you are in?
> Just did. But it has nothing to do with "That Page".
Uhu. Tell me about it.
>>Can you reduce your entire system to a paragraph or two?
> Who needs a paragraph. Can do it in one word: Slack.
Define slack.
> Course you need to know how to get Slack.
Slack is YOUR trip. Keep it.
> For you, I would
> suggest a visit to your doctor. Tell him are the things that
> are bothering you about the world. He can help.
Uhu. Did he help YOU?
>>Just keep in mind, you are talking to
>>Acharya Veeren,
>>Self Appointed Council of Osho
> Yes, I know. You were talking about it last February. A very
> sad event, I agree. You weren't there, by any chance?
Bloxy's
>On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 09:53:19 GMT, Unit 4 <Uni...@SPUTUM.com> wrote:
>
>[snippity]
Hey, Unit 18 is pretty high up there also.
I wonder if our Artificial Intelligenciacs will be able
to reconcile all this stuff.
Interesting material indeed.
>>}>"All of art is lies. All of it." -- Lies, SubGenius artist.
>>}
>>}First of all, why did you put '*' characters into most significant
>>}words. What seems to be the problems for the powers of YOUR grade?
>>}WHAT are you afraid of, sire?
>>
>>Nothing. I like to trigger you.
>
>BWAH! Some fux are *easy*, eh 4? Lemme borrow that stick for
>a minute . . .
>
>>}Did YOU post this picture?
>>}
>>}Newsgroups: alt.binaries.slack
>>}From: Unit 18 <Uni...@SPUTSOUTH.com>
>>}Subject: LeMur, here's that pic of German rangers you asked for . . .
>>}Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 12:13:37 -0500
>>}Organization: SubGenius Police, Usenet Tactical Unit (Mobile), AKA
>>}S.P.(U.T.U.)M.
>>}
>>}
>>}. . . Rump Rangers, that is!
>>}
>>
>>Nope, that was Unit 18, just like it says.
>>
>>}That pretty much answers who you are, isn't it?
>
>No, that was me, Blox. I posted that, I did. I fully confess.
>I did the "Preparation-N" pic too, just to poke some fun
>at NENSLO.
>
>Did the pic bother you somehow?
>
>Tough.
>
>>Unit 18? Hardly. I can't be everyone from Unit 0 to Unit 380. That
>>wouldn't be any fun. Especially since I'm married to Unit 180.
>
>I thought *I* married 180? Or was that Unit 24? 190?
>
>Fuggit, all those squishy brains feel the same when yer
>groping around in a dark decantment tank. Zero's is the
>only one I can tell from the others - it's LUMPY!
>
>>}Well, here is the original:
>>
>>The original was still one message back in the thread. It didn't
>>disappear.
>>
>>While you're digging into SubSite and dragging out all the SubGenius
>>stuff, look for Doktor DynaSoar. That's me.
>
>Didja point him to all the "Unit 4" pics that are liberally sprinkled
>all over Subsite and sputum.com? If not, I can at least post the
>ones *I've* done to a.b.s.
>
>Bloxy'd *shit* if he saw all the self-parodying stuff we've done
>over the years. Much better stuff than any of our critics ever
>came up with!
>
>>}you are on notice.
>>
>>No, I'm on alert.
>
>So . . . who's on first?
YOU tell me.
Bloxy's
>On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 23:05:09 GMT, Unit 4 <Uni...@SPUTUM.com> wrote:
>
>[snopperty]
>
>>Go ahead. Anyone else in ABS have any pics of me or SPUTUM, feel free to
>>have a repost fest. We lost a wing of the SPUTUM gallery anyway. Art
>>Terrorists. They coated all the pix with Winking Lizard sauce and ate
>>them.
>
>A small sampling posted to a.b.s. under Subject: S.P.U.T.U.M. SUX!
Note: a.b.s. = alt.binaries.slack
Newsgroups:
news.admin.net-abuse.misc,news.admin.net-abuse.usenet,
news.admin.censorship,alt.binaries.slack
Well, then repost more interesting stuff.
