Received: by 10.68.232.169 with SMTP id tp9mr20893455pbc.6.1332804776245;
        Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
Path: z9ni5380pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.megapath.net!news.megapath.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:32:54 -0500
References: <cone.1332631799.946199.7752.1000@monster.email-scan.com> <jkq0od$jvr$1@panix5.panix.com>
Message-ID: <cone.1332804760.432840.28109.1000@monster.email-scan.com>
X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/
From: Sam <s...@email-scan.com>
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email
Subject: Re: Serverbeach.com-hosted spam emitter on 64.34.167.154,
         64.34.185.188 and 64.34.186.199
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
    boundary="=_mimegpg-monster.email-scan.com-28109-1332804760-0005";
    micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:32:54 -0500
Lines: 51
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.254.115.190
X-Trace: sv3-vk7H3rS31OjhXZaY3IxU9byY4R3v/qRS28e92ar8PyhtpemJFB+r+Oy9qvFdv0BI1SDk5s/ly2f/N4t!/EbXZUQA5ph5cv1m3QAnK3BJsfTuSQrp1wZ0PD8eJ3gN1ElKxF+XZ78RSQPNqMQWkdISKXnRXHah!JNH2b6eF2JRVnqY2qE85mChVLWby820HyWAQoFbapKPN
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3162

This is a MIME GnuPG-signed message.  If you see this text, it means that
your E-mail or Usenet software does not support MIME signed messages.
The Internet standard for MIME PGP messages, RFC 2015, was published in 1996.
To open this message correctly you will need to install E-mail or Usenet
software that supports modern Internet standards.

--=_mimegpg-monster.email-scan.com-28109-1332804760-0005
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Greg Pratt writes:

> In article <cone.1332631799.946199.7752.1...@monster.email-scan.com>,
> Sam <s...@email-scan.com> wrote:
> >A new spam factory opened for business, snowshoing from at least three of
> >Serverbeach IP addresses. Not on any blacklists that I can see. The same
> >spam was received from these IP addresses, tying them together.
> >
> >No response to complaints to ab...@serverbeach.com.
> >
> >Peer1: instruct serverbeach to remove this spamming parasite from their
> >network.
>
> There's your problem: you're expecting Peer1 to care.

They will, it's only a question of motivation. They will care when the  
benefits of keeping their pet spammers around are outweighed by the  
negatives.

It's a business call, nothing more.

If everyone started forwarding all of their Peer1-originated spam, that  
they're ignoring, back to their senior executive leadership, I have no doubt  
that things will change quickly.



--=_mimegpg-monster.email-scan.com-28109-1332804760-0005
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk9w/JgACgkQx9p3GYHlUOKucgCfTrhMwsJqV9qT0Q2TuBPoDlZz
tkcAniK+orwIubs9UthSg5+hm47ei6ZW
=tuHL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_mimegpg-monster.email-scan.com-28109-1332804760-0005--