From: Marc Bissonnette <use...@canadianisp.ca>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:17:01 -0600
Local: Tues, Feb 28 2012 2:17 pm
Subject: Re: A great example of how Nanae is able to irritate me
Andrew <stephens...@gmail.com> wrote in news:c174a993-6bc8-40fa-bda3-
> On Feb 28, 10:36 am, Andy <acg.chic...@gmail.com> wrote:You *just asked* people which *federal law* DP Mailer violates, yet now you
>> > You got me on that....but it was for pot (which
>> > I would argue is far from a drug)
>> So Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is... what, an air freshener? :-)
> I byproduct of a plant that grows from the ground and Christians would
are stating that *federal law*, which definines marijuanna as an illicit
drug is invalid ?
This *so* does not surprise me:
You choose which laws are convenient for you, yet ignore those that are
There is a word for people like you.
Hang on, I'm getting old, let me search my memory for a second...
Oh yes, here it is:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.