Bloxy's
>On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 10:37:43 GMT, Bloxy's...@hotmail.com (Bloxy's) wrote, in
>news.admin.net-abuse.usenet:
>
>}>On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 08:49:16 GMT, Bloxy's...@hotmail.com (Bloxy's) wrote,
>}>in news.admin.net-abuse.usenet:
>}
>}>}you are on notice.
>}>
>}>No, I'm on alert.
>}
>
>
>}Do you also spoof?
>
>Didn't you see the SNUTUM pages? We spoof anything, even ourselves.
>
>}Now, let us consider this quote by your god Bob Dobbs.
>}
>}http://members.aol.com/alhidell/paranoia/22Article.htm
>}
>}Bob Dobbs (Dave Porter Interview 10/16/88)
>}
>}[...]
>}
>}Send mail to alhi...@aol.com with questions or comments about this web site.
>}Copyright © 1999 Paranoia: The Conspiracy Reader
>}Last modified: December 14, 1999
>}
>}------------------------ quote begin ------------------------
>
>
>That's from the False Bob, a canadian who used the name Bob Dobbs, talked
>Negativland into helping him do a CD called "Bob's Media Ecology" (for
>which they later apologized) and hasn't done anything original except
>violate a trademark. What he didn't copy from us he copied from Marshall
>McLuhan.
>
>}That whole page seems to be full of it.
>
>
>}So, can you tell me what kind of cult you are in?
>
>
>}Can you reduce your entire system to a paragraph or two?
>
One dude says you can reduce to one word: slack.
YOU say - no way.
So, whose words is final, doktor DynaSoar?
>}Just keep in mind, you are talking to
>}
>}Acharya Veeren,
>}
>}Self Appointed Council of Osho
>So how long did you stay in Rajneeshville?
What is this hissing sound here?
Bloxy's
>On Tue, 28 Dec 1999 03:10:46 GMT, Bloxy's...@hotmail.com (Bloxy's) wrote, in
>news.admin.net-abuse.usenet:
>
>}In article <wMhnOIYQDL8fUb...@4ax.com>, The Righteous Order of
> Algiz, The Holy Valkyrjur, c/o J.R. "Bob" Dobbs wrote:
>}>On Mon, 27 Dec 1999 09:53:19 GMT, Unit 4 <Uni...@SPUTUM.com> wrote:
>}>
>}>[snippity]
>}
>}Hey, Unit 18 is pretty high up there also.
>
>
>}>>}you are on notice.
>}>>
>}>>No, I'm on alert.
>}>
>}
>}YOU tell me.
>
The same words you sang to death of Dough Mackall?
Exciting indeed.
So, what are the circumstances and the reason for his death?
http://howardk.moonfall.com/doug/wake.html
>Doug Mackall Virtual Wake
>Wednsday, November 18th 1999 00:00 GMT
>In memory of Doug Mackall - 1958-1999
>[04:14] <Unit180_4> Ellen's going to set us to 'away' and leave
> it running for logging.
>[04:14] So...
>[04:14] CHA CHA CHA, DOUG.
And WHO started that "virtual vake" meeting on IRC?
This dude here?
>[00:06] <howardk> Hi All. Welcome to the Doug Mackall virtual wake.
> The first part of
>[00:06] of the wake will be moderated (i.e. only people with +v
> privilege will
>[00:06] be able to speak. Once the +v people have had their say,
> then the
>[00:06] channel will be opened up for public chat.
PUBLIC chat?
Hahahahahahaha.
Ok, YOU remember these words REAL good now.
Bloxy's
Newsgroups:
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet,alt.slack.sputum,
alt.usenet.kooks,news.admin.net-abuse.email,
alt.spam,alt.current-events.net-abuse.spam,
free.hipcrime,rec.hipcrime
From: how...@primenet.com (Howard Knight)
Subject: Re: wXKD5pGP: POISONED newsgroups? Not Hardly.
