can someone in news admin bounce the account of Musatov for forgery?
Archimedes Plutonium
I do not know if you are aware that sci.math as of
the past several months is flooded with google posts from a "Musatov"
and morphs. It has enraged
many sci.math subscribers to seek a moderated sci.math.
I personally was not bothered by this flooding of the newsgroup
sci.math by Musatov with his hundreds to thousands of daily spam.
However, I am offended by his habit of making a
post look as though I authored it. I call it it
"tacit forgery" or "fooled as forgery"
It is where Musatov plants my name in such a manner so that when
Google displays a search, that
it appears as if I was the author of the spammed crap. Witness the
below two:
openanything...
3 posts - 1 author - Last post: yesterday
By Archimedes Plutonium - 10:10am - 1 new of 1 message - Report as
spam.
Reporting thread. Reported thread ...
http://www.groupsrv.com/science/about459821.html
openanything
sci.math - 1 post - 1 author - Last post: 10 hours ago
Then... more » By Archimedes Plutonium - 10:10am - 1 new of 1 message
- Report
as spam Reporting thread Reported thread 1 - 10 of 191810 « Newer |
Older ...
http://groups.google.com/g/2757fef6/t/6faf3c977b2fd10d/d/3de34bbada4beab?...
The danger here is that anyone making a Google Search of Archimedes
Plutonium is tricked into thinking I was the author of that titled
spam.
I please ask of news admin to bounce this Musatov as a forgerer and a
voluminous spammer of sci.math.
AP
It's Your Thing Do What You Want To Do!
Dear Archimedes Plutonium,
A)There is something called the First Amendment and another thing
called,
B)'I have no idea what you are talking about' and both
C) A+B=apply [here].
Signed, Musatov
Post Scriptum I suggest you gain a thorough understanding of
algorithmic behavior in social settings and in [the future at least]
refrain from slandering a citizen of the United States of America's
good name and the great state of California and the great city of Los
Angeles.
[No analysis or commentary necessary = 1/2 algorithm 1/4 narrative
+1/4 ?]
m=AP[=NP+3D]++++++++
Musatov
"Archimedes Plutonium" <plutonium....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:74b99100-ac13-41e0...@q35g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
>hello news admin. net abuse. misc
>I do not know if you are aware that sci.math as of
>the past several months is flooded with google posts from a "Musatov"
>and morphs. It has enraged
>many sci.math subscribers to seek a moderated sci.math.
>I personally was not bothered by this flooding of the newsgroup
>sci.math by Musatov with his hundreds to thousands of daily spam.
Learn what the word "hundreds" means, imbecile.
Learn what the word "thousands" means, imbecile.
Autymn D. C.
>
> > The danger here is that anyone making a Google Search of Archimedes
> > Plutonium is tricked into thinking I was the author of that titled
> > spam.
>
> > I please ask of news admin to bounce this Musatov as a forgerer and a
> > voluminous spammer of sci.math.
>
> > AP
>
> Dear Archimedes Plutonium,
>
> A)There is something called the First Amendment and another thing
> called,
The first amendment was the worst thing for America.
mike3
Why's that? It's good to prevent people from critiquing their
government?
tadchem
<plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hello news admin. net abuse. misc
>
> I do not know if you are aware that sci.math as of
> the past several months is flooded with google posts from a "Musatov"
> and morphs. It has enraged
> many sci.math subscribers to seek a moderated sci.math.
>
> I personally was not bothered by this flooding of the newsgroup
> sci.math by Musatov with his hundreds to thousands of daily spam.
>
> However, I am offended by his habit of making a
> post look as though I authored it. I call it it
> "tacit forgery" or "fooled as forgery"
>
> It is where Musatov plants my name in such a manner so that when
> Google displays a search, that
> it appears as if I was the author of the spammed crap. Witness the
> below two:
>
> openanything...
>
> 3 posts - 1 author - Last post: yesterday
> By Archimedes Plutonium - 10:10am - 1 new of 1 message - Report as
> spam.
