Covad Rejecting valid DMCA
EHWollmann
reply.
CC'D ab...@att.net, abus...@covad.com, customer...@tucows.com,
san....@ic.fbi.gov, sb...@SMBTECH.COM, ab...@SMBTECH.COM, noc-
ipser...@covad.com
Domain Discreet
ATTN: smbtech.com
Rua Dr. Brito Camara, n 20, 1
Funchal, Madeira 9000-039
PT
Phone: 1-902-7495331
VIA email at Steve Burnett/Covad Communications Co.
2510 Zanker Rd.
San Jose, CA. 95131, US
Phone: 7033762520
http://whois.domaintools.com/smbtech.com
Smbtech.com
+1 408 505 3191
S. Michael Burnett (NETBLK-SMBTECH)
Kenneth St.
Campbell, California 95008 USA
Re: Takedown Notice, Copyright Infringement Claim
To smbtech.com/Covad Communications Co.:
My name is Edmond Wollmann of Altair Publications and I am the
copyright
owner of the following photographs and/or writings which are being
hosted,
displayed and made available on the web at the following hyperlinks
below.
This letter is official notification under the provisions of Section
512(c)
of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") to demand removal of
the
infringing materials. Please be advised that law requires you, as a
service
provider, to "expeditiously remove or disable access to" the
infringing
photographs upon receipt of this notice and that the effect of
noncompliance
may result in your being liable for secondary copyright infringement.
I have a good faith belief that use of the materials set forth below
and in
the manner complained of here is not authorized by me, the copyright
holder,
or by the law. The information provided here is accurate to the best
of my
knowledge. I swear under penalty of perjury that I am the copyright
holder.
My current contact information is included below next to my signature
and
please send me a prompt response indicating the actions you have taken
to
resolve this matter.
Sincerely,
/s/ Edmond H. Wollmann, PO Box 221000, San Diego, CA. 92192-1000 |
Tel.
(858) 453-2342 | email: alt...@astroconsulting.com List and location
of
infringing materials:
Page: http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
Thank you for your cooperation.
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
© 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Main http://www.edmondwollmann.com/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
Seth
EHWollmann <arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>You have received a valid email legal request and must comply or
>reply.
It isn't valid unless a court said so.
>Domain Discreet
> ATTN: smbtech.com
> Rua Dr. Brito Camara, n 20, 1
> Funchal, Madeira 9000-039
> PT
That doesn't look like the sort of address of somebody who must comply
with a DMCA notice.
>My name is Edmond Wollmann of Altair Publications and I am the
>copyright
>owner of the following photographs and/or writings which are being
>hosted,
>displayed and made available on the web at the following hyperlinks
>below.
Do you really claim to have written the sentence "Mr. Wollmann is a
well-known abuser of the ISP abuse process."? If not (and I also
notice many of the statements on that page include citations to
claimed authors; do you claim to have written those as well?) then
you'd need to specify precisely which items on that page you claim the
copyright on.
>I have a good faith belief that use of the materials set forth below
>and in
>the manner complained of here is not authorized by me, the copyright
>holder,
>or by the law. The information provided here is accurate to the best
>of my
>knowledge. I swear under penalty of perjury that I am the copyright
>holder.
You are really swearing under penalty of perjury that you are the
copyright holder of the sentence "Mr. Wollmann has shown himself in
many ways to be a poor Netizen and not someone whose opinion can be
trusted about the appropriateness of another's postings."?
I think you'd better talk to a lawyer immediately and take his advice.
Seth
Edmond Wollmann
>
> In article <f0cc98c5-0a4b-4b9b...@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
> EHWollmann <arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >You have received a valid email legal request and must comply or
> >reply.
>
> It isn't valid unless a court said so.
What do you take me for some idiot? I am the PUBLISHER, I am the
copyright holder. The DMCA is valid.
> >Domain Discreet
> > ATTN: smbtech.com
> > Rua Dr. Brito Camara, n 20, 1
> > Funchal, Madeira 9000-039
> > PT
> That doesn't look like the sort of address of somebody who must comply
> with a DMCA notice.
Sure Steve Burnette does, who is in California. His provider is breaking
the law by aiding him to evade this legal DMCA.
> >My name is Edmond Wollmann of Altair Publications and I am the
> >copyright
> >owner of the following photographs and/or writings which are being
> >hosted,
> >displayed and made available on the web at the following hyperlinks
> >below.
> Do you really claim to have written the sentence "Mr. Wollmann is a
> well-known abuser of the ISP abuse process."? If not (and I also
> notice many of the statements on that page include citations to
> claimed authors; do you claim to have written those as well?) then
> you'd need to specify precisely which items on that page you claim the
> copyright on.
