Jesse Hughes of Bentley College uses signature block to defame others; Ann Reeves Re: What's wrong with supertasks?
Archimedes Plutonium
Usenet to systematically
use a signature block to repetitiously misquote someone out of context
for the purpose
of making that person look bad. I think Hughes should be banned from
posting to Usenet
for he cannot stop his bad behaviour.
Jesse F. Hughes wrote:
> Herman Jurjus <hjm...@hetnet.nl> writes:
>
> > In order to draw any conclusion at all about the limit cases, you need
> > an additional assumption, something to the effect of a frame assumption
> > like 'apart from the manipulations explicitly announced, no other
> > manipulations are done'.
>
> Er, nothing special about the limit cases in this regard. You need
> the same assumption for the successor cases.
>
> --
> "At some point in the future history of humanity, AP will eclipse even
> Jesus." -- Archimedes Plutonium, 10/21/07
> "I wrote those lines because I am not a megalomania [sic] but rather
> very humble and down to earth." -- Archimedes Plutonium, 10/22/07
Conversation with Ann Reeves of Bentley College
> From: Archimedes Plutonium [plutonium....@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 12:40 AM
> To: Reeves, Ann
> Subject: Re: Jesse F Hughes, bad behaviour on sci.math
>
> Hello, I am sorry I did not elaborate.
>
> For years now, Hughes uses his signature block of Usenet posts such as sci.
> math
> and constantly repeats "quotes out of context" He hunts down sentences
> in old posts
> and fishes for sentences that "defame his target".
>
> I made a post about Jesus some 4 or 5 years ago and Hughes took out a
> sentence
> and has kept repeating that obnoxious out of context quote for about 3
> years now.
>
> Another one of my quotes about "misanthrope" I had emailed you earlier
> today.
>
> Please, all I am asking is for someone to talk with him. Communicate
> that it is bad behaviour to fish through someones posts for a sentence
> that defames another. It is bad behaviour
> to Quote out of Context and to repititiously post that quote, so that
> it appears on Google
> searches.
>
> Quoting out of Context. Seems like every professor even adjunct ones
> should know better.
>
> The guy keeps bothering me, as if he just cannot stop from mentioning
> my name. He does
> not take to -hints- go away and stop mentioning my name.
>
> Please, Ann, if you made a search of Jesse F Hughes posts with the
> name Archimedes
> Plutonium, there is that "quoting out of context" for 3 years now.
>
> I tried to stop him a month ago by posting in NEWS ADMIN NET ABUSE and
> he stopped
> for that month.
>
> But he is back with his bad behaviour.
>
> Thanks if you could talk to him and persuade him to just "go away and
> leave me alone"
> thanks.
Some months back I posted to NEWS.ADMIN.NET-ABUSE.MISC about this
issue
of Hughes and NANAM stopped him. But it appears that he just cannot
ever stop
completely. So I ask NANA to bann him from posting to Usenet.
AP
Marshall
<plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe the practice and habits of Jesse Hughes are illegal on
> Usenet to systematically
> use a signature block to repetitiously misquote someone out of context
> for the purpose
> of making that person look bad. I think Hughes should be banned from
> posting to Usenet
> for he cannot stop his bad behaviour.
I believe the practice and habit of Jesse Hughes are hilarious
on Usenet to systematically use a signature block to accurately
quote someone when they say something notable.
Perhaps you are jealous that most of his attention goes to JSH?
Months ago, when you made the first complaint, I looked up
the post in which you made the quoted remark. There was
nothing misquoted or out of context about it. Hughes behavior
is impeccable.
Marshall
Archimedes Plutonium
One would think that if anyone earned a degree from University,
whether Bentley
University or elsewhere that they would know *quoting out of context*
repetitively
in a "bad light" is defamation. Anyone with a BA degree or BS degree
or Masters
or PhD degrees should have known this.
News Admin cleaned up Usenet of forgeries in the mid 1990s because
Usenet really
cannot function or exist with rampant forgery, where noone can be sure
of an author's
post. I myself was forged many times, and the cost in energy to me to
have to declare
each forgery and have News Admin expunge the forgery.
But quoting out of Context is very much near to forgery, even though
it is not forgery
per se.
News Admin has some rules and regulations on SIGNATURE BLOCKS. I
remember in
the mid 1990s a discussion over the rules and etiquette of signature-
blocks,
a post citing that the block has to be *not too long*, and cannot be
used as a repetitive
defamation on other people.
So, how about I make this part of my signature block for the next 5
years
so that everyone making a Google Search of Marshall Spight will be
sure
to see the words below:
"Hey, man, if you're going to be an asshole all the time, at least
own
up to being an asshole. I can have some respect for an honest
asshole, but a disingenuous asshole?" -- Marshall Spight
Apr 3 2008, 10:13 am
Both Marshall Spight and Jesse Hughes needs to go back to High School
to
learn some manners and to learn why it is that a writer quotes in the
first place.
We quote when it is relevant to the text we are writing. If not
relevant it is OUT of Context.
Why include quotes Out of Context? The only reason is that Hughes and
Spight hate the
guts of AP and is using a signature block to repetitively and
constantly defame AP.
Notice also in this Hughes post:
Jesse F. Hughes wrote:
> Herman Jurjus <hjm...@hetnet.nl> writes:
>
> > In order to draw any conclusion at all about the limit cases, you need
> > an additional assumption, something to the effect of a frame assumption
> > like 'apart from the manipulations explicitly announced, no other
> > manipulations are done'.
>
> Er, nothing special about the limit cases in this regard. You need
> the same assumption for the successor cases.
>
> --
> "At some point in the future history of humanity, AP will eclipse even
> Jesus." -- Archimedes Plutonium, 10/21/07
> "I wrote those lines because I am not a megalomania [sic] but rather
> very humble and down to earth." -- Archimedes Plutonium, 10/22/07
That Hughes does not sign it but leaves the ending as -- Archimedes
Plutonium, 10/22/07
which leaves a immediate impression on newbies to Usenet that I wrote
the above
text of the whole entire post.
So anyone who hates someone else, can fish through their posts to
Usenet and
construct a defamation sentence Out of Context and repetitively smear
and defame
an innocent victim.
It is my opinion that since neither Spight nor Hughes can see or
understand their
moral trespass, that their degrees from whatever university they
earned their degree
should be annulled. Most High School students can see that Hughes and
now Spight
do not know the difference between "right and wrong".
Archimedes Plutonium
Seth
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> wrote:
>Some months back I posted to NEWS.ADMIN.NET-ABUSE.MISC about this
>issue
>of Hughes and NANAM stopped him.
If it worked last time, why not do it again?
> But it appears that he just cannot
>ever stop
>completely.
Oh, you mean they stopped him but he didn't actually stop.
> So I ask NANA to bann him from posting to Usenet.
Sure, we [tinw] will stop him just as much.
Seth
Marshall
<plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So, how about I make this part of my signature block for the next 5
> years so that everyone making a Google Search of Marshall Spight
> will be sure to see the words below:
>
> "Hey, man, if you're going to be an asshole all the time, at least
> own up to being an asshole. I can have some respect for an
> honest asshole, but a disingenuous asshole?" -- Marshall Spight
> Apr 3 2008, 10:13 am
That would be awesome.
Marshall