In article <1099856803.330827.6...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
do...@intercosmos.com says...

[snip]

Not in those emails, but he did in a thread here. In fact he accused him of
being a spammer because Darrens NNTP IP traceroutes through a major SBC backbone
router, through which you can find nanas article refering to that IP in other
traceroutes dating back to at least early 2003.

He also accused Darren of being Stan, Bob, and I dont know what other names,
then accused him of being associated with, or actually being a few different
spammers. He thought that Darren had registered dozens and dozens of domains
because all of them were listed with the physical address of 303 2nd Street,
which just so happens to be the location of an SBC office and SBC seems to be in
the habit of using that address for possibly hundreds or thousands of their
customers.

Sun attacked Darren because he didnt like his demeanor and some of the things he
was saying. Sun, in his own mind, had Darren tried and convicted, then
fabricated (quite poorly) the "evidence" to brand Darren a spammer.

Sun thought he could rely on on his "reputation", that his word would be
trusted, and that no one would look into the evidence.

When several people challenged his evidence, his responses were nothing more
than 'nyah, nyah'.

Sun promised to post his "long" evidence on Darren, but has yet to do so in
spite of being asked repeatedly to do so.

I have promised to join Sun in running Darren out of nanae if Sun can prove
(verifiably, step by tiny step, not galaxy wide leaps) that Darren is indeed a
spammer.

So far he has failed to step up to the challenge.

--
--

Paging Snotty Richter, please pick up the red "You're Fucked Now" phone.
Keep the Internet clean, practise spammus interruptus