My copyrights are clearly listed because the idiot was even bold enough
to include them.
> >I have a good faith belief that use of the materials set forth below
> >and in
> >the manner complained of here is not authorized by me, the copyright
> >holder,
> >or by the law. The information provided here is accurate to the best
> >of my
> >knowledge. I swear under penalty of perjury that I am the copyright
> >holder.
>
> You are really swearing under penalty of perjury that you are the
> copyright holder of the sentence "Mr. Wollmann has shown himself in
> many ways to be a poor Netizen and not someone whose opinion can be
> trusted about the appropriateness of another's postings."?
I did not define that sentence asshole.
> I think you'd better talk to a lawyer immediately and take his advice.
I have a lawyer, and I don't NEED a lawyer to issue DMCAs for my own
copyrighted material.
> Seth
Not answering me is creating legal complications for them and damages as
well as possible criminal charges.
Mr Burnette, you MUST comply or face further action.
Now for the entire claim which you conveniently edited to suit your
fraudulent bullshit:
You have received a valid email legal request and must comply or
reply.
CC'D ab...@att.net, abus...@covad.com, customer...@tucows.com,
Domain Discreet
ATTN: smbtech.com
Rua Dr. Brito Camara, n 20, 1
Funchal, Madeira 9000-039
PT
Phone: 1-902-7495331
VIA email at Steve Burnett/Covad Communications Co.
2510 Zanker Rd.
San Jose, CA. 95131, US
Phone: 7033762520
http://whois.domaintools.com/smbtech.com
Smbtech.com
+1 408 505 3191
S. Michael Burnett (NETBLK-SMBTECH)
Kenneth St.
Campbell, California 95008 USA
Re: Takedown Notice, Copyright Infringement Claim
To smbtech.com/Covad Communications Co.:
My name is Edmond Wollmann of Altair Publications and I am the copyright
owner of the following photographs and/or writings which are being
hosted, displayed and made available on the web at the following
hyperlinks below.
This letter is official notification under the provisions of Section
512(c)of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") to demand removal
of the infringing materials. Please be advised that law requires you, as
a service provider, to "expeditiously remove or disable access to" the
infringing photographs upon receipt of this notice and that the effect
of noncompliance may result in your being liable for secondary copyright
infringement.
I have a good faith belief that use of the materials set forth below
and in the manner complained of here is not authorized by me, the
copyright holder, or by the law. The information provided here is
accurate to the best of my knowledge. I swear under penalty of perjury
that I am the copyright holder.
My current contact information is included below next to my signature
and please send me a prompt response indicating the actions you have
taken to resolve this matter.
Sincerely,
/s/ Edmond H. Wollmann, PO Box 221000, San Diego, CA. 92192-1000 |
Tel.
(858) 453-2342 | email: alt...@astroconsulting.com List and location
of
infringing materials:
Page: http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
Thank you for your cooperation.
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
� 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/
Cujo DeSockpuppet
news:4ACC10...@earthlink.net:
> Seth wrote:
>>
>> In article
>> <f0cc98c5-0a4b-4b9b...@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
>> EHWollmann <arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >You have received a valid email legal request and must comply or
>> >reply.
>>
>> It isn't valid unless a court said so.
>
> What do you take me for some idiot?
Of course.
> I am the PUBLISHER, I am the copyright holder. The DMCA is valid.
What is it that you're claiming a copyright, Pantyhead?
>> >Domain Discreet
>> > ATTN: smbtech.com
>> > Rua Dr. Brito Camara, n 20, 1
>> > Funchal, Madeira 9000-039
>> > PT
>
>> That doesn't look like the sort of address of somebody who must
>> comply with a DMCA notice.
>
> Sure Steve Burnette does, who is in California. His provider is
> breaking the law by aiding him to evade this legal DMCA.
Incoherence noted.
>> >My name is Edmond Wollmann of Altair Publications and I am the
>> >copyright
>> >owner of the following photographs and/or writings which are being
>> >hosted,
>> >displayed and made available on the web at the following hyperlinks
>> >below.
>
>> Do you really claim to have written the sentence "Mr. Wollmann is a
>> well-known abuser of the ISP abuse process."? If not (and I also
>> notice many of the statements on that page include citations to
>> claimed authors; do you claim to have written those as well?) then
>> you'd need to specify precisely which items on that page you claim
>> the copyright on.
>
> My copyrights are clearly listed because the idiot was even bold
> enough to include them.
It's called fair use. Too bad for you, Edmo.
>> >I have a good faith belief that use of the materials set forth below
>> >and in
>> >the manner complained of here is not authorized by me, the copyright
>> >holder,
>> >or by the law. The information provided here is accurate to the best
>> >of my
>> >knowledge. I swear under penalty of perjury that I am the copyright
>> >holder.
>>
>> You are really swearing under penalty of perjury that you are the
>> copyright holder of the sentence "Mr. Wollmann has shown himself in
>> many ways to be a poor Netizen and not someone whose opinion can be
>> trusted about the appropriateness of another's postings."?
>
> I did not define that sentence asshole.
What's a "sentence asshole", asshole?
>> I think you'd better talk to a lawyer immediately and take his
>> advice.
>
> I have a lawyer, and I don't NEED a lawyer to issue DMCAs for my own
> copyrighted material.
You sure don't and yet you expect not to be ridiculed.
>> Seth
>
> Not answering me is creating legal complications for them and damages
> as well as possible criminal charges.
Someone must have decided it was fair use, Pantyhead. Let's recall the
time you got a DMCA notice when you had your site on Verio. You lost that
account because you refused to take it down.
> Mr Burnette, you MUST comply or face further action.
>
> Now for the entire claim which you conveniently edited to suit your
> fraudulent bullshit:
> You have received a valid email legal request and must comply or
> reply.
Why is it valid? Jusy because you say so isn't going to cut it.
> CC'D ab...@att.net, abus...@covad.com, customer...@tucows.com,
> san....@ic.fbi.gov, sb...@SMBTECH.COM, ab...@SMBTECH.COM, noc-
> ipser...@covad.com
Edmo, you forgot to include the FTC. It's OK, they ignore you.
Which material is it you're whining about, Eddieeeeeeee? You claim it's
at the "following hyperlinks" and I only see one. I also don't recall any
photographs at the site.
One more thing, Edmo!
You have claimed many times you were "unaffected" by this site. You are
obviously a liar and hypocrite.
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"The dump is a good place too." -Edmond Wollmann, keeping his options
open for a future place for storing his unsold books.
DMCA Handler
> You have received a valid email legal request and must comply or
>
> My name is Edmond Wollmann of Altair Publications and I am the
> copyright
> owner of the following photographs and/or writings which are being
> hosted,
> displayed and made available on the web at the following hyperlinks
> below.
You are lying.
You have claimed several times that those weren't your writings, and
that they were forgeries.
Can't have it both ways, cupcake.
You won't be suing anyone. Your saber rattling is amusing, but not
intimidating. You don't have the stones or the dinero to pursue anything
legally.
Fujikawa Yamamoto
news:f0cc98c5-0a4b-4b9b...@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com:
BWAHAHAHA! You can't possibly be serious.
Nobody would be dense enough to claim the insanity you're citing in a DMCA
takedown request.
WindsorFox<[SS]>
> Seth wrote:
>> In article <f0cc98c5-0a4b-4b9b...@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
>> EHWollmann <arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> You have received a valid email legal request and must comply or
>>> reply.
>> It isn't valid unless a court said so.
>
> What do you take me for some idiot? I am the PUBLISHER, I am the
> copyright holder. The DMCA is valid.
>
Then get off your ample ass and sue them and quit whining about it
on Usenet, you fucking whine for 12 years and you think it's suddenly
going to work one day?? WTF, over.
--
.
All people have the right to stupidity
but some abuse the privilege. - Steve Linford
Edmond Wollmann
>
> Edmond Wollmann wrote:
> > Seth wrote:
> >> In article <f0cc98c5-0a4b-4b9b...@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
> >> EHWollmann <arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >>> You have received a valid email legal request and must comply or
> >>> reply.
> >> It isn't valid unless a court said so.
> >
> > What do you take me for some idiot? I am the PUBLISHER, I am the
> > copyright holder. The DMCA is valid.
> >
>
> Then get off your ample ass and sue them and quit whining about it
> on Usenet, you fucking whine for 12 years and you think it's suddenly
> going to work one day?? WTF, over.
Stop emailing me goddammit! I don't have to sue anybody, they gave me
the opportunity by suing me, now all of you are subject to subpoenas and
depositions for ME. Keep it up I'll fucking bring you all into court.
Edmond Wollmann
>
> EHWollmann wrote:
> > You have received a valid email legal request and must comply or
>
> >
> > My name is Edmond Wollmann of Altair Publications and I am the
> > copyright
> > owner of the following photographs and/or writings which are being
> > hosted,
> > displayed and made available on the web at the following hyperlinks
> > below.
>
> You are lying.
>
> You have claimed several times that those weren't your writings, and
> that they were forgeries.
