Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email
From: SPAMJAMR <Letzta...@aol.com>
Date: 30 Jan 2005 11:01:53 -0800
Local: Sun, Jan 30 2005 2:01 pm
Subject: Re: [k00k> SuN Tsu/BananaNanae/AOL Spam Trap/LobbyFerret1/CoolSearchBiz/Brothers Darren[at]aol.com <Stalker] spoofed by http://mevq.jngegjlmgk.info/?MtO3O4g1NkT J5gggll
In article <cDKKd.8837$8Z1....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>, Spam Reporting
says... >And I use what works... As do spammers. >if sending LARTs worked reliably enough to get If the cops could catch every crook there would be no need for lynch mobs. >the spamvertised websites shut down every time, there'd be no need for >SV. What one form of abuse matter if it works? Why not use others? "It works" is all If Ralsky were found drawn and quartered that might scare others from spamming. I dont care how you rationalize your morally bankrupt behaviour, you and Sun are You advocate SV, which by your own admission is abusive, and justify it because Sun uses lies and false information to "out a kook" or those whose manner he I dont see the difference. -- Paging Snotty Richter, please pick up the red "You're Fucked Now" phone. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||