>
> openanything
>
> sci.math - 1 post - 1 author - Last post: 10 hours ago
> Then... more » By Archimedes Plutonium - 10:10am - 1 new of 1 message
> - Report
> as spam Reporting thread Reported thread 1 - 10 of 191810 « Newer |
>
> The danger here is that anyone making a Google Search of Archimedes
> Plutonium is tricked into thinking I was the author of that titled
> spam.
>
> I please ask of news admin to bounce this Musatov as a forgerer and a
> voluminous spammer of sci.math.
>
> AP
I am reminded of a line by Groucho Marx: "I would not join any club
that would have me as a member."
Any well-moderated newsgroup that would reject Musatov may just as
well reject Archimedes Plutonium.
Perhaps this is why you frequent unmoderated groups.
"Be careful what you ask for; you just might get it."
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
Adam H. Kerman
>Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>I please ask of news admin to bounce this Musatov as a forgerer and a
>>voluminous spammer of sci.math.
>I am reminded of a line by Groucho Marx: "I would not join any club
>that would have me as a member."
It is amazing how many people misinterpret Groucho's remarks. In that era,
it was extremely common that the established country clubs were restricted
against accepting Jewish members. Some clubs wouldn't even allow members to
bring Jewish guests. Groucho wasn't saying that he couldn't join the more
desireable clubs because the members didn't like his humor, or because he
wasn't sociable, or because he wasn't wealthy enough. He couldn't join
because he was Jewish, period. He wasn't interested in being appeased
by joining the unrestricted (Jewish) clubs, in part because of a lack of
status that he perceived.
>Any well-moderated newsgroup that would reject Musatov may just as
>well reject Archimedes Plutonium.
Uh, yeah, no kidding, and it wouldn't be discriminatory but because the
moderator was doing his job.
P = N - P + P = 02eNtroPy
Adam H. Kerman isinulat:
Seth
Adam H. Kerman <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>tadchem <tad...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>Any well-moderated newsgroup that would reject Musatov may just as
>>well reject Archimedes Plutonium.
>
>Uh, yeah, no kidding, and it wouldn't be discriminatory but because the
>moderator was doing his job.
It wouldn't reject either of them.
It might well reject all of their attempted posts.
Seth
Michael
> In article <h9i2ed$24...@news.albasani.net>,
> >>Any well-moderated newsgroup that would reject Musatov may just as
> >>well reject Archimedes Plutonium.
>
> >Uh, yeah, no kidding, and it wouldn't be discriminatory but because the
> >moderator was doing his job.
>
> It wouldn't reject either of them.
>
> It might well reject all of their attempted posts.
>
> Seth
-Seth
+Michael
Adam H. Kerman
>>Adam H. Kerman <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>tadchem <tadc...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>Any well-moderated newsgroup that would reject Musatov may just as
>>>>well reject Archimedes Plutonium.
>>>Uh, yeah, no kidding, and it wouldn't be discriminatory but because the
>>>moderator was doing his job.
>Why?
It's a hypothetical in that neither of you is posting on topic.
Seth
Michael <marty....@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sep 25, 9:39�am, se...@panix.com (Seth) wrote:
>> In article <h9i2ed$24...@news.albasani.net>,
>> Adam H. Kerman <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>> >tadchem <tadc...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >>Any well-moderated newsgroup that would reject Musatov may just as
>> >>well reject Archimedes Plutonium.
>>
>> >Uh, yeah, no kidding, and it wouldn't be discriminatory but because the
>> >moderator was doing his job.
>Why?
Have they posted anything relevant?
>> It wouldn't reject either of them.
>What is 'It'?
The (moderator of the) aforementioned "well-moderated newsgroup".
>> It might well reject all of their attempted posts.
>What is 'It'?
Same as above.
Seth
marty....@gmail.com
Seth
>Moderators should be brave enough to disclose their names otherwise
>assumed to have alterior motives for asking to remain anonymous such
>as protecting themselves against those who they moderate.
It does not provide anybody with any obligation.
Seth