Some of them are, are you respresenting them under a fraudulent ISP or
are you just jacking off? If they refuse to take it off then I will take
them to court and the fraudulent ones will be left there if they want
them and the real copyright infringment removed, makes no difference to
me how they want to get punished.
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
� 2009 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Cujo DeSockpuppet
news:haid03$te$1...@posting2.glorb.com:
> Edmond Wollmann wrote:
>> Seth wrote:
>>> In article
>>> <f0cc98c5-0a4b-4b9b...@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
>>> EHWollmann <arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>> You have received a valid email legal request and must comply or
>>>> reply.
>>> It isn't valid unless a court said so.
>>
>> What do you take me for some idiot? I am the PUBLISHER, I am the
>> copyright holder. The DMCA is valid.
> Then get off your ample ass and sue them and quit whining about
> it on Usenet,
I think it's still February of 2002 in EdmoWorld[1].
> you fucking whine for 12 years and you think it's
> suddenly going to work one day?? WTF, over.
That's why Edmo is a fucking kook.
[1] That's the date of his lawsuit that will "sue the fuck out of you".
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"PhDs in psychology (and other fields as well) see me as insightful,
intellectual, sharp, clear, profound, pragmatic and very useful and
constructive. Spinics see me as a "kook. Who shall we believe?" -
Ed on a post-Xmas meltdown.
Cujo DeSockpuppet
> WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:
>>
>> Edmond Wollmann wrote:
>> > Seth wrote:
>> >> In article
>> >> <f0cc98c5-0a4b-4b9b...@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
>> >> EHWollmann <arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >>> You have received a valid email legal request and must comply or
>> >>> reply.
>> >> It isn't valid unless a court said so.
>> >
>> > What do you take me for some idiot? I am the PUBLISHER, I am the
>> > copyright holder. The DMCA is valid.
>> >
>>
>> Then get off your ample ass and sue them and quit whining about
>> it
>> on Usenet, you fucking whine for 12 years and you think it's suddenly
>> going to work one day?? WTF, over.
>
> Stop emailing me goddammit! I don't have to sue anybody, they gave me
> the opportunity by suing me, now all of you are subject to subpoenas
> and depositions for ME. Keep it up I'll fucking bring you all into
> court.
Are those panties twisted around your head that tight?
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"Absolutely "nothing" happens to me here." - Edmo just before whining
more spurious complaints to deaf ears.
Seth
Edmond Wollmann <arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>Seth wrote:
>> In article <f0cc98c5-0a4b-4b9b...@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
>> EHWollmann <arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >You have received a valid email legal request and must comply or
>> >reply.
>>
>> It isn't valid unless a court said so.
>
>What do you take me for some idiot?
Wow, that might be the first correct thing you've ever posted.
> I am the PUBLISHER, I am the copyright holder.
The publisher and copyright holder of *what*? If you're the publisher
of the web site you're whining about, are you sending a DMCA notice to
yourself?
You clearly do not own the copyright to that page.
>List and location of infringing materials:
>
>Page: http://www.smbtech.com/ed/
So you're not specifying, thereby claiming everything on that page.
That claim is clearly false.
> The DMCA is valid.
So you repeat. How many repetitions will make it true, according to
you?
>> >Domain Discreet
>> > ATTN: smbtech.com
>> > Rua Dr. Brito Camara, n 20, 1
>> > Funchal, Madeira 9000-039
>> > PT
>
>> That doesn't look like the sort of address of somebody who must comply
>> with a DMCA notice.
>
>Sure Steve Burnette does, who is in California.
When did California move to Funchal, Madeira, PT?
> His provider is breaking
>the law by aiding him to evade this legal DMCA.
Which law, specifically? Give a cite to the exact law, on a
government web site, or expect not to be believed.
>> Do you really claim to have written the sentence "Mr. Wollmann is a
>> well-known abuser of the ISP abuse process."? If not (and I also
>> notice many of the statements on that page include citations to
>> claimed authors; do you claim to have written those as well?) then
>> you'd need to specify precisely which items on that page you claim the
>> copyright on.
>
>My copyrights are clearly listed because the idiot was even bold enough
>to include them.
Your supposed DMCA notice points to the entire web page, with no
"clearly listed" parts.
>> >I have a good faith belief that use of the materials set forth below
>> >and in
>> >the manner complained of here is not authorized by me, the copyright
>> >holder,
>> >or by the law.
I believe that you didn't authorize anything.
I believe that the copyright holder(s) of the majority of the text on
that page _did_ authorize the use of their text.
I believe that the law authorizes the use of the rest of the text on
that page under Fair Use.
Apparently you disagree, which carries no authority. A court ruling
carries authority. You don't have one.
>> > The information provided here is accurate to the best
>> >of my knowledge.
Talk about "damning with faint praise."
>> > I swear under penalty of perjury that I am the copyright
>> >holder.
Of what, specifically?
>> You are really swearing under penalty of perjury that you are the
>> copyright holder of the sentence "Mr. Wollmann has shown himself in
>> many ways to be a poor Netizen and not someone whose opinion can be
>> trusted about the appropriateness of another's postings."?
>
>I did not define that sentence asshole.
That sentence asshole appears on the page you claim the copyright to.
>> I think you'd better talk to a lawyer immediately and take his advice.
>
>I have a lawyer,
What did he advise you to do?
> and I don't NEED a lawyer to issue DMCAs for my own
>copyrighted material.
So apparently you aren't taking his advice.
>Not answering me is creating legal complications for them and damages as
>well as possible criminal charges.
I haven't seen anything resembling "legal complications". More
whining on your part doesn't qualify for that term.
>Mr Burnette, you MUST comply or face further action.
Still more whining? Is that what you consider action?
Seth
Edmond Wollmann
Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!panix!not-for-mail
From:
se...@panix.com (Seth)
Newsgroups:
news.admin.net-abuse.misc, alt.astrology,
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Subject:
Re: Covad Rejecting valid DMCA
Date:
Wed, 7 Oct 2009 18:22:13 +0000 (UTC)
Organization:
Society for the Promulgation of Cruelty to the
Clueless
Lines:
126
Message-ID:
<haim8l$fim$1...@reader1.panix.com>
References:
<f0cc98c5-0a4b-4b9b...@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>
<ha9k20$l1p$1...@reader1.panix.com> <4ACC10...@earthlink.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:
panix5.panix.com
X-Trace:
reader1.panix.com 1254939733 15958 166.84.1.5 (7 Oct
2009 18:22:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
ab...@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date:
Wed, 7 Oct 2009 18:22:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader:
trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
Bytes:
4971
Xref:
number.nntp.dca.giganews.com
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet:756327 alt.astrology:682023
news.admin.net-abuse.misc:196711
> The DMCA is valid.
Of what, specifically?
Seth
--
Cujo DeSockpuppet
> Off topic evasion and fraud.
This is why you're a fucking kook, Eddieeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
> Path:
>
> border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!new
> s1.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!panix!not-fo
> r-mail
--
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in dfw.*,
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych. Supreme Holy
Overlord of alt.fucknozzles. Winner of the 8/2000, 2/2003 & 4/2007 HL&S
award. July 2005 Hammer of Thor. Winning Trainer - Barbara Woodhouse
Memorial Dog Whistle - 12/2005 & 4/2008. COOSN-266-06-01895.
"I can see why you have difficulty understanding why I am a babe
magnet" - Edmo understates the facts.
Fujikawa Yamamoto
news:4ACCC6...@earthlink.net:
> WindsorFox<[SS]> wrote:
>>
>> Edmond Wollmann wrote:
>> > Seth wrote:
>> >> In article
>> >> <f0cc98c5-0a4b-4b9b...@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
>> >> EHWollmann <arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >>> You have received a valid email legal request and must comply or
>> >>> reply.
>> >> It isn't valid unless a court said so.
>> >
>> > What do you take me for some idiot? I am the PUBLISHER, I am the
>> > copyright holder. The DMCA is valid.
>> >
>>
>> Then get off your ample ass and sue them and quit whining about
>> it
>> on Usenet, you fucking whine for 12 years and you think it's suddenly
>> going to work one day?? WTF, over.
>
> Stop emailing me goddammit! I don't have to sue anybody, they gave me
> the opportunity by suing me, now all of you are subject to subpoenas
> and depositions for ME. Keep it up I'll fucking bring you all into
> court.
You got any pictures of that castle and airstrip in New Mexico? I'd
like to get it appraised and see if it's worth taking when you lose.
Chris Krolczyk
wrote:
> Seth wrote:
>
> > In article <f0cc98c5-0a4b-4b9b-9793-7eb8cdac2...@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,
> > EHWollmann <arcturian...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > >You have received a valid email legal request and must comply or
> > >reply.
>
> > It isn't valid unless a court said so.
>
> What do you take me for some idiot?
Yes. Very much so.
> I am the PUBLISHER, I am the
> copyright holder. The DMCA is valid.
Cognitive dissonance noted.
I also notice that you apparently think you're
a court.
Feel free to get back to me when you start to
think you're a toilet instead. You'd finally
be making progress.
-Chris Krolczyk