Date: 28 Dec 1999 07:52:57 GMT
Organization: Nuke a Spammer for Doug Mackall
Is it YOUR picture here?
http://howardk.moonfall.com/scrotum/
or this one?
http://members.aol.com/sputart2/slack/ursula_major_unveiled.html
Looking good Howard Knight aka the master of disaster.
Zo, what is YER royal position in Cabal/SPUTUM/Subgenious
organization?
Kinda coverup man, running the "cancel" operations?
Hey, REALLY impressive.
In article <$-_$%__$%_-$%%_%$@news.noc.cabal.int>, how...@primenet.com
(Howard Knight) wrote:
>Spamster <uc...@ftc.gov> writes:
>
>: Score: HipCrime 2 Cabal 0
> ^^^^^
>You misspelled "Usenet". I know that you're mind is very limited,
Huh?
Zig bit, mine fuhrer!
> but try to understand this:
Uhu. Gonna suck like a black hole?
> Dippie's battle is not against the Cabal (TINC);
And how do YOU know, sire?
Are YOU from Cabal, by ANY humble chance?
>that is only a red herring. His only goal is to gain attention and
>notoriety for himself.
And how do YOU know?
Are you god?
Can you read someone else's intensions?
> That's it! LOL
Oh, oh, oh, oh.
And Cabal's insterests are what?
>
>Sorry. I hope I didn't make you feel stupid.
>Howard
Sucking as good, as a good ole black hole.
Howard, time to pack the bags.
Bloxy's
Cabal -> Usenet 2 -> "big 8" hierarchy on newsnet.
NICELY ties together it seems.
Now, for WHOSE interests?
General public?
Hahahahahahaha.
Tell me about it.
Well, looks like the following post belongs to this thread better:
------------------------- quote begin ----------------------------
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
From: falc...@best.com (Edward A. Falk)
Subject: Re: What is the story behind Hipcrime, from the beginning....
Date: 29 Dec 1999 10:37:17 GMT
Organization: a user of Best Internet Communications, Inc. www.best.com
In article <3869e45d$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com>, falc...@best.com (Edward A.
Falk) wrote:
>In article <386779DC...@ftc.gov>, Spamster <uc...@ftc.gov> wrote:
>>Thank you for your calm, rational, non-inflamitory reply. I don't
>>fully agree, only because the 'cabal' operate, for the most part,
>>in secrecy.
>The "cabal" such as it is, consists of the regular posters in this
>newsgroup. This is hardly operating in secrecy.
>As far as I know, the only "secret" operation ever done by
>anti-spammers was the recent UDP of VSNL. This was communicated
>to VSNL well in advance, so I'd hardly call that secret either.
>If you have reason to think otherwise, I would be curious as to
>what it is.
[Uhu. Tell me about it]
------------------------- end of quote ---------------------------
Now, to put things in perspective, here is a quote from:
http://www.rahul.net/falk/whatToDo.html
------------------------- quote begin ----------------------------
[...]
Ask Your System Administrators to Join Usenet 2
Usenet 2 is a new network comprised of sites that don't want spam
and are willing to cooperate towards this end. Usenet 2 sites
connect only with other Usenet 2 sites, and are connected to
the rest of usenet through special gateway systems that filter
out the spam as it comes in. The result is a full Usenet feed
without the spam.
Usenet 2 is still in the experimental stage, but the time is
ripe for you to ask your admins to join. More information on
Usenet 2 can be found at www.usenet2.org and Sol.net.
Ask your sys admins if they can move your site to Usenet 2.
Bring up the subject on your site's local newsgroups.
[...]
------------------------- end of quote ----------------------------
Now, recognize that Usenet 2 thing, TOTALLY controlled
at ALL levels of entire hierarchy, where Russ Allbery
is DA man, controlling the issues of general nature,
just like tale on "big 8" tree of corruption?
See how nicely it all ties in together?
So, how many steps does one need to take in order to see
the monstrocity of control, oppression, domination and
the very public interest ALL these "organizations"
claim to protect?