[mod] Re: No NANAS: posting daily summaries to NANAE
Larry Sheldon
> What is your opinion about posting *daily* spamtrap catch summaries here?
> [ two lines in post per tapped spam message ]
I mean no offense to Andrew and really don't disagree with his suggestion.
Except.
Except that I see it as another attempt to bandage up another buggy-whip
factory when the need for buggy-whips is gone (see also the SPAM-L code
blue efforts). (And isn't that a strange name--it was not the buggies
that got whipped.)
I've said before, and will join you in hoping I done say it again, that
"spam" is bigger than email (or "USENET", the forgotten half of NANAS).
The problem is similar regardless of medium (from email to
street-corners) and some the tactics against it are similar.
Isn't it time to unify the efforts against intrusive, abusive marketing?
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
of System Administrators:
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to
learn from their mistakes.
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information